Fulton v. State of Delaware - Compassionate Release Application Denied
Summary
The Delaware Superior Court summarily denied Gene L. Fulton's application for compassionate release. The court found that Fulton did not meet the statutory requirements for release under 11 Del. C. § 4217, as he had not yet served the mandatory portion of his sentence and had behavioral management concerns.
What changed
The Delaware Superior Court, in an order dated February 12, 2026, summarily dismissed Gene L. Fulton's application for compassionate release under 11 Del. C. § 4217. The court determined that Fulton did not meet the criteria for release, specifically noting that he had not served the required 15 years of his sentence and that his application was not solely based on rehabilitation. Furthermore, Fulton's disciplinary record and lack of rehabilitative progress, as indicated by the Department of Corrections, disqualified him from relief.
This decision means that Fulton's request for early release has been denied, and he is prohibited from refiling a similar application for three years. The ruling reinforces the strict eligibility requirements for compassionate release in Delaware, emphasizing the need to meet specific sentence completion and behavioral criteria. For legal professionals and defendants, this highlights the importance of carefully assessing eligibility before filing such applications.
What to do next
- Review eligibility criteria for compassionate release under 11 Del. C. § 4217 for any pending or future applications.
- Ensure all applications for compassionate release are supported by documentation demonstrating fulfillment of statutory requirements, including sentence completion and rehabilitative progress.
Penalties
Defendant prohibited from refiling application for three (3) years.
Source document (simplified)
THE SUPERIO R COURT OF THE ST ATE OF DEL AWARE STATE OF DEL AWARE,))) v.) I.D. No. 150 8009967)) GENE L. FULTO N,)) Defendant.) Date Submitte d: February 5, 2026 Date Decided: Febr uary 12, 20 26 ORDER ON DE FENDANT’S APPLIC ATION FOR COM PASSIONATE RELEASE – SUM MARILY DENIE D IT IS SO O RDERED this 12th day of February, 202 6, that Defenda nt’s Application for Compa ssionate Release pursua nt to 11 Del. C. § 4217, be SUMMARIL Y DISMISSED. 1 1. Fulton was sentenced on April 29, 2016, to fifteen years at Level V, with no p robation to follow, pur suant to 11 Del. C. § 4214(b) for Burglary in the Second Degree, 2 and two years at Level V, suspended immediately fo r decreasin g levels of superv ision, for Theft fr om a Senior. 3 1 11 De l. C. § 4217(b)(6). 2 State v. Gene Fulton, 1509009967, Docket Item (here inafter “D.I.”) 17. 3 Id.
- On Ja nuary 27, 2026, pursuant to 11 Del. C. § 4217, Fulton app lied for modification of his sentence seeking co mpassiona te release. This newly enacte d avenue for sentence modification allows a certain classification of incarcerate d inmates to so m ove the Court under a limited and defined set o f circumstances. 4 This Section perm its summary dism issal of suc h applications when these s trictly defined circumstanc es are not met by the m ovant. 5 3. Summary dismissal, pursuant to 11 Del. C. § 4217(b)(6) is warranted here in that Fulton, while over the age of 60, has not yet served 15 years of his original sentence. 6 Further, Fulton’s application is not based “solely” on rehabilitation; Fulton as serts l egal argument in his re quest for compa ssionate relief. 7 4. The total amount o f Level V incarcera tion to which Fult on was sentenced is fifteen (15) years. As a result, Fulton will be released at the triggering time prescribed by Sect ion 4217 and i t is t herefore legally not possible for him to qualify for the rel ief under thi s area of the la w. 5. Further, Fulton is serving a statutorily mandated term of incarceration at Level V for a Title 11 conviction, Burglary Second Degree, 8 and has not yet served 4 See generally, 11 Del. C. § 4217. 5 11 De l. C. 4217(b)(6) 6 11 De l. C. 4217(a)(3)b. 7 Id. 8 11 De l. C. § 825
all of the statutoril y mandated portion of his sentenc e. This further dis qualifies him from relief under § 4217. 9 6. While Fulton appropriate ly attach ed a copy of the Department of Corrections wri tten statement 10 to his amen ded motion, this s tatement in dicates tha t in the opinion of the Department, Fulton is not eligible for relief under 11 De l. C. § 4217 because he: 1. “Has been a be havior managem ent concern/n on -compliant w ith institutional ru les and responsi bilities.” 2. “Lacks favorab le rehabilitative progress; lack s consistency in demonstrating rehab ilitation throug h institutional c ompliance, program partic ipation, and mai ntaining positive be havior.” 3. “Has not complet ed the require d Level 5 senten ce identified i n 1 1 Del. C. § 4217 and/ or by the Court’ s order regarding s pecial conditio ns or treatment w hile at L V5.” 11 7. Fulton is therefore ineligible for relief under 11 Del. C. § 4217 and his Application is SUMM ARILY DISMISS ED. 8. Finally, and for t he aforementione d reasons, Fulton’s application lacks good cause and invok es 11 Del. C. § 4217(c)(4). Fulton is therefore prohibited from refiling any su bsequent applica tion for three (3) y ears, especia lly given that an y 9 See 11 Del. C. § 4217(a)(5). 10 11 De l. C. § 4217(b)(3). 11 D.I. 47.
future filing w ould be futile. IT IS SO ORDE RED. _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ The Honorable Danielle J. Bre nnan Cc: Barzilai Axelr od, Esquire, De puty Attorne y General Gene Fulton (SBI: 00160379), Pro Se Heather Hamlet & R obert May, Department of C orrections Original to Cr iminal Prothono tary
Related changes
Source
Classification
Who this affects
Taxonomy
Browse Categories
Get State Courts alerts
Weekly digest. AI-summarized, no noise.
Free. Unsubscribe anytime.
Get alerts for this source
We'll email you when DE Superior Court Opinions publishes new changes.