Antoine DeGrate v. State of Texas - Dismissed Appeal
Summary
The Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District, dismissed the appeal of Antoine Demetruis DeGrate. The court found it lacked jurisdiction over the case, which involved a failure to register as a sex offender. The dismissal was based on the untimeliness of the appeal and the nature of the claims presented.
What changed
The Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District, has dismissed the appeal filed by Antoine Demetruis DeGrate in case numbers 10-26-00046-CR and 10-26-00047-CR. The court determined that it lacked jurisdiction because the notices of appeal were untimely and the appellant's attempt to file a writ of habeas corpus under article 11.07 of the Code of Criminal Procedure is not a proper mechanism for direct appeal, nor is it within the appellate court's jurisdiction.
This ruling means that DeGrate's attempt to appeal his convictions for failure to register as a sex offender has been unsuccessful due to procedural deficiencies. Regulated entities and legal professionals should note that direct appeals are not the appropriate venue for all post-conviction relief claims, and adherence to procedural rules and jurisdictional requirements is critical for the validity of appeals and habeas corpus petitions.
Source document (simplified)
Jump To
Top Caption Disposition Lead Opinion The text of this document was obtained by analyzing a scanned document and may have typos.
Support FLP
CourtListener is a project of Free
Law Project, a federally-recognized 501(c)(3) non-profit. Members help support our work and get special access to features.
Please become a member today.
March 5, 2026 Get Citation Alerts Download PDF Add Note
Antoine Demetruis DeGrate v. the State of Texas
Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)
- Citations: None known
- Docket Number: 10-26-00047-CR
- Nature of Suit: Failure to Register as a Sex Offender
Disposition: Dismissed
Disposition
Dismissed
Lead Opinion
Court of Appeals
Tenth Appellate District of Texas
10-26-00046-CR
10-26-00047-CR
Antoine Demetruis DeGrate,
Appellant
v.
The State of Texas,
Appellee
On appeal from the
19th District Court of McLennan County, Texas
Judge Thomas C. West, presiding
Trial Court Cause Nos. 2013-1551-C1, 2013-1152-C1
JUSTICE HARRIS delivered the opinion of the Court.
MEMORANDUM OPINION
On January 21, 2026, Antoine Demetruis Degrate filed appeals in the
trial court of his three convictions from guilty pleas where the sentence was
imposed on February 10, 2014. By letters from the Clerk dated February 5,
2026, DeGrate was advised that the notices of appeal appeared to be untimely
and was directed to file a response with this Court showing grounds for
continuing the appeal. DeGrate filed a response in appellate Cause No. 10-26-
00047-CR in which he appears to be attempting to file a writ of habeas corpus
pursuant to article 11.07 of the Code of Criminal Procedure.
Direct appeal is not a proper mechanism to raise the claims DeGrate is
attempting to pursue. Additionally, this Court does not have jurisdiction over
a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to article 11.07. See TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC.
art. 11.07, Sec. 3. Therefore, we do not have jurisdiction over these appeals,
and they are dismissed for want of jurisdiction.
LEE HARRIS
Justice
OPINION DELIVERED and FILED: March 5, 2026
Before Chief Justice Johnson,
Justice Smith, and
Justice Harris
Appeals dismissed
Do not publish
CRPM (10-26-00046-CR)
CR25 (10-26-00047-CR)
DeGrate v. State Page 2
Related changes
Source
Classification
Who this affects
Taxonomy
Browse Categories
Get State Courts alerts
Weekly digest. AI-summarized, no noise.
Free. Unsubscribe anytime.
Get alerts for this source
We'll email you when Texas Court of Appeals publishes new changes.