Virginia Senate Bill 170 and House Bill 627 Restrict Noncompete Agreements

April 14, 2026

Virginia Enacts New Restrictions on the Use of Noncompetes

David Constine III, Andrew Henson, Patrick Houston Troutman Pepper Locke + Follow Contact LinkedIn Facebook X Send Embed

Employers will soon be obligated to provide employees with severance benefits if they want to have an enforceable noncompete in Virginia and they also will be prohibited from entering into noncompetes with health care professionals, except in connection with the sale of a business. These obligations and several other new restrictions are part of Senate Bill 170 and House Bill 627, landmark legislation recently passed by the General Assembly and slated to take effect on July 1, 2026.

The new noncompete legislation applies to all employees and categorically bans noncompetes for almost all health care professionals, in sharp contrast to Virginia’s existing noncompete statutes, which currently cover only low-wage employees, including hourly employees. Moreover, because of recent case law from the Court of Appeals of Virginia in Sentry Force Security, LLC v. Barrera, 2026 WL 200848 (Va. Ct. App. Jan. 27, 2026), the new legislation will also apply to covenants prohibiting the solicitation or hiring of fellow employees. As a result, Virginia employers need to be prepared for these changes, which apply to all agreements entered, amended, or renewed on or after July 1, 2026.

SB 170 and HB 627 currently await Governor Abigail Spanberger’s signature, which must occur by April 13, 2026, or the legislation will automatically become law.

Key Features of SB 170

SB 170 significantly expands the commonwealth’s restrictions on covenants not to compete:

• Severance Requirement: The bill prohibits enforcement of all covenants not to compete that are entered into, amended, or renewed on or after July 1, 2026, if the employer terminates the employee’s employment without cause and does not provide severance benefits or other monetary payment to the employee.
• Disclosure of Severance Requirement: Any severance benefits or other monetary payment that will support enforcement of a covenant not to compete must be disclosed to the employee at the time the covenant is executed.
• Exception for Termination for Cause: The prohibition does not apply when an employee is discharged for cause. However, SB 170 does not define “for cause” or “severance benefits,” and it does not establish a minimum severance or payment amount.
• No Sale-of-Business Exception: SB 170 does not expressly include an exception for covenants not to compete entered into in connection with the sale of a business.
• Penalties for Noncompliance: Violations of Virginia’s restrictions on the use of covenants not to compete can result in civil penalties of $10,000 for each violation, underscoring the importance of compliance. Key Features of HB 627 / SB 128

The General Assembly also passed HB 627 and SB 128 (identical bills) that prohibit the use of noncompetes with “health care professionals.” The legislation defines “health care professional” as “any person licensed, registered, or certified by the Board of Medicine, Nursing, Counseling, Optometry, Psychology, or Social Work.”

Although noncompetes with health care professionals will generally be prohibited, the legislation expressly allows employers of health care professionals to:

• Enter into noncompetes with health care professionals in connection with the sale of a business.
• Enter into customer nonsolicitation agreements that restrict a health care professional from soliciting customers or prospective customers with whom the health care professional had material contact during employment, for products or services that are the same as or substantially similar to those provided by the employer. HB 627 also expressly permits the use of nondisclosure agreements that restrict the misuse of trade secrets and proprietary or confidential information. This carve-out applies to all employees, not only health care professionals.

Existing Virginia Noncompete Restrictions

This legislation is the latest in a pattern of tightening restrictions on noncompete agreements. Since 2020, Virginia has prohibited noncompete agreements for low-wage employees, defined as employees and individual independent contractors whose average weekly earnings fall below the average weekly wage of the commonwealth. See Va. Code § 40.1-28.7:8. Currently, this threshold is $78,364.25 per year. In 2025, Virginia broadened this restriction by expanding the definition of low-wage employees to include employees who, regardless of their average weekly earnings, are entitled to overtime compensation under the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) for any hours worked over 40 in a workweek. On January 27, 2026, the Court of Appeals of Virginia in Sentry Force Sec., No. 1405-24-4, held that Virginia’s prohibition on covenants not to compete for low-wage employees (i) does not prevent employers from enforcing customer nonsolicitation provisions against low-wage employees; but (ii) does prevent employers from enforcing employee non-solicitation provisions against low-wage employees.

Impact of New Legislation

With the implementation of SB 170 and HB 627, Virginia’s restrictions on the use of covenants not to compete will extend beyond low-wage employees to cover all employees and all health care professionals. Employers will be unable to enforce noncompete agreements against employees who are terminated without cause and who do not receive severance benefits or other qualifying monetary payments, where the covenant was entered into, amended, or renewed on or after July 1, 2026. Employers will also be unable to enforce noncompete agreements against health care professionals unless the noncompete agreement is entered into in connection with the sale of a business or the exceptions above apply.

As July 1 approaches, employers should review their existing restrictive covenant agreements to consider whether any action is needed.

Send Print Report

Related Posts

• Massachusetts: Finally, Some Meat on the Bones of Its Noncompete Law?
• Delaware Court of Chancery Invalidates Noncompete in Incentive Equity Agreements Due to Overbreadth
• FTC Takes Aim at Noncompete Agreements in the Health Care Sector

Latest Posts

• FinCEN’s AML Reset: Proposed Rule Rewrites the Playbook for AML/CFT Programs
• Auto Finance Year in Review, Part 2: Security Clearances, Supervisory Lines, and Connected Cars — Moving the Metal: The Auto Finance Podcast Audio See more »

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.
Attorney Advertising.

©
Troutman Pepper Locke

Written by:

Troutman Pepper Locke Contact + Follow David Constine III + Follow Andrew Henson + Follow Patrick Houston + Follow more less

PUBLISH YOUR CONTENT ON JD SUPRA

• ✔ Increased readership
• ✔ Actionable analytics
• ✔ Ongoing writing guidance Join more than 70,000 authors publishing their insights on JD Supra

Start Publishing »

Published In:

Disclosure Requirements + Follow Employee Benefits + Follow Employer Responsibilities + Follow Health Care Providers + Follow Healthcare + Follow New Legislation + Follow Non-Compete Agreements + Follow Penalties + Follow Restrictive Covenants + Follow Severance Agreements + Follow State Labor Laws + Follow State Legislatures + Follow Virginia + Follow General Business + Follow Health + Follow Labor & Employment + Follow more less

Troutman Pepper Locke on:

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra: Sign Up Log in ** By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.* - hide - hide