Changeflow GovPing Healthcare & Life Sciences Randomized Trial Comparing 5 vs 8 cmH₂O PEEP in...
Routine Notice Added Final

Randomized Trial Comparing 5 vs 8 cmH₂O PEEP in Prone Lumbar Surgery

Favicon for changeflow.com ClinicalTrials.gov Studies
Detected
Email

Summary

Clinical trial NCT07545733 registered on ClinicalTrials.gov is a randomized controlled trial comparing the effects of 5 cmH₂O versus 8 cmH₂O positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) levels on respiratory mechanics in patients undergoing lumbar spine surgery in the prone position under total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA). The study will evaluate driving pressure and mechanical power as key determinants of ventilator-induced lung stress. Conditions include lumbar disc herniation, spinal surgery, prone position, and general anesthesia. No regulatory obligations or compliance requirements are imposed by this clinical trial registration.

“This randomized controlled clinical trial aims to compare the effects of two different positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) levels (5 cmH₂O and 8 cmH₂O) on respiratory mechanics in patients undergoing lumbar spine surgery in the prone position under total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA).”

NIH , verbatim from source
Published by NIH on changeflow.com . Detected, standardized, and enriched by GovPing. Review our methodology and editorial standards .

About this source

GovPing monitors ClinicalTrials.gov Studies for new healthcare & life sciences regulatory changes. Every update since tracking began is archived, classified, and available as free RSS or email alerts — 734 changes logged to date.

What changed

Clinical trial NCT07545733 has been registered on ClinicalTrials.gov as a randomized controlled trial evaluating two PEEP levels (5 and 8 cmH₂O) during prone lumbar surgery under total intravenous anesthesia. The study aims to assess the impact of different PEEP levels on respiratory parameters, driving pressure, and mechanical power as determinants of ventilator-induced lung stress. This is an informational research registration and does not impose any compliance obligations on healthcare providers, manufacturers, or other regulated entities.

For healthcare institutions and clinical researchers, this trial registration represents a data point in the medical literature regarding optimal ventilatory strategies for patients in prone position. The findings, once published, may inform clinical practice guidelines for perioperative respiratory management in spinal surgery. No immediate action is required by regulatory or compliance teams.

Archived snapshot

Apr 23, 2026

GovPing captured this document from the original source. If the source has since changed or been removed, this is the text as it existed at that time.

← ClinicalTrials.gov Studies

Comparison of 5 vs 8 cmH₂O PEEP on Respiratory Mechanics in Prone Lumbar Surgery

N/A NCT07545733 Kind: NA Apr 22, 2026

Abstract

This randomized controlled clinical trial aims to compare the effects of two different positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) levels (5 cmH₂O and 8 cmH₂O) on respiratory mechanics in patients undergoing lumbar spine surgery in the prone position under total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA). Prone positioning may adversely affect lung compliance and gas exchange, making optimal ventilatory strategies essential. Driving pressure and mechanical power are considered key determinants of ventilator-induced lung stress. This study will evaluate the impact of different PEEP levels on respiratory parameters and intraoperative physiological changes.

Conditions: Lumbar Disc Herniation, Spinal Surgery, Prone Position, General Anesthesia

Interventions: Mechanical Ventilation (PEEP)

View original document →

Get daily alerts for ClinicalTrials.gov Studies

Daily digest delivered to your inbox.

Free. Unsubscribe anytime.

About this page

What is GovPing?

Every important government, regulator, and court update from around the world. One place. Real-time. Free. Our mission

What's from the agency?

Source document text, dates, docket IDs, and authority are extracted directly from NIH.

What's AI-generated?

The summary, classification, recommended actions, deadlines, and penalty information are AI-generated from the original text and may contain errors. Always verify against the source document.

Last updated

Classification

Agency
NIH
Instrument
Notice
Branch
Executive
Legal weight
Non-binding
Stage
Final
Change scope
Minor

Who this affects

Applies to
Healthcare providers
Industry sector
6211 Healthcare Providers
Activity scope
Clinical research Medical device clinical trials
Geographic scope
United States US

Taxonomy

Primary area
Healthcare
Operational domain
Healthcare
Topics
Public Health Healthcare

Get alerts for this source

We'll email you when ClinicalTrials.gov Studies publishes new changes.

Free. Unsubscribe anytime.

You're subscribed!