State v. Owens - Stalking Conviction Appeal

Iowa Court of Appeals

Filed March 11th, 2026

Detected March 11th, 2026

Summary

The Iowa Court of Appeals affirmed Jereme Owens' stalking conviction, finding sufficient evidence to support the jury's verdict. Owens had appealed his conviction, arguing insufficient evidence for key elements of the stalking charge.

View original document View source feed page

What changed

The Iowa Court of Appeals has affirmed the stalking conviction of Jereme Michael Owens. Owens appealed his conviction, arguing that the evidence presented was insufficient to prove he engaged in a course of conduct, intended to cause fear or harm, or that the victim felt terrorized. The appellate court reviewed the evidence and found that substantial evidence supported each element of the stalking charge.

This decision means Owens' conviction stands. For legal professionals and courts involved in criminal appeals, this case reinforces the standard of review for sufficiency of evidence claims in stalking cases. The ruling highlights that appellate courts will affirm convictions if substantial evidence supports the jury's findings, even if the appellant disputes the interpretation of that evidence.

Source document (simplified)

Main Content

Case No. 24-1923

State of Iowa

v.
Jereme Michael Owens

Appellee

State of Iowa

Appellant

Jereme Michael Owens

Attorney for the Appellee

Genevieve Reinkoester, Assistant Attorney General

Attorney for the Appellant

Erin Carr

Court of Appeals

Court of Appeals Opinion

Opinion Number:

24-1923

Date Published:

Mar 11, 2026

Summary

Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Mahaska County, The Honorable Myron Gookin, Judge. AFFIRMED. Considered without oral argument by Schumacher, P.J., Chicchelly, J., and Doyle, S.J. Opinion by Chicchelly, J. (7 pages)

Jereme Owens appeals his jury conviction for stalking in violation of a protective order. On appeal, Owens argues there was insufficient evidence to show (1) he engaged in a course of conduct, (2) he intended to cause fear or harm, and (3) the victim felt terrorized, intimidated, or threatened. OPINION HOLDS: Because substantial evidence supports each element of stalking, we affirm Owens’s conviction.