Changeflow GovPing Healthcare Ohio SB 386 Proposes Replacing MCOs with ASO
Routine Notice Added Consultation

Ohio SB 386 Proposes Replacing MCOs with ASO

Favicon for www.jdsupra.com JD Supra Healthcare
Published
Detected
Email

Summary

Ohio Senators Louis Blessing and Beth Liston introduced Senate Bill 386, the 'Medicaid Savings Act,' proposing to replace the state's seven Medicaid Managed Care Organizations with Administrative Services Organization vendors paid flat fees instead of capitated rates. The bill, currently in Senate Medicaid Committee sponsor testimony, cites Connecticut's ASO transition and potential federal Medicaid cuts under HR1 as rationale.

Published by Shumaker, Loop & Kendrick on jdsupra.com . Detected, standardized, and enriched by GovPing. Review our methodology and editorial standards .

What changed

Ohio Senate Bill 386 proposes replacing the current Medicaid Managed Care Organization model with an Administrative Services Organization framework. Under the current risk-bearing model, Ohio pays seven MCOs capitated per-member-per-month rates; the ASO model would pay vendors a flat administrative fee without financial risk.

Healthcare providers and insurers should monitor this legislation as it progresses through committee. If enacted, providers would transition from individual MCO contracts to a centralized state-directed system, while sponsors suggest savings could increase provider reimbursement rates.

Archived snapshot

Apr 17, 2026

GovPing captured this document from the original source. If the source has since changed or been removed, this is the text as it existed at that time.

April 17, 2026

Client Alert: Ohio Lawmakers Propose Ending Medicaid Managed Care in Favor of Administrative Services Organization Model

Daphne Kackloudis Shumaker, Loop & Kendrick, LLP + Follow Contact LinkedIn Facebook X ;) Embed

A bipartisan duo of Ohio legislators introduced Senate Bill 386, titled the "Medicaid Savings Act." The bill, introduced by Senators Louis Blessing (R-Cincinnati) and Beth Liston (D-Dublin), proposes a fundamental shift in how Ohio administers its Medicaid program, moving away from the current Managed Care Organization (MCO) model to an Administrative Services Organization (ASO) framework. Representative Karen Brownlee (D-Cincinnati) introduced a companion bill, HB780, in the House.

The Proposed Shift: MCO vs. ASO

Currently, Ohio utilizes seven different MCOs to manage Medicaid benefits. Under this “risk-bearing” model, the state pays the MCOs a capitated (per-member per-month) rate to manage the care of Medicaid beneficiaries and assume financial risk.

SB 386 seeks to replace these MCOs with ASO vendors that would be paid a flat fee to administer the program without bearing risk. The bill sponsors argue that this change would reduce overhead and save money; they point to the state's recent Single Pharmacy Benefit Manager (PBM) reform, which reportedly saved hundreds of millions of dollars.

**** Key Objectives of SB 386

According to the bill sponsors, moving to the ASO model will have significant benefits to the State of Ohio and Ohio Medicaid beneficiaries.

  • Cost Reduction: By removing the “middleman,” profit margins and overhead associated with multiple insurance plans will go down. The bill sponsors cite Connecticut's successful transition to an ASO model as a precedent.
  • Reduced Administrative Burden: Currently, providers must contract and navigate relationships with seven different systems. A unified ASO model would standardize these processes.
  • Enhanced Transparency: Lawmakers expressed frustration with the lack of insight into how MCOs currently spend state funds. The ASO model is intended to provide a clearer view of where tax dollars are allocated.
  • Response to Federal Pressures: The proposal is framed as a necessary reaction to federal legislation (HR1 or the One Big Beautiful Bill Act), which is expected to result in significant cuts to the Medicaid program, necessitating new ways to find state budget savings. Impact on Health Care Providers and Stakeholders

I f passed, SB 386 would represent the most significant overhaul of Ohio's Medicaid infrastructure in over a decade. While the bill promises “easier” processes for health care providers, it would also mean:

  1. Contractual Transitions: Providers would eventually move away from individual MCO contracts to a centralized state-directed administrative system.
  2. Increased Reimbursement Potential: Sponsors suggest that savings found in overhead could be redirected toward increasing provider reimbursement rates.
  3. Simplified Compliance: A single set of rules governing the relationship between providers and the Medicaid program would replace the current system. Next Steps

SB 386 is currently undergoing sponsor testimony in the Senate Medicaid Committee. Medicaid providers should monitor this legislation closely, as it challenges the long-standing role of private insurance companies in Ohio’s public health landscape.

;) ;) Report

Related Posts

Latest Posts

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.
Attorney Advertising.

©
Shumaker, Loop & Kendrick, LLP

Written by:

Shumaker, Loop & Kendrick, LLP Contact + Follow Daphne Kackloudis + Follow more less

PUBLISH YOUR CONTENT ON JD SUPRA

  • ✔ Increased readership
  • ✔ Actionable analytics
  • ✔ Ongoing writing guidance Join more than 70,000 authors publishing their insights on JD Supra

Start Publishing »

Published In:

Health Care Providers + Follow Health Insurance + Follow Healthcare + Follow Managed Care Contracts + Follow Medicaid + Follow Proposed Legislation + Follow Public Health + Follow Regulatory Reform + Follow State and Local Government + Follow State Legislatures + Follow Administrative Agency + Follow Health + Follow Insurance + Follow more less

Shumaker, Loop & Kendrick, LLP on:

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra: Sign Up Log in ** By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.* - hide - hide

Get daily alerts for JD Supra Healthcare

Daily digest delivered to your inbox.

Free. Unsubscribe anytime.

About this page

What is GovPing?

Every important government, regulator, and court update from around the world. One place. Real-time. Free. Our mission

What's from the agency?

Source document text, dates, docket IDs, and authority are extracted directly from Shumaker, Loop & Kendrick.

What's AI-generated?

The summary, classification, recommended actions, deadlines, and penalty information are AI-generated from the original text and may contain errors. Always verify against the source document.

Last updated

Classification

Agency
Shumaker, Loop & Kendrick
Published
April 17th, 2026
Instrument
Notice
Legal weight
Non-binding
Stage
Consultation
Change scope
Minor

Who this affects

Applies to
Healthcare providers Insurers
Industry sector
6221 Hospitals & Health Systems
Activity scope
Medicaid managed care Administrative services organization
Geographic scope
US-OH US-OH

Taxonomy

Primary area
Healthcare
Operational domain
Compliance
Topics
Insurance Public Health

Get alerts for this source

We'll email you when JD Supra Healthcare publishes new changes.

Free. Unsubscribe anytime.

You're subscribed!