ASIC Continues Finfluencer Crackdown Alongside 16 Global Regulators
Summary
ASIC has issued warning notices to four finfluencers suspected of providing unlicensed financial advice or engaging in misleading or deceptive conduct, including promoting guaranteed returns claims. As part of the second Global Week of Action Against Unlawful Finfluencers, ASIC reviewed three AFS licensees and their supervision of 15 finfluencers operating as authorised representatives. ASIC emphasised that finfluencers must hold an AFS licence or operate as authorised representatives to legally provide financial product advice, with unlicensed finfluencers facing up to five years imprisonment or million-dollar fines.
AFS licensees authorising finfluencers should verify their supervisory arrangements against ASIC's requirements under INFO 269: documented oversight procedures, active monitoring of online content, and maintained records of supervision. The coordinated action across 17 regulators signals that supervisory failures will attract enforcement scrutiny, as demonstrated by the prior Pulse Markets cancellation and Sanlam enforceable undertaking.
About this source
GovPing monitors ASIC Media Releases for new securities & markets regulatory changes. Every update since tracking began is archived, classified, and available as free RSS or email alerts — 19 changes logged to date.
What changed
ASIC has taken coordinated enforcement action against finfluencers suspected of providing unlicensed financial advice or engaging in misleading or deceptive conduct. Warning notices were issued to four finfluencers, and three AFS licensees are under review for supervising 15 finfluencers operating as authorised representatives. ASIC's Information Sheet 269 sets out how financial services laws apply to social media influencers, making clear that finfluencers must either hold an AFS licence or operate as authorised representatives.
AFS licensees authorising finfluencers should review ASIC's supervisory expectations: adequate documented arrangements to actively supervise conduct, maintained records of supervision, and active oversight rather than a set-and-forget approach. The coordinated global enforcement action signals heightened regulatory scrutiny of finfluencer activity internationally, making this an opportune time for licensees to audit their finfluencer oversight programs before ASIC takes enforcement action for supervisory failures.
Penalties
Unlicensed finfluencers: up to five years imprisonment or million-dollar fines
Archived snapshot
Apr 24, 2026GovPing captured this document from the original source. If the source has since changed or been removed, this is the text as it existed at that time.
Print Share ASIC is working alongside 16 global regulators as part of its crackdown on unlawful social media ‘finfluencers’, amid growing concern about the influence of financial information online, particularly among younger Australians.
Warning notices have been issued to four finfluencers suspected of providing unlicensed financial advice or engaging in misleading or deceptive conduct. ASIC has also commenced a review of several Australian Financial Services (AFS) licensees and their supervision of 15 finfluencers operating under their licences.
The action is intended to disrupt unlawful finfluencer online promotion before consumers suffer financial harm.
The warning notices to the four finfluencers relate to suspected provision of unlicensed financial advice, including promoting claims of guaranteed returns, which may also be misleading or deceptive.
ASIC’s action formed part of the second Global Week of Action Against Unlawful Finfluencers, involving 17 regulators globally, including ASIC, across Asia, Europe, North America, South America and the Middle East to disrupt unlawful online financial promotion and warn consumers about misinformation.
The continued crackdown reflects ASIC’s concern about the growing influence of social media on financial decision making.
Recent Moneysmart research shows that 63% of Gen Z Australians (aged 18–28) rely on social media for financial information, with more than half saying they somewhat or completely trust financial information on social media (56%) and from finfluencers (52%) (26-049MR).
ASIC Commissioner Alan Kirkland said, ‘Unlawful finfluencer activity doesn’t respect borders, which is why regulators are taking strong action together for a second year in a row.
‘What people see online is shaped by algorithms designed to drive clicks and engagement, rather than promoting accurate information. This means consumers are more exposed to biased or misleading content,’ Mr Kirkland said.
ASIC’s surveillance focused on finfluencers targeting Australian investors and discussing a range of financial products, including leveraged derivatives, shares and exchange-traded funds.
Commissioner Kirkland continued, ‘Finfluencers must either hold an AFS licence or operate as an authorised representative to legally provide financial product advice or arrange for their followers to deal in financial products.
‘When viewing financial content on social media, we urge Australians to check a creator’s credentials, and sense‑check the information before acting on it.
‘If someone on social media is promising easy money or guaranteed returns, there is a real risk they’re breaking the law, and you could be the one who loses money,’ Mr Kirkland said.
Consumers and investors can check whether a person or business is licensed or authorised using ASIC’s professional registers search tool.
ASIC reminds licensees of their obligations
For the first time since issuing Information Sheet 269 Discussing financial products and services online (INFO 269) in 2022, ASIC is reminding licensees about their supervisory obligations when engaging finfluencers.
Under these arrangements, unlicensed finfluencers may operate as authorised representatives of AFS licensees, however responsibility for supervising finfluencer conduct and the liability for any breaches remains with the licensee.
As part of this, ASIC has contacted and met with three AFS licensees to review their supervision of 15 finfluencers operating as authorised representatives and reminding them of their legal supervisory obligations.
ASIC expects licensees that authorise finfluencers to have adequate, documented arrangements in place to actively supervise their conduct, and to maintain records of that supervision.
‘Licensees remain responsible and liable for what their representatives say and do online,’ Mr Kirkland said.
‘We expect active supervision, not a set‑and‑forget approach.’
ASIC will continue monitoring social media activity and may take enforcement action where finfluencer conduct or licensee failures place Australian consumers at risk.
Australians should always check whether a person or business is licensed or authorised before acting on financial advice they see online.
‘If a social media influencer isn’t licensed or authorised, they cannot offer financial advice in Australia and could face up to five years’ imprisonment or million-dollar fines,’ Mr Kirkland said.
Moneysmart provides free, independent information to help consumers make informed decisions.
Suspected unlicensed finfluencer activity can be reported to ASIC via the Reporting misconduct to ASIC webpage, or by calling 1300 300 630, so that ASIC can consider appropriate regulatory action.
Downloads
- Template letter to suspected unlawful finfluencers (DOCX 253 KB)
- Template letter to AFS licensees (DOCX 248 KB)
- Graphic: Finfluencer red flags (PNG 1.6 MB)
Background
Financial services laws protect investors and promote market integrity. They set minimum requirements and provide important protections for investors if something goes wrong.
ASIC monitors select online financial discussion by influencers who feature or promote financial products for any misleading or deceptive representations or unlicensed financial services.
In March 2026, ASIC urges Gen Z to ‘sense-check’ money advice as social media fuels riskier financial decisions (26-049MR).
ASIC has previously taken action against licensees who have failed to maintain their licensing supervisory arrangements.
- In February 2026, ASIC cancelled the AFS licence of Pulse Markets Pty Ltd for, amongst other things, failing to take reasonable steps to ensure its representatives comply with financial services laws (26-027MR).
- In December 2024, Sanlam Private Wealth Pty Ltd accepted a Court Enforceable Undertaking following an ASIC investigation for failing to supervise its 113 representatives (24-290MR). ASIC issued Information Sheet 269: Discussing financial products and services online (INFO 269) in March 2022, outlining how the financial services laws apply to social media influencers and the obligations of AFS licensees that engage them.
In addition to ASIC, the 16 regulators involved in the Global Week of Action Against Unlawful Finfluencers included:
- Belgium, Financial Services and Markets Authority
- Brazil, Comissão de Valores Mobiliários
- Canada, British Columbia, British Columbia Securities Commission
- Canada, Ontario, Ontario Securities Commission
- Canada, Quebec, Autorité des marchés financiers
- Denmark, Financial Supervisory Authority
- Hong Kong, Securities and Futures Commission
- India, Securities & Exchange Board of India
- Ireland, Central Bank of Ireland
- New Zealand, Financial Markets Authority
- Norway, Finanstilsynet
- Qatar, Qatar Financial Markets Authority
- Qatar, Qatar Financial Centre Regulatory Authority
- Singapore, Monetary Authority of Singapore
- United Arab Emirates, Capital & Markets Authority
United Kingdom, Financial Conduct Authority
Following ASIC’s 2025 action against 18 suspected unlawful finfluencers (news item):several became authorised representatives
others amended their content or ceased targeting Australian consumers, and
offshore operators remain under scrutiny.
**
ASIC is Australia’s corporate, markets and financial services regulator.
Named provisions
Related changes
Get daily alerts for ASIC Media Releases
Daily digest delivered to your inbox.
Free. Unsubscribe anytime.
About this page
Every important government, regulator, and court update from around the world. One place. Real-time. Free. Our mission
Source document text, dates, docket IDs, and authority are extracted directly from ASIC.
The summary, classification, recommended actions, deadlines, and penalty information are AI-generated from the original text and may contain errors. Always verify against the source document.
Classification
Who this affects
Taxonomy
Browse Categories
Get alerts for this source
We'll email you when ASIC Media Releases publishes new changes.
Subscribed!
Optional. Filters your digest to exactly the updates that matter to you.