Weeks v. Warner - Order Denying Reconsideration

Hawaii Supreme Court

Filed March 2nd, 2026

Detected March 3rd, 2026

Summary

The Intermediate Court of Appeals of the State of Hawaii denied a motion for reconsideration filed by Defendant-Appellant Eugene Warner in the case of Weeks v. Warner. The court found the request to be untimely under Hawaii Rules of Appellate Procedure Rule 40(a).

View original document View source feed page

What changed

The Intermediate Court of Appeals of the State of Hawaii has issued an order denying a motion for reconsideration filed by Defendant-Appellant Eugene Warner in the case of Debra A. Weeks v. Eugene Warner. The court determined that Warner's submission, construed as a request for reconsideration of the prior order dismissing the appeal, was untimely filed according to Hawaii Rules of Appellate Procedure Rule 40(a).

This order signifies the final disposition of Warner's attempt to have the appeal reconsidered. No further actions are required from regulated entities as this pertains to a specific court case. The denial of reconsideration means the prior order dismissing the appeal stands, and the case will not be reheard on appeal based on the reconsideration request.

Source document (simplified)

NOT FOR PUBLICATION I N WEST'S HAWAI I REPORTS AND PACIFIC REPORTER Electronically Filed Intermediate Court of Appeals CAAP-24-0000378 02-MAR-2026 09:45 AM Dkt. 97 ODMR NO. CAAP-24-0000378 IN THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF HAWAI I DEBRA A. WEEKS, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. EUGENE WARNER, Defendant-Appellant APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE THIRD CIRCUIT NORTH & SOUTH HILO DIVISION (CASE NO. 3DRC-24-0001042) ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION (By: Nakasone, Chief Judge, Leonard and Wadsworth, JJ.) On February 3, 2026, the Intermediate Court of Appeals entered the Order Dismissing Appeal. On February 25, 2026, Defendant-Appellant Eugene Warner (Warner) filed "Notic [sic] of Order from Republic's Notarial Protest Court to Hawaii Democracy's De Facto Tribunal to be Reviewed En Banc," which is difficult to discern, along with an exhibit a nd a Proof of Service. In light of the procedural posture of this case, and upon review of the February 25, 2026 submissions and the entire record on appeal, we construe these submissions as requesting reconsideration of the February 3, 2026 Order Dismissing Appeal. Warner's request for reconsideration is untimely. See Hawai i Rules of Appellate Procedure Rule 40(a). Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Warner's request for reconsideration, as

NOT FOR PUBLICATION I N WEST'S HAWAI I REPORTS AND PACIFIC REPORTER well as any other relief requested in the February 25, 2026 submissions, are DENIED. DATED: Honolulu, Hawai i, March 2, 2026. /s/ Karen T. Nakasone Chief Judge /s/ Katherine G. Leonard Associate Judge /s/ Clyde J. Wadsworth Associate Judge 2