Health Care Non-Compete Legislation Q1 2026 Update
Summary
Several states enacted new restrictions on non-compete agreements for healthcare workers in Q1 2026. Washington passed H.B. 1155 banning all non-compete covenants effective June 30, 2027. Virginia enacted a law prohibiting non-compete enforcement when employees are terminated without cause unless severance is provided, and passed legislation broadly prohibiting non-competes with health care professionals pending the governor's signature. Utah prohibited non-compete agreements with health care workers effective May 6, 2026. Montana expanded its physician non-compete ban effective January 1, 2026. California enacted legislation targeting private equity and hedge fund influence in healthcare practices.
What changed
Multiple states enacted significant restrictions on non-compete agreements for healthcare workers during Q1 2026. Washington passed a comprehensive ban on non-competition covenants for all workers, effective June 30, 2027, requiring employers to notify current employees by October 1, 2027. Virginia enacted two laws: one requiring severance for discharged employees subject to non-competes, and another broadly prohibiting non-competes for health care professionals pending the governor's final approval. Utah and Montana expanded existing prohibitions to cover additional categories of healthcare workers.
Healthcare employers operating in multiple states must review and update their employment agreements to ensure compliance with varying state requirements. Employers in Washington must provide written notice that existing non-compete agreements are void by October 2027. Virginia employers must prepare for potential severance obligations or complete prohibition of healthcare worker non-competes. Utah and Montana employers should audit existing agreements with newly covered healthcare providers. Legal counsel should monitor pending legislation in Iowa and Maine, as well as Virginia's anticipated final action on healthcare professional non-compete prohibition.
Archived snapshot
Apr 17, 2026GovPing captured this document from the original source. If the source has since changed or been removed, this is the text as it existed at that time.
April 17, 2026
Health Care Non-Compete Legislation Q1 2026 Update
Jesse Coleman, Reeves Gillis, Ben Rosichan Seyfarth Shaw LLP + Follow Contact LinkedIn Facebook X ;) Embed In the first quarter of 2026, state legislatures have continued to limit the use of restrictive covenants with employees, with the most industry-focused limitations once again being in health care.
This post tracks recent changes in non-compete law for Q1 2026 throughout the country, provides key takeaways, and maps out the current landscape.
KEY TAKEAWAYS
- Washington effectively banned all non-compete agreements, including in the health care industry.
- Virginia enacted a new law prohibiting the enforcement of non-compete agreements when an employee is terminated without cause unless the employer provides severance or other monetary payment. The legislature also passed legislation which will effectively ban non-compete agreements with health care professions, and is now weighing recommendations from the governor.
- Utah enacted legislation prohibiting non-compete agreements with health care workers, and
- Montana expanded its prohibition on non-compete agreements with healthcare providers to include any physicians. CURRENT LANDSCAPE
The landscape regarding permissibility of medical non-compete agreements for health care providers has shifted considerably since June 2025:
STATE LEGISLATIVE DEVELOPMENTS
Washington
The Washington legislature passed H.B. 1155 on March 23, 2026. [1] The new law, which is effective on June 30, 2027, bans all noncompetition covenants with Washington-based workers and businesses. Moreover, employers must make a “reasonable effort” to provide their current and former employees with written notice that current noncompete agreements are now void and unenforceable by October 1, 2027. The new law also expands the definition of “noncompetition covenants” to include agreements that require an individual to return, repay, or forfeit any right, benefit, or compensation with limited exceptions for educational expenses. Narrower categories of non-solicitation agreements are still permissible under the new law, provided the employee established or substantially developed a relationship during their employment and the agreement expires 18 months after separation.
VirginiaVirginia enacted a new law which bars enforcement of non-compete agreements against employees (health care or otherwise) discharged without cause unless the employer provides severance benefits or monetary payment. The employer must disclose the severance benefits or monetary payment upon execution of the non-compete. [2] This new law also expands rights to sue for violations to all employees. This law will not effect agreements entered into, amended, or renewed before the law’s effective date of July 1, 2026.
The Virginia legislature passed a law which would broadly prohibit any employer from entering into, enforcing, or threatening to enforce a non-compete agreement with a health care professional. This law defines a “health care professional” as any person licensed, registered, or certified by the Borad of Medicine, Nursing, Counseling, Optometry, Psychology, or Social Work. On April 11, 2026, Governor Spanberger proposed an amendment to a provision in the bill regarding non-solicitation agreements which would permit providers to inform patients of the provider’s new contact information and patients’ right to choose a provider. The legislature will consider this recommendation when it reconvenes on April 22nd. If passed, the bills will be sent to the governor for signature who has an additional 30 days to sign the bills.
UtahEffective May 6, 2026, employers may no longer enter into non-compete agreements with health care workers. Additionally, the new legislation voids non-solicitation agreements that prevent health care workers from informing patients of their current or future workplace. The legislation defines a “health care worker” as an individual licensed and practicing in a wide range of clinical professions, including doctors, nurses, psychologists, and mental health counselors.
MontanaMontana continued to expand its law prohibiting non-compete agreements with certain health care providers. Effective January 1, 2026, Montana now prohibits non-compete agreements with any physician. Previously, non-competes were previously prohibited for psychologists, social workers, and enumerated categories of mental health counselors.
CaliforniaNew legislation aimed at curbing the influence of private equity groups and hedge funds in health care went into effect on January 1, 2026. The new legislation broadly bans contractual clauses prohibiting a provider from competing with a medical or dental practice if the provider is terminated or resigns from all contracts involving the management of a physician or dental practice and private equity groups or hedge funds. The practical effect of the new law will likely be negligible, as California has effectively banned most non-compete agreements for decades.
New Threshold Shifts
Compensation thresholds continue to shift, with Colorado, the District of Columbia, Maine, Oregon, Rhode Island, and Virginia updating eligibility levels for employees who can be bound by restrictive covenants.
Pending Legislation
Some states whose legislatures are still in session have pending legislation which, if passed, will affect noncompete agreements with healthcare providers in Iowa and Maine. Most notably though, the Virginia legislature will consider the governor’s recommendation to the legislature’s effective ban on non-compete agreements with health care professions when it reconvenes on April 22nd. Stay tuned for another update this summer as the landscape continues to shift.
[1] See our earlier full coverage on this new law.
[2] See or earlier full coverage of recent legislation in Virginia here.
;) ;) Report
Related Posts
- Virginia Enacts New Restrictions on Non-Compete Agreements
- 50 State Desktop Reference: What Businesses Need To Know About Non-Competes And Trade Secrets Law
- Florida Becomes Most Employer-Friendly State for Non-Competes
Latest Posts
- California’s DBE Recertification Deadline Is Here: What Contractors Need to Do By April 16
- Health Care Non-Compete Legislation Q1 2026 Update See more »
DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.
Attorney Advertising.
©
Seyfarth Shaw LLP
Written by:
Seyfarth Shaw LLP Contact + Follow Jesse Coleman + Follow Reeves Gillis + Follow Ben Rosichan + Follow more less
PUBLISH YOUR CONTENT ON JD SUPRA
- ✔ Increased readership
- ✔ Actionable analytics
- ✔ Ongoing writing guidance Join more than 70,000 authors publishing their insights on JD Supra
Published In:
Contract Terms + Follow Employer Responsibilities + Follow Employment Contract + Follow Health Care Providers + Follow Healthcare + Follow Healthcare Workers + Follow New Legislation + Follow Non-Compete Agreements + Follow Restrictive Covenants + Follow State Labor Laws + Follow State Legislatures + Follow Virginia + Follow Washington + Follow General Business + Follow Health + Follow Labor & Employment + Follow more less
Seyfarth Shaw LLP on:
"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"
Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra: Sign Up Log in ** By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.* - hide - hide
Related changes
Get daily alerts for JD Supra Healthcare
Daily digest delivered to your inbox.
Free. Unsubscribe anytime.
Source
About this page
Every important government, regulator, and court update from around the world. One place. Real-time. Free. Our mission
Source document text, dates, docket IDs, and authority are extracted directly from Seyfarth Shaw.
The summary, classification, recommended actions, deadlines, and penalty information are AI-generated from the original text and may contain errors. Always verify against the source document.
Classification
Who this affects
Taxonomy
Browse Categories
Get alerts for this source
We'll email you when JD Supra Healthcare publishes new changes.
Subscribed!
Optional. Filters your digest to exactly the updates that matter to you.