Searching in Federal Courts · Search everything

1,460 changes

Favicon for www.courtlistener.com

Flummerfelt v. City of Taylor - Sovereign Immunity Appeal

The Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's denial of sovereign immunity for the Wayne County Treasurer in Flummerfelt v. City of Taylor. The court clarified that the suit was against Wayne County, not its treasurer, rendering the treasurer's sovereign immunity defense irrelevant.

Routine Enforcement Government Contracting
Favicon for www.courtlistener.com

Westerling v. E. Tenn. Children's Hosp. Ass'n, Inc. - FLSA Overtime Dispute

The Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed a lower court's decision in Westerling v. E. Tenn. Children's Hosp. Ass'n, Inc., dismissing a Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) overtime claim. The court found that the plaintiff failed to adequately allege that he was not completely relieved of duties during meal breaks.

Routine Enforcement Employment & Labor
Favicon for www.courtlistener.com

Fadi Abi Fakhreddine v. Eric Sabree - Court Opinion

The Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's dismissal of a complaint filed by Fadi Fakhreddine and Old Joy Investment Company against Wayne County Treasurer Eric Sabree. The plaintiffs alleged violations of the Fifth Amendment's Takings Clause after their properties were foreclosed due to unpaid property taxes.

Routine Enforcement Real Estate
Favicon for www.courtlistener.com

Mary Bleick v. Sheryl Maxfield - Unclaimed Funds Act Appeal

The Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed a lower court's decision denying a preliminary injunction to prevent the transfer of unclaimed funds to the state of Ohio. The ruling upholds Ohio's Unclaimed Funds Act, which allows funds held for ten years or more to escheat to the state.

Routine Enforcement Consumer Protection
Favicon for www.ded.uscourts.gov

Pfizer v. Dexcel Pharma Technologies - Court Opinion on Expert Testimony

The US District Court for the District of Delaware denied a motion by Defendants Cipla Limited and Hikma Pharmaceuticals USA Inc. to exclude expert testimony in the patent infringement case Pfizer v. Dexcel Pharma Technologies. The court's memorandum opinion addresses the admissibility of Dr. Adam Matzger's testimony concerning infringement of the '441 patent.

Routine Enforcement Pharmaceuticals
Favicon for www.cand.uscourts.gov

A.C. v. United States - Civil Case Filing

A new civil case, A.C. v. United States of America (Federal Bureau of Prisons) et al, was filed on March 10, 2026, in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. The case number is 3:26-cv-02076. The initial filings include a complaint, proposed summons, and motions related to anonymity and proceeding before a US Magistrate Judge.

Routine Enforcement Judicial Administration
Favicon for www.ca9.uscourts.gov

B.B. v. Capistrano Unified School District - First Amendment Student Speech

The Ninth Circuit vacated a district court's grant of summary judgment in B.B. v. Capistrano Unified School District, holding that elementary students' speech is protected by the First Amendment under the Tinker standard. The court remanded the case, finding genuine disputes of material fact regarding whether the school principal's actions were reasonably necessary to prevent disruption or protect other students.

Priority review Enforcement Civil Rights
Favicon for www.ca9.uscourts.gov

Rojas-Espinoza v. Bondi - Motion to Stay Removal Denied

The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals denied a motion to stay removal for petitioners Rojas-Espinoza and others in their case against Pamela Bondi. The court lifted a temporary stay of removal, effective immediately. A concurring opinion addressed procedural concerns regarding the court's handling of stay practices.

Priority review Enforcement Immigration
Favicon for www.ca5.uscourts.gov

Deras v. Johnson & Johnson - FLSA Unpaid Wages Case

The Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals vacated the district court's dismissal of Francisco Deras's FLSA unpaid wages case against Johnson & Johnson. The appellate court remanded the case for further proceedings, finding the district court's interpretation of local rules and precedent regarding attorney procedural errors to be overly broad.

Priority review Enforcement Employment & Labor
Favicon for www.cand.uscourts.gov

S.B.01 v. Uber Technologies, Inc. et al - Personal Injury Product Liability

A new civil case, S.B.01 v. Uber Technologies, Inc. et al, has been filed in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. The case, bearing number 3:26-cv-02064, is based on diversity jurisdiction and involves a claim of personal injury product liability. The initial complaint and related documents were filed on March 10, 2026.

Routine Enforcement Judicial Administration

Showing 361–370 of 1,460 changes

1 35 36 37 38 39 146

Get alerts for ""

We'll email you when new changes match this search.

Free. Unsubscribe anytime.