Changeflow GovPing State Courts State v. Kauhola - Appeal Dismissal Order
Routine Enforcement Removed Final

State v. Kauhola - Appeal Dismissal Order

Favicon for www.courts.state.hi.us Hawaii Supreme Court
Filed February 27th, 2026
Detected March 2nd, 2026
Email

Summary

The Intermediate Court of Appeals of the State of Hawai'i has approved a stipulation to dismiss the appeal in State of Hawai'i v. Ainsley Anthony Apuakehau Kauhola. The dismissal is with prejudice, and no attorneys' fees or costs are outstanding.

What changed

The Intermediate Court of Appeals of the State of Hawai'i issued an order approving a stipulation to dismiss the appeal in State of Hawai'i v. Ainsley Anthony Apuakehau Kauhola (Case No. CAAP-25-0000508). The dismissal, based on Hawai'i Rules of Appellate Procedure Rule 42(b) and (c), is with prejudice and signifies the voluntary withdrawal of the appeal by the defendant-appellant, who understands the consequences.

This order finalizes the dismissal of the appeal. For legal professionals involved in appellate cases, this serves as an example of the procedural requirements for stipulating to a dismissal, including the need for a voluntary declaration from the appellant and the court's approval. No further action is required by regulated entities as this pertains to a specific court case resolution.

Source document (simplified)

NOT FOR PUBLICATION I N WEST'S HAWAI I REPORTS AND PACIFIC REPORTER Electronically Filed Intermediate Court of Appeals CAAP-25-0000508 27-FEB-2026 08:38 AM Dkt. 38 OAWST NO. CAAP-25-0000508 IN THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF HAWAI I STATE OF HAWAI I, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. AINSLEY ANTHONY APUAKEHAU KAUHOLA, Defendant-Appellant APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE SECOND CIRCUIT (CASE NO. 2CPC-25-0000104) ORDER APPROVING STIPULATION TO DISMISS APPEAL (By: Nakasone, Chief Judge, Leonard and McCullen, JJ.) Upon consideration of the Stipulation for Dismissal of Appeal and Order (Stipulation), filed on February 25, 2026, by Defendant-Appellant Ainsley Kauhola (Kauhola), it appears that (1) the appeal has been docketed and the filing fees have been paid; (2) under Hawai i Rules of Appellate Procedure (HRAP) Rule 42(b), the parties stipulate to dismiss the appeal, with no attorneys' fees or costs outstanding; (3) the Stipulation is signed by counsel for all parties; and (4) pursuant to HRAP Rule 42(c), the Stipulation is accompanied by Kauhola's declaration attesting that the withdrawal is being made voluntarily, and that he understands the consequences of dismissal of the appeal. Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Stipulation is approved and the appeal is dismissed with prejudice. DATED: Honolulu, Hawai i, February 27, 2026. /s/ Karen T. Nakasone Chief Judge /s/ Katherine G. Leonard Associate Judge /s/ Sonja M.P. McCullen Associate Judge

Source

Analysis generated by AI. Source diff and links are from the original.

Classification

Agency
Federal and State Courts
Filed
February 27th, 2026
Instrument
Enforcement
Legal weight
Binding
Stage
Final
Change scope
Minor

Who this affects

Applies to
Courts Legal professionals
Geographic scope
National (US)

Taxonomy

Primary area
Judicial Administration
Operational domain
Legal
Topics
Appellate Procedure

Get State Courts alerts

Weekly digest. AI-summarized, no noise.

Free. Unsubscribe anytime.

Get alerts for this source

We'll email you when Hawaii Supreme Court publishes new changes.

Free. Unsubscribe anytime.