Search

Buksh v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship - Bogus Document Appeal Allowed

The Federal Court of Australia allowed Farid Buksh's appeal against a decision upholding visa refusal based on a 'bogus document'. The Court held that the Tribunal misconstrued the definition of 'bogus document' in section 5 of the Migration Act 1958 (Cth), finding that 'counterfeit' refers to a document that is not what it purports to be — not a document that is authentic but contains inaccurate information. The decision of the Administrative Appeals Tribunal dated 16 June 2022 has been quashed and proceedings remitted for redetermination. The Minister for Immigration and Citizenship was ordered to pay the applicant's costs.

Feng v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship — PIC 4020 False Information Appeal Allowed

The Federal Court of Australia allowed an appeal by Chiu-He Feng against a decision of the Administrative Appeals Tribunal concerning Public Interest Criterion 4020 (PIC 4020). The Court found the Tribunal had erred in its construction of PIC 4020, which requires that information be 'purposely untrue' and that 'an element of fraud or deception' is necessary — not merely indifference to accuracy. The Tribunal's decision of 26 November 2020 is quashed and the matter remitted to the Administrative Review Tribunal for determination according to law. The Minister for Immigration and Citizenship is ordered to pay costs.