People v. Marquis - Appellate Division Court Opinion
Summary
The Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York affirmed a judgment from the Supreme Court, Bronx County, in the case of People v. Marquis. The court found the sentence imposed was not excessive.
What changed
The Appellate Division, First Department, has affirmed a judgment against Shawn Marquis, stemming from Indictment No. 770/19 and Appeal No. 5992. The court reviewed the appeal from a judgment rendered by Supreme Court, Bronx County, on February 10, 2022, and found that the sentence imposed was not excessive, leading to the affirmation of the lower court's decision. The decision was officially entered on March 3, 2026.
This ruling means the conviction and sentence stand as originally determined. Counsel for the appellant is directed to refer to Section 606.5 of the Rules of the Appellate Division, First Department. There are no immediate compliance actions required for regulated entities beyond standard legal practice, as this is a specific case outcome rather than a new regulatory mandate.
Source document (simplified)
Jump To
Support FLP
CourtListener is a project of Free
Law Project, a federally-recognized 501(c)(3) non-profit. Members help support our work and get special access to features.
Please become a member today.
March 3, 2026 Get Citation Alerts Add Note
People v. Marquis
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
- Citations: 2026 NY Slip Op 01172
Docket Number: Ind. No. 770/19; Appeal No. 5992; Case No. 2023-00459
Combined Opinion
People v Marquis (2026 NY Slip Op 01172)
| People v Marquis |
| 2026 NY Slip Op 01172 |
| Decided on March 03, 2026 |
| Appellate Division, First Department |
| Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. |
| This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports. |
Decided and Entered: March 03, 2026
Before: Webber, J.P., Shulman, Higgitt, Rosado, Hagler, JJ.
Ind. No. 770/19|Appeal No. 5992|Case No. 2023-00459|
*[1]The People of The State of New York, Respondent,
v
Shawn Marquis, Defendant-Appellant.**
Jenay Nurse Guilford, Center for Appellate Litigation, New York (Shaina Watrous of counsel), for appellant.
Darcel D. Clark, District Attorney, Bronx (Cynthia A. Carlson of counsel), for respondent.
An appeal having been taken to this Court by the above-named appellant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Bronx County (Margaret L. Clancy, J.), rendered February 10, 2022,
Said appeal having been argued by counsel for the respective parties, due deliberation having been had thereon, and finding the sentence not excessive,
It is unanimously ordered that the judgment so appealed from be and the same is hereby affirmed.
THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.
ENTERED: March 3, 2026
Counsel for appellant is referred to § 606.5, Rules of the Appellate Division, First Department.
Related changes
Source
Classification
Who this affects
Taxonomy
Browse Categories
Get State Courts alerts
Weekly digest. AI-summarized, no noise.
Free. Unsubscribe anytime.
Get alerts for this source
We'll email you when New York Appellate Division publishes new changes.