Changeflow GovPing Legal & Judicial John Eastman Disbarred, 10 of 11 Charges Upheld
Priority review Enforcement Amended Final

John Eastman Disbarred, 10 of 11 Charges Upheld

Favicon for www.calbar.ca.gov State Bar of California
Filed
Detected
Email

Summary

The California Supreme Court disbarred attorney John Charles Eastman on April 15, 2026, upholding 10 of 11 charges for egregious and deceitful conduct. The State Bar Court Review Department previously affirmed in July 2025 the hearing department's finding that Eastman advanced false claims about the 2020 presidential election to mislead courts, public officials, and the American public.

Published by State Bar of CA on calbar.ca.gov . Detected, standardized, and enriched by GovPing. Review our methodology and editorial standards .

What changed

The California Supreme Court has issued a final disbarment order against attorney John Charles Eastman, affirming professional misconduct findings on 10 of 11 charges. The State Bar Court had recommended disbarment after finding Eastman culpable of egregious and deceitful conduct related to false claims about the 2020 presidential election.

Legal professionals in California should note that this disciplinary action underscores the requirement for attorneys to act with honesty and uphold the rule of law regardless of client representation or context. The California Supreme Court's order confirms that advancing false claims to mislead courts, public officials, and the public is incompatible with the integrity standards required of California attorneys.

What to do next

  1. Ensure compliance with professional conduct standards
  2. Uphold honesty and integrity in legal proceedings

Archived snapshot

Apr 16, 2026

GovPing captured this document from the original source. If the source has since changed or been removed, this is the text as it existed at that time.


Attorney Discipline

Wed, Apr 15, 2026, All day

The California Supreme Court disbarred attorney John Charles Eastman today. This after the State Bar Court Review Department in July 2025 affirmed the findings of the State Bar Court Hearing Department’s March 2024 recommendation, which found Eastman culpable of 10 out of 11 charges for egregious and deceitful conduct and recommended his disbarment.

“Today’s California Supreme Court order disbarring John Charles Eastman from the practice of law in California affirms the fundamental principle that attorneys must act with honesty and uphold the rule of law, regardless of the client they represent or the context in which that representation occurs,” said State Bar Chief Trial Counsel George Cardona. “After extensive proceedings before the State Bar Court’s Hearing and Review Departments, both of which found Mr. Eastman culpable of serious ethical violations, the Court has imposed the discipline warranted by the clear and convincing evidence that he advanced false claims about the 2020 presidential election to mislead courts, public officials, and the American public. The Court’s order underscores that Mr. Eastman’s misconduct was incompatible with the standards of integrity required of every California attorney.”

You can search for State Bar Court records and documents related to attorney discipline matters using the court’s Case Search feature. Input either the case number (you must add SBC to recent case numbers) or attorney’s name (last, first and middle).

Attorney discipline matters are investigated and prosecuted by the State Bar’s Office of Chief Trial Counsel (OCTC), acting on behalf of the public. A Notice of Disciplinary Charges contains only allegations of professional misconduct. The attorney is presumed innocent of the allegations unless the State Bar Court finds the attorney culpable by clear and convincing evidence.

The State Bar Court oversees disciplinary proceedings and adjudicates charges filed by OCTC. The State Bar Court rules on whether an attorney has committed professional misconduct and may recommend that an attorney be suspended or disbarred. The State Bar Court’s recommendation is transmitted to the California Supreme Court, which determines whether to impose the recommended discipline. See rule 9.18, California Rules of Court.

Follow the State Bar online
LinkedIn, X, Facebook, Instagram, and YouTube

The State Bar of California’s mission is to protect the public and includes the primary functions of licensing, regulation and discipline of attorneys; the advancement of the ethical and competent practice of law; and support of efforts for greater access to, and inclusion in, the legal system.

Named provisions

Rule 9.18, California Rules of Court

Get daily alerts for State Bar of California

Daily digest delivered to your inbox.

Free. Unsubscribe anytime.

About this page

What is GovPing?

Every important government, regulator, and court update from around the world. One place. Real-time. Free. Our mission

What's from the agency?

Source document text, dates, docket IDs, and authority are extracted directly from State Bar of CA.

What's AI-generated?

The summary, classification, recommended actions, deadlines, and penalty information are AI-generated from the original text and may contain errors. Always verify against the source document.

Last updated

Classification

Agency
State Bar of CA
Filed
April 15th, 2026
Instrument
Enforcement
Legal weight
Binding
Stage
Final
Change scope
Substantive
Document ID
S292011
Docket
S292011

Who this affects

Applies to
Legal professionals
Industry sector
5411 Legal Services
Activity scope
Professional licensing Attorney discipline Professional misconduct
Geographic scope
California US-CA

Taxonomy

Primary area
Judicial Administration
Operational domain
Legal
Topics
Criminal Justice Civil Rights

Get alerts for this source

We'll email you when State Bar of California publishes new changes.

Free. Unsubscribe anytime.

You're subscribed!