Changeflow GovPing US Courts

Recent changes

Favicon for courts.delaware.gov

KBranch v. BS13 Menu Buyer - Summary Judgment Opinion

The Delaware Superior Court issued a memorandum opinion in KBranch, Inc. v. BS13 Menu Buyer, Inc. The court denied the plaintiffs' motion for summary judgment and granted in part and denied in part the defendant's motion for summary judgment regarding claims related to an escrow dispute following a company sale.

Priority review Enforcement Corporate Governance
Favicon for courts.delaware.gov

State v. Jackson - Postconviction Relief Denied

The Delaware Superior Court denied Raymond Jackson's motion for postconviction relief. Jackson sought relief based on alleged evidence suppression and ineffective assistance of counsel, but the court found no grounds to overturn his guilty plea.

Routine Enforcement Criminal Justice
2mo ago D. Delaware Opinions
Favicon for www.ded.uscourts.gov

Bloomsybox.com LLC v. Userway, Inc. - Motion to Dismiss Ruling

The U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware issued a report and recommendation on Userway, Inc.'s motion to dismiss a class action lawsuit filed by Bloomsybox.com LLC. The court recommended granting in part the motion to dismiss claims related to breach of contract, consumer fraud, warranty violations, and negligent misrepresentation.

Priority review Enforcement Consumer Protection
2mo ago D. Delaware Opinions
Favicon for www.ded.uscourts.gov

Richardson et al. v. Jawahar et al - Securities Fraud Case Ruling

The U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware denied a motion to stay a securities fraud case filed by Kathryn A. Richardson, Trustee, against Siddharth Jawahar. The court found that the defendant's arguments for a stay, based on potential Fifth Amendment self-incrimination during ongoing criminal proceedings, were not sufficiently supported.

Priority review Enforcement Securities
Favicon for www.cand.uscourts.gov

Goodman v. PayPal Holdings, Inc. et al - Securities Class Action

A new securities class action lawsuit has been filed against PayPal Holdings, Inc. and several executives. The case, filed in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California, alleges violations under the Class Action Private Securities Litigation Reform Act. The filing includes a complaint and a proposed summons.

Priority review Enforcement Securities
Favicon for www.cand.uscourts.gov

Tripathi v. Enphase Energy, Inc. et al - Securities Class Action

A securities class action lawsuit, Tripathi v. Enphase Energy, Inc. et al, was filed on February 17, 2026, in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. The case alleges violations under the Class Action Private Securities Litigation Reform Act. The filing fee was $405.

Priority review Enforcement Securities
Favicon for www.cand.uscourts.gov

V.R. v. Uber Technologies, Inc. - Personal Injury Product Liability

A new civil case, V.R. v. Uber Technologies, Inc. et al, was filed on February 17, 2026, in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. The case involves personal injury and product liability claims. The filing includes a complaint, proposed summons, and a certificate of interested entities.

Routine Enforcement Judicial Administration
Favicon for www.cand.uscourts.gov

Lawrence v. Lawrence et al - Airplane Personal Injury

The US District Court for the Northern District of California has filed a new civil case, Lawrence v. Lawrence et al. The case, docketed as 3:26-cv-01378, involves a complaint for personal injury damages under the Montreal Convention.

Routine Enforcement Judicial Administration
Favicon for www.cand.uscourts.gov

J.N. v. Uber Technologies - Personal Injury Product Liability

A new civil case, J.N. v. Uber Technologies, Inc. et al, was filed on February 17, 2026, in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. The case involves personal injury and product liability claims. The initial filings include the complaint and proposed summons.

Routine Enforcement Judicial Administration
Favicon for courts.delaware.gov

Delaware Court of Chancery Opinion on No Surprises Act

The Delaware Court of Chancery dismissed a case seeking to enforce arbitration awards under the No Surprises Act, ruling that the Act does not contain an implied private right of action. The court followed federal precedent in declining to create such a right, dismissing the plaintiffs' claims.

Priority review Enforcement Healthcare

Showing 7291–7300 of 7,496 changes

1 728 729 730 731 732 750

Get US Courts alerts

Daily digest of regulatory changes. AI-summarized, no noise.

Free. Unsubscribe anytime.

Get US Courts alerts

We'll email you when new US Courts regulatory changes are detected.

Optional. Personalizes your daily digest.

Free. Unsubscribe anytime.