Proxy Advisors Declared Investment Advice Fiduciaries Under ERISA
Summary
The U.S. Department of Labor's Employee Benefits Security Administration issued a Technical Release declaring that proxy advisory firms commonly engage in conduct that meets the test for investment advice fiduciaries under ERISA's five-part test. The guidance specifically addresses Institutional Shareholder Services and Glass, Lewis & Co., two foreign companies controlling more than 90 percent of the proxy advisory market. The Technical Release also extends beyond proxy advisors to examine when large asset managers, sovereign wealth funds, and other market participants may qualify as investment advice fiduciaries under ERISA.
“The U.S. Department of Labor's Employee Benefits Security Administration has issued first-of-its-kind guidance stating that proxy advisory firms commonly engage in business practices that meet the test for being investment advice fiduciaries.”
Proxy advisory firms and large asset managers providing vote recommendations to ERISA-covered plans should conduct a gap analysis against EBSA's five-part fiduciary test. The guidance's focus on ESG and DEI recommendations suggests that politically motivated voting advice may be the primary trigger for fiduciary status determinations under this framework.
About this source
GovPing monitors US EBSA News Releases for new labor & employment regulatory changes. Every update since tracking began is archived, classified, and available as free RSS or email alerts — 3 changes logged to date.
What changed
The Department of Labor's Technical Release establishes for the first time that proxy advisory firms regularly satisfy the criteria for investment advice fiduciaries under ERISA. The guidance applies the department's long-standing five-part test to conclude that proxy advisors who recommend votes on board members, management proposals, and shareholder proposals for a fee may trigger fiduciary duties. The guidance follows President Trump's Executive Order targeting ISS and Glass Lewis and signals that EBSA will examine whether other actors including large asset managers and sovereign wealth funds also meet the functional fiduciary definition.
Affected parties including proxy advisory firms, large asset managers, and ERISA plan fiduciaries should assess whether their current practices satisfy the five-part fiduciary test under this new interpretive framework. Proxy advisors that have engaged in ESG investing and DEI advocacy may face heightened scrutiny regarding the economic versus political motivations of their recommendations. Plan sponsors and fiduciaries should review their relationships with proxy advisory service providers to determine whether any new fiduciary obligations arise under this guidance.
Archived snapshot
Apr 23, 2026GovPing captured this document from the original source. If the source has since changed or been removed, this is the text as it existed at that time.
News Release
US Department of Labor issues guidance declaring proxy advisors may be investment advice fiduciaries
Guidance says proxy advisors are generally subject to ERISA’s strict fiduciary duties WASHINGTON – The U.S. Department of Labor’s Employee Benefits Security Administration has issued first-of-its-kind guidance stating that proxy advisory firms commonly engage in business practices that meet the test for being investment advice fiduciaries.
In a recently published Technical Release, the department spells out that proxy advisors regularly engage in conduct that makes them investment advice fiduciaries under the department’s long-standing five-part test. The Technical Release also makes clear that proxy advisors regularly fit the definition of functional fiduciaries under the Employee Retiree Income Security Act of 1974.
The guidance follows President Trump’s Executive Order from last year, Protecting American Investors From Foreign-Owned and Politically Motivated Proxy Advisors. The Executive Order singled out Institutional Shareholder Services and Glass, Lewis & Co. – two foreign companies that control more than 90% of the proxy advisory market. For years, ISS and Glass Lewis have recommended votes for board members, management proposals, and shareholder proposals that have political rather than economic motivations. Such recommendations could cause ERISA’s fiduciary duties to apply.
While focused on proxy advisors, the parameters of President Trump’s Executive Order are much broader. The President asked the department to determine if “any individual who has a relationship of trust and confidence with their client… who provides advice for a fee or other compensation, direct or indirect, with respect to the exercise of the rights appurtenant to shares held by ERISA plans, is an investment advice fiduciary under ERISA.”
The Executive Order makes clear that EBSA should not just examine whether proxy advisors’ actions meet the test to make them investment advice fiduciaries but also asked the department to look at other actors who manage, or advise those that manage, the rights connected to shares of stock, such as the right to vote for board members, held by ERISA-covered plans. Proxy advisors have played a central role in politicizing the capital markets by pursuing ESG investing and DEI positions, but they aren’t alone. At the President’s directive, EBSA’s Technical Release looks beyond the proxy advisors to consider when the actions of others, such as large asset managers, sovereign wealth funds, and the overseers of the proxy plumbing, render them investment advice fiduciaries.
Read the full Technical Release on proxy advisors.
Agency Employee Benefits Security Administration Date April 15, 2026 Release Number 26-609-NAT Media Contact: Christine Feroli Phone Number 202-693-4664 Email feroli.christine.e@dol.gov Media Contact: Grant Vaught Phone Number 202-693-4672 Email vaught.grant.e@dol.gov Share This
-
-
-
-
More News Releases Previous US Department of Labor amplifies maritime protections for Puerto Rico, US Virgin Islands following increased workplace safety concerns Next Up California construction contractor ordered to pay back wages, damages to 137 workers denied overtime, minimum wages
Named provisions
Mentioned entities
Related changes
Get daily alerts for US EBSA News Releases
Daily digest delivered to your inbox.
Free. Unsubscribe anytime.
About this page
Every important government, regulator, and court update from around the world. One place. Real-time. Free. Our mission
Source document text, dates, docket IDs, and authority are extracted directly from DOL.
The summary, classification, recommended actions, deadlines, and penalty information are AI-generated from the original text and may contain errors. Always verify against the source document.
Classification
Who this affects
Taxonomy
Browse Categories
Get alerts for this source
We'll email you when US EBSA News Releases publishes new changes.
Subscribed!
Optional. Filters your digest to exactly the updates that matter to you.