Sixth District Court of Appeal affirms life sentence for molestation
Summary
The Sixth District Court of Appeal of Florida affirmed a life sentence for Matthew Edward Zink, who was convicted of lewd and lascivious molestation. The court found that any alleged error in sentencing regarding the Prison Releasee Reoffender designation was harmless.
What changed
The Sixth District Court of Appeal of Florida has affirmed the life sentence of Matthew Edward Zink, who was convicted of lewd and lascivious molestation with a victim under 12. The appellate court addressed two main arguments: the inadmissibility of alleged child hearsay statements and the legality of the sentencing under the Prison Releasee Reoffender (PRR) designation. The court affirmed the trial court's decision regarding the hearsay statements without further comment.
Regarding the PRR designation, the court acknowledged Zink's argument, which relied on the U.S. Supreme Court's decision in Erlinger v. United States, that a jury, not the trial court, should have made the finding concerning his release date from prior custody. However, the court found that even if this argument were accepted, affirmance was still required. Citing precedent, the court determined that any error in the PRR designation was harmless because Zink's conviction subjected him to a life sentence irrespective of that designation. Therefore, no enhanced sentence was imposed, and the error, if any, was harmless beyond a reasonable doubt.
Source document (simplified)
Jump To
Top Caption Disposition Combined Opinion
Support FLP
CourtListener is a project of Free
Law Project, a federally-recognized 501(c)(3) non-profit. Members help support our work and get special access to features.
Please become a member today.
March 6, 2026 Get Citation Alerts Download PDF Add Note
Matthew Edward Zink v. State of Florida
District Court of Appeal of Florida
- Citations: None known
- Docket Number: 6D2024-1626
Disposition: Affirmed
Disposition
Affirmed
Combined Opinion
SIXTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL
STATE OF FLORIDA
Case No. 6D2024-1626
Lower Tribunal No. 2021-CF-000977
MATTHEW EDWARD ZINK,
Appellant,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA,
Appellee.
Appeal from the Circuit Court for Collier County.
John McGowan, Judge.
March 6, 2026
PER CURIAM.
Matthew Edward Zink appeals the judgment and life sentence rendered on
July 22, 2024, after a jury found him guilty of lewd and lascivious molestation with
a victim less than 12 years of age. On appeal, he argues that the trial court erred in
not allowing a witness to testify regarding alleged child hearsay statements, and that
the trial court erred in sentencing him as a prison releasee reoffender (“PRR”)
because the jury did not make any findings regarding his release date from prison.
As to the trial court’s finding that the child hearsay statements were inadmissible,
we affirm without further comment.
Relying on Erlinger v. United States, 602 U.S. 821 (2024), Zink argues that
his sentence, which included a designation as a prison releasee reoffender, is illegal
because the trial court, rather than a jury, made the requisite finding concerning the
date he was released from custody on his prior conviction. While we have rejected
this argument in the past, even if accepted here, affirmance would still be required.
See Maye v. State, 368 So. 3d 531 (Fla. 6th DCA 2023), review granted, No.
SC2023-1184, 2024 WL 1796831 (Fla. Apr. 25, 2024). As we held in Avalos v.
State, 419 So. 3d 299, 300 (Fla. 6th DCA 2025), this type of alleged error is subject
to a harmless error analysis, and since the offense for which Zink was convicted of
subjected him to a life sentence irrespective of any PRR designation, he is not
serving an enhanced sentence. Accordingly, the error, if any, is harmless on this
record beyond a reasonable doubt. See Scott v. State, 413 So. 3d 276, 278 (Fla 5th
DCA 2025) (“[B]ecause Scott is not serving an enhanced sentence in this case, the
error, if any, committed by the trial court when it imposed Scott’s HFO sentences is
harmless on this record beyond a reasonable doubt.”). Accordingly, we affirm.
AFFIRMED.
TRAVER, C.J., and STARGEL and NARDELLA, JJ., concur.
Blair Allen, Public Defender, and Brett S. Chase, Special Assistant Public Defender,
Bartow, for Appellant.
James Uthmeier, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Jonathan P. Hurley, Senior
Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING
AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED
2
Related changes
Source
Classification
Who this affects
Taxonomy
Browse Categories
Get State Courts alerts
Weekly digest. AI-summarized, no noise.
Free. Unsubscribe anytime.
Get alerts for this source
We'll email you when FL District Court of Appeal Opinions publishes new changes.