Searching in Federal Courts · Search everything

1,456 changes

Favicon for www.courtlistener.com

Sklar Exploration Company Case - Motion to Dismiss Granted

The US Bankruptcy Court for the District of Colorado granted a motion to dismiss one of four breach of contract claims filed by the Creditor Trustee against Sklar Exploration Company, LLC and Sklarco LLC. The ruling concerns provisions of the Debtors' confirmed Plan of Reorganization.

Routine Enforcement Bankruptcy
Favicon for www.ca9.uscourts.gov

Ninth Circuit Denies Rehearing En Banc in TPS Case

The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals denied a petition for rehearing en banc in National TPS Alliance v. Noem. The court affirmed its prior order, which found that judicial review is available for the vacatur and termination of Temporary Protected Status (TPS) for Haiti and Venezuela by former DHS Secretary Kristi Noem.

Priority review Enforcement Immigration
Favicon for www.ca9.uscourts.gov

Hudacko v. Regents of UC - Rehearing Denied

The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals has denied a petition for rehearing in the case of Hudacko v. Regents of the University of California. The court's order indicates that neither panel rehearing nor en banc rehearing was granted.

Routine Enforcement Judicial Administration
Favicon for www.ca9.uscourts.gov

Ninth Circuit Reverses, Vacates District Court Ruling on ADA Damages

The Ninth Circuit reversed and vacated a district court's ruling on damages in a disability discrimination case under Title II of the ADA. The court reinstated a jury's award of $218,500 to one plaintiff and $24,000 to another, finding the district court abused its discretion in reducing the damages.

Priority review Enforcement Civil Rights
Favicon for www.cand.uscourts.gov

Roe v. United States of America - Civil Rights

A new civil case, Roe v. United States of America, was filed on March 11, 2026, in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. The case involves civil rights claims against the Federal Bureau of Prisons and other U.S. government entities. The filing fee was $405.

Routine Enforcement Civil Rights
3d ago NDGA Opinions
Favicon for www.courtlistener.com

Beasley v. Georgia Department of Public Safety - Race Discrimination Claims Dismissed

The Northern District of Georgia dismissed race discrimination claims brought by Torrence Beasley against the Georgia Department of Public Safety and Trooper Evan Johnson. The court granted the defendants' motion to dismiss, though it noted a portion of the claims were dismissed for lack of subject matter jurisdiction.

Routine Enforcement Civil Rights
3d ago NDGA Opinions
Favicon for www.courtlistener.com

Earl Parris Jr. v. 3M Company - Clean Water Act Case

The U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Georgia denied a joint motion to exclude expert testimony in the case of Earl Parris Jr. v. 3M Company. This case involves alleged contamination of surface and drinking water with PFAS substances under the Clean Water Act.

Priority review Enforcement Environmental Protection
Favicon for www.cand.uscourts.gov

Roe v. United States of America - Civil Rights

A civil rights case, Roe v. United States of America (Federal Bureau of Prisons), was filed on March 11, 2026, in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. The filing includes a complaint and proposed summons. The case is assigned docket number 4:26-cv-02115.

Routine Enforcement Civil Rights
Favicon for ww3.ca2.uscourts.gov

Sacaza v. City of New York - Qualified Immunity Appeal

The Second Circuit Court of Appeals reversed a lower court's denial of summary judgment for a New York City detective in a false arrest and malicious prosecution case. The court found that the detective had arguable probable cause, granting him qualified immunity on federal claims.

Priority review Enforcement Civil Rights
Favicon for ww3.ca2.uscourts.gov

GEICO v. Mayzenberg - Insurance No-Fault Benefits Dispute

The Second Circuit vacated a district court judgment in favor of GEICO, remanding the case of GEICO v. Mayzenberg. The court's decision was based on a certified question answered by the New York Court of Appeals, which clarified that an insurer cannot deny no-fault benefits based solely on alleged professional misconduct not amounting to ceding control of a professional services corporation to an unlicensed party.

Priority review Enforcement Insurance

Showing 271–280 of 1,456 changes

1 26 27 28 29 30 146

Get alerts for ""

We'll email you when new changes match this search.

Free. Unsubscribe anytime.