Changeflow GovPing State Courts People v. Newton - Criminal Appeal Decision
Routine Enforcement Amended Final

People v. Newton - Criminal Appeal Decision

Favicon for www.courtlistener.com New York Appellate Division
Filed March 5th, 2026
Detected March 6th, 2026
Email

Summary

The Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York affirmed a judgment against Jamar Newton. The court found the sentence imposed was not excessive. This decision was issued on March 5, 2026.

What changed

The Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, in the case of People v. Newton (2026 NY Slip Op 01292), has affirmed a judgment previously rendered by the Supreme Court, New York County. The appeal concerned the sentence imposed on the defendant, Jamar Newton, under Indictment No. 2003/21 and Appeal No. 6001. The court found the sentence to be not excessive.

This decision represents a final determination on the appeal, affirming the lower court's judgment and sentence. For legal professionals and criminal defendants involved in similar appeals, this ruling reinforces the appellate division's stance on sentencing review within the First Department. No new compliance actions are required by this specific court opinion, as it addresses an individual case outcome.

Source document (simplified)

Jump To

Top Caption Combined Opinion

Support FLP

CourtListener is a project of Free
Law Project
, a federally-recognized 501(c)(3) non-profit. Members help support our work and get special access to features.

Please become a member today.

Join Free.law Now

March 5, 2026 Get Citation Alerts Add Note

People v. Newton

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Combined Opinion

People v Newton (2026 NY Slip Op 01292)
| People v Newton |
| 2026 NY Slip Op 01292 |
| Decided on March 05, 2026 |
| Appellate Division, First Department |
| Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. |
| This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports. |

Decided and Entered: March 05, 2026
Before: Moulton, J.P., Pitt-Burke, O'Neill Levy, Michael, Chan, JJ.
Ind No. 2003/21|Appeal No. 6001|Case No. 2023-03802|

*[1]The People of the State of New York, Respondent,

v

Jamar Newton, Defendant-Appellant.**

Twyla Carter, The Legal Aid Society, New York (Elizabeth Batkin of counsel), for appellant.

Alvin L. Bragg, Jr., District Attorney, New York (Alex King of counsel), for respondent.

An appeal having been taken to this Court by the above-named appellant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, New York County (Brendan T. Lantry, J.), rendered June 12, 2023,

Said appeal having been argued by counsel for the respective parties, due deliberation having been had thereon, and finding the sentence not excessive,

It is unanimously ordered that the judgment so appealed from be and the same is hereby affirmed.

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.

ENTERED: March 5, 2026

Counsel for appellant is referred to § 606.5, Rules of the Appellate Division, First Department.

Source

Analysis generated by AI. Source diff and links are from the original.

Classification

Agency
Federal and State Courts
Filed
March 5th, 2026
Instrument
Enforcement
Legal weight
Binding
Stage
Final
Change scope
Minor

Who this affects

Applies to
Courts Criminal defendants Legal professionals
Geographic scope
National (US)

Taxonomy

Primary area
Criminal Justice
Operational domain
Legal
Topics
Appellate Procedure Sentencing

Get State Courts alerts

Weekly digest. AI-summarized, no noise.

Free. Unsubscribe anytime.

Get alerts for this source

We'll email you when New York Appellate Division publishes new changes.

Free. Unsubscribe anytime.