The Montana Supreme Court reversed the Eighth Judicial District Court's dismissal of Kalafat's petition challenging the suspension of his driver's license under Montana's implied-consent law. The District Court had ruled the matter moot because Kalafat's six-month suspension ended by operation of law and his license was reinstated. The Supreme Court held that the District Court erred, finding that judicial review of a license suspension remains a live controversy even after the suspension period expires because the court could have ordered refund of reinstatement fees and addressed constitutional Fourth Amendment claims raised by Kalafat.