Changeflow GovPing Healthcare & Life Sciences TA-CPR vs Telephone CPR for Out-of-Hospital Car...
Routine Notice Added Final

TA-CPR vs Telephone CPR for Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest

Favicon for changeflow.com ClinicalTrials.gov Studies
Published
Detected
Email

Summary

A pragmatic cluster-randomized controlled trial registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT07546474) will compare Telemedicine-Assisted CPR (TA-CPR) against conventional Dispatcher-Assisted CPR (DA-CPR) in adult patients with suspected non-traumatic out-of-hospital cardiac arrest within a hospital-based EMS system in Bangkok, Thailand. The study uses month-based cluster randomization, assigning either TA-CPR (real-time video call allowing dispatchers to visually assess patient and rescuer) or standard voice-only DA-CPR to all eligible patients each month. Both protocols use standard CPR instructions, with the TA-CPR group receiving live visual feedback to potentially improve chest compression quality and outcomes.

“Telemedicine-assisted CPR (TA-CPR) allows dispatchers or emergency medical providers to see the patient and the rescuer through a live video call, potentially improving CPR performance by providing real-time visual feedback.”

NIH , verbatim from source
Published by NIH on changeflow.com . Detected, standardized, and enriched by GovPing. Review our methodology and editorial standards .

About this source

GovPing monitors ClinicalTrials.gov Studies for new healthcare & life sciences regulatory changes. Every update since tracking began is archived, classified, and available as free RSS or email alerts — 607 changes logged to date.

What changed

This ClinicalTrials.gov registration documents a new pragmatic cluster-randomized controlled trial comparing two dispatcher-guided CPR protocols for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. The experimental arm (TA-CPR) uses real-time video communication, enabling dispatchers to observe the patient and rescuer directly, while the control arm uses conventional voice-only instructions (DA-CPR). Cluster randomization is applied by month rather than by individual patient. The study aims to generate real-world evidence on whether visual feedback through telemedicine improves survival outcomes in EMS systems.

EMS systems considering or already implementing video-based dispatch protocols should monitor the outcomes of this Bangkok-based trial. The study design (pragmatic, cluster-randomized, within an operational EMS system) provides directly applicable evidence for jurisdictions evaluating TA-CPR adoption. Healthcare systems with existing telemedicine infrastructure may find the results particularly relevant for protocol development.

Archived snapshot

Apr 22, 2026

GovPing captured this document from the original source. If the source has since changed or been removed, this is the text as it existed at that time.

← ClinicalTrials.gov Studies

Telemedicine-Assisted vs Conventional Telephone Instruction in Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation

N/A NCT07546474 Kind: NA Apr 22, 2026

Abstract

Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) is a life-threatening emergency where early cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) by bystanders can significantly improve survival. Emergency dispatchers often guide bystanders to perform CPR over the phone, a method known as dispatcher-assisted CPR (DA-CPR). While this approach has increased bystander CPR rates worldwide, it relies on voice communication only, which may limit the dispatcher's ability to assess the situation and guide CPR effectively.

With advances in telecommunication technology, video-based communication has become more widely available. Telemedicine-assisted CPR (TA-CPR) allows dispatchers or emergency medical providers to see the patient and the rescuer through a live video call, potentially improving CPR performance by providing real-time visual feedback. However, evidence on whether this approach improves outcomes in real-world emergency medical service (EMS) systems is still limited.

This study aims to compare the effectiveness of TA-CPR with conventional DA-CPR in adult patients with suspected non-traumatic OHCA. The study is designed as a pragmatic cluster-randomized controlled trial conducted within a hospital-based EMS system in Bangkok, Thailand. Instead of randomizing individual patients, the CPR instruction protocol is assigned by month (cluster randomization). During each month, all eligible patients receive either the TA-CPR protocol or the DA-CPR protocol.

In both groups, CPR instructions are first pr...

Conditions: Out-of-hospital Cardiac Arrest (OHCA), Emergency Medical Services

Interventions: Telemedicine-Assisted CPR (TA-CPR), Dispatcher-Assisted CPR (DA-CPR)

View original document →

Get daily alerts for ClinicalTrials.gov Studies

Daily digest delivered to your inbox.

Free. Unsubscribe anytime.

About this page

What is GovPing?

Every important government, regulator, and court update from around the world. One place. Real-time. Free. Our mission

What's from the agency?

Source document text, dates, docket IDs, and authority are extracted directly from NIH.

What's AI-generated?

The summary, classification, recommended actions, deadlines, and penalty information are AI-generated from the original text and may contain errors. Always verify against the source document.

Last updated

Classification

Agency
NIH
Published
April 22nd, 2026
Instrument
Notice
Branch
Executive
Legal weight
Non-binding
Stage
Final
Change scope
Minor
Docket
NCT07546474

Who this affects

Applies to
Healthcare providers Public health authorities
Industry sector
6221 Hospitals & Health Systems
Activity scope
Clinical trial registration Emergency medical services CPR protocol evaluation
Geographic scope
TH TH

Taxonomy

Primary area
Healthcare
Operational domain
Clinical Operations
Topics
Public Health Medical Devices

Get alerts for this source

We'll email you when ClinicalTrials.gov Studies publishes new changes.

Free. Unsubscribe anytime.

You're subscribed!