Final Judgment Against Peter Quartararo for $249,000 Offering Fraud
Summary
On March 31, 2026, the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York entered a final judgment by default against defendant Peter Quartararo for an offering fraud scheme. Quartararo was permanently enjoined from violating Section 17(a) of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10b-5. In a parallel criminal action, Quartararo pleaded guilty and was sentenced to two and a half to seven and a half years in prison with $249,000 in restitution ordered.
What changed
The U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York entered a final judgment by default against Peter Quartararo on March 31, 2026, permanently enjoining him from violating Section 17(a) of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10b-5. The SEC's complaint, filed April 27, 2021, alleged that Quartararo defrauded investors by falsely claiming he could sell them shares in privately-held companies expected to increase in value upon IPO, while actually stealing the funds for personal benefit. In a parallel criminal case, Quartararo pleaded guilty and was sentenced to 2.5-7.5 years in prison.
Affected parties, including investment advisers, broker-dealers, and individuals involved in private securities offerings, should note that this case demonstrates coordinated SEC and criminal enforcement for investor fraud schemes. The permanent injunction creates ongoing compliance obligations, and the $249,000 restitution order underscores the financial consequences of securities fraud.
What to do next
- Comply with permanent injunction against securities law violations
- Pay restitution of $249,000 as ordered in criminal proceeding
Penalties
Restitution of $249,000; 2.5 to 7.5 years imprisonment (criminal)
Archived snapshot
Apr 16, 2026GovPing captured this document from the original source. If the source has since changed or been removed, this is the text as it existed at that time.
Peter R. Quartararo
U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Litigation Release No. 26527 / April 15, 2026
Securities and Exchange Commission v. Quartararo, No. 21-civ-02305 (E.D.N.Y filed Apr. 27, 2021)
SEC Obtains Final Judgment Against Peter Quartararo in Offering Fraud Scheme
On March 31, 2026, the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York entered a final judgment by default against defendant Peter Quartararo in connection with previously-filed fraud charges.
The SEC’s complaint, filed on April 27, 2021, alleged that Quartararo engaged in a scheme to defraud investors by falsely claiming that he could sell them shares in well-known privately-held companies, which were expected to increase in value when those companies completed their initial public offerings. As alleged, Quartararo never purchased or held pre-IPO shares in these companies on behalf of the investors. Instead, Quartararo allegedly stole the funds and used them for his personal benefit.
The final judgment permanently enjoins Quartararo from violating Section 17(a) of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10b-5 thereunder.
Previously, on February 9, 2024, in the parallel criminal action, New York v. Quartararo, No. 70204/23 (Sup. Ct. NY.), Quartararo pleaded guilty to scheme to defraud and other criminal charges, and was later sentenced to two and a half to seven and a half years in prison and ordered to pay restitution in the amount of $249,000.
The SEC’s investigation was conducted by Bennett Ellenbogen, Elizabeth Baier, and Lindsay S. Moilanen, and supervised by Thomas P. Smith, Jr. The litigation was led by Todd Brody and Mr. Ellenbogen and was supervised by Daniel Loss. The SEC appreciates the assistance of the Nassau County District Attorney’s Office.
Resources
Named provisions
Related changes
Get daily alerts for SEC Litigation Releases
Daily digest delivered to your inbox.
Free. Unsubscribe anytime.
About this page
Every important government, regulator, and court update from around the world. One place. Real-time. Free. Our mission
Source document text, dates, docket IDs, and authority are extracted directly from SEC.
The summary, classification, recommended actions, deadlines, and penalty information are AI-generated from the original text and may contain errors. Always verify against the source document.
Classification
Who this affects
Taxonomy
Browse Categories
Get alerts for this source
We'll email you when SEC Litigation Releases publishes new changes.
Subscribed!
Optional. Filters your digest to exactly the updates that matter to you.