Searching in Federal Courts · Search everything

1,394 changes

Favicon for www.cand.uscourts.gov

Agrawal et al v. Edlow et al - Other Immigration Actions

A new civil case, Agrawal et al v. Edlow et al (Case 5:26-cv-01400), was filed on February 17, 2026, in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. The case involves 'Other Immigration Actions' and names Joseph B. Edlow and USCIS as defendants.

Routine Enforcement Immigration
Favicon for www.cand.uscourts.gov

Langford v. Commissioner of Social Security - Social Security Case

A new civil case, Langford v. Commissioner of Social Security, was filed on February 17, 2026, in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. The case involves a complaint filed by Shundell S. Langford against the Commissioner of Social Security regarding disability benefits.

Routine Enforcement Pensions & Retirement
Favicon for www.ca4.uscourts.gov

Fourth Circuit Denies Petition for Writ of Mandamus

The Fourth Circuit denied a petition for a writ of mandamus filed by Roberto Antoine Darden. The petition alleged undue delay by the district court in acting on a motion to alter or amend a previous order. The appellate court found the district court had recently ruled on the motion, rendering the petition moot.

Routine Enforcement Judicial Administration
Favicon for www.ca4.uscourts.gov

Brandon Case v. Officer Beasley - Opinion Vacated and Remanded

The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals vacated and remanded the district court's decision in Brandon Case v. Officer Beasley. The court found that genuine disputes of material fact remain regarding the correctional officers' liability and the applicability of qualified immunity in a case alleging Eighth Amendment violations due to deliberate indifference to prisoner violence.

Priority review Enforcement Civil Rights
Favicon for www.ca4.uscourts.gov

City of Southfield v. Advance Auto Parts, Inc. - Securities Fraud Appeal

The Fourth Circuit affirmed a district court's dismissal of a securities fraud case against Advance Auto Parts, Inc. The court found that the plaintiffs failed to adequately allege scienter, or wrongful intent, in their claims that the company and its former officers manipulated accounting to mislead investors. The decision upholds the lower court's ruling.

Routine Enforcement Securities
24d ago D. Delaware Opinions
Favicon for www.ded.uscourts.gov

Richardson et al. v. Jawahar et al - Securities Fraud Case Ruling

The U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware denied a motion to stay a securities fraud case filed by Kathryn A. Richardson, Trustee, against Siddharth Jawahar. The court found that the defendant's arguments for a stay, based on potential Fifth Amendment self-incrimination during ongoing criminal proceedings, were not sufficiently supported.

Priority review Enforcement Securities
24d ago D. Delaware Opinions
Favicon for www.ded.uscourts.gov

Bloomsybox.com LLC v. Userway, Inc. - Motion to Dismiss Ruling

The U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware issued a report and recommendation on Userway, Inc.'s motion to dismiss a class action lawsuit filed by Bloomsybox.com LLC. The court recommended granting in part the motion to dismiss claims related to breach of contract, consumer fraud, warranty violations, and negligent misrepresentation.

Priority review Enforcement Consumer Protection
Favicon for www.cand.uscourts.gov

Goodman v. PayPal Holdings, Inc. et al - Securities Class Action

A new securities class action lawsuit has been filed against PayPal Holdings, Inc. and several executives. The case, filed in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California, alleges violations under the Class Action Private Securities Litigation Reform Act. The filing includes a complaint and a proposed summons.

Priority review Enforcement Securities
Favicon for www.cand.uscourts.gov

Tripathi v. Enphase Energy, Inc. et al - Securities Class Action

A securities class action lawsuit, Tripathi v. Enphase Energy, Inc. et al, was filed on February 17, 2026, in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. The case alleges violations under the Class Action Private Securities Litigation Reform Act. The filing fee was $405.

Priority review Enforcement Securities
Favicon for www.cand.uscourts.gov

V.R. v. Uber Technologies, Inc. - Personal Injury Product Liability

A new civil case, V.R. v. Uber Technologies, Inc. et al, was filed on February 17, 2026, in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. The case involves personal injury and product liability claims. The filing includes a complaint, proposed summons, and a certificate of interested entities.

Routine Enforcement Judicial Administration

Showing 1301–1310 of 1,394 changes

1 129 130 131 132 133 140

Get alerts for ""

We'll email you when new changes match this search.

Free. Unsubscribe anytime.