Changeflow GovPing Healthcare & Life Sciences Pilot Study Evaluates Occupational Health Data ...
Routine Guidance Added Final

Pilot Study Evaluates Occupational Health Data for Radiation Effects

Favicon for www.gov.uk UK UKHSA
Published
Detected
Email

Summary

UKHSA has launched a pilot study examining whether occupational health records from Springfields Fuels Ltd contain usable data on lifestyle and health factors such as smoking, alcohol consumption, hypertension, diabetes, and asbestos exposure. The study will analyse approximately 7,000 archived electronic records spanning up to 36 years of follow-up data, matched to workers on the National Registry of Radiation Workers. Results will inform whether health and lifestyle data can improve estimates of radiation-related disease risks.

Why this matters

Radiation-exposed employers and occupational health departments at participating sites should be aware that UKHSA is actively evaluating the feasibility of linking lifestyle and health factors to radiation worker surveillance data. If the pilot succeeds, broader occupational health data requests may follow, potentially requiring employers to prepare electronic record systems for data extraction and sharing. Stakeholders in the nuclear sector and radiation protection community should monitor pilot outcomes as they may inform future risk estimation methodologies used by international standards bodies.

AI-drafted from the source document, validated against GovPing's analyst note standards . For the primary regulatory language, read the source document .
Published by UKHSA on gov.uk . Detected, standardized, and enriched by GovPing. Review our methodology and editorial standards .

What changed

UKHSA published final guidance announcing a pilot study to evaluate the feasibility of using occupational health records to improve radiation risk estimates. The study will extract health and lifestyle data from approximately 7,000 electronic records at Springfields Fuels Ltd and match them to the National Registry of Radiation Workers. The study aims to assess data quality, completeness, and whether lifestyle factors correlate with disease rates among radiation workers.

Affected parties include radiation workers at participating sites, employers holding occupational health records, and the broader nuclear industry. If the pilot demonstrates sufficient data quality and completeness, UKHSA may pursue wider collection of health and lifestyle factors and engage stakeholders on expanded data collection from both electronic and paper records. The study does not create immediate compliance obligations but signals potential future data collection requests from radiation employers.

Archived snapshot

Apr 22, 2026

GovPing captured this document from the original source. If the source has since changed or been removed, this is the text as it existed at that time.

Guidance

Pilot study: health data and effects from radiation exposure

Pilot study to evaluate the value of occupational health data to improve the quality of the estimate of health effects from radiation exposure in the NRRW

From: UK Health Security Agency Published 21 April 2026 Get emails about this page Print this page

Summary

We plan to undertake a pilot study of electronically stored occupational health records from Springfields Fuels Ltd to see if they contain useful information about individuals:

  • smoking rates
  • alcohol consumption
  • hypertension
  • diabetes
  • exposure to industrial hazards such as asbestos We want to know if we can use this information to better estimate workers’ baseline risk of common diseases such as cancer and heart disease that are affected by these factors.

With better baseline disease estimates we hope to improve the accuracy of our estimates of potential radiation risks of these diseases.

Background

The aim of the NRRW is to provide evidence about the health effects of occupational radiation exposure by undertaking surveillance of radiation workers employed in the UK since the 1950’s. The study population is now around 300,000 workers and still growing.

A person’s baseline risk of many common diseases such as cancers, heart disease and strokes is highly influenced by health and lifestyle factors such as smoking, alcohol consumption, obesity, hypertension, diabetes and industrial hazards such as asbestos.

Currently NRRW holds no information about these factors. This means our analyses of the risks of these common diseases from radiation exposure cannot take into account the potentially large individual variability in the underlying risks of these common diseases according to these factors.

For example, we cannot allow for differences in lung cancer risk between smokers and non-smokers before investigating the risk of lung cancer from radiation exposure.

We would like to obtain information about these health and lifestyle factors for NRRW participants so we take the variation of diseases with these factors into account as we believe it would help provide more accurate estimates of the radiation risks for these diseases.

Radiation workers all undergo occupational health screening before employment and at regular intervals, usually yearly, during their working life and the records are retained long term by the employers.

Discussions with many of the employers that participate in the NRRW have identified that these employers have a mixture of paper occupational health records and more recent electronic records that might contain information about the lifestyle and health factors we are interested in.

An initial feasibility study of a small sample of both paper and anonymised electronic occupational health records of workers at the Sellafield site (formerly part of British Nuclear Fuels Ltd and now managed by the Nuclear Decommissioning Authority) revealed that information about the factors of interest were potentially available in these records. However, the feasibility study was not able to determine if the actual data recorded in the records more widely was sufficiently complete and informative to be useful since it only looked at what categories of information were available and not the actual data values.

For example, for the smoking data, it would be very helpful to know:

  • what were the proportions of smokers and non-smokers?
  • for how many people did the data change over time?
  • for the blood pressure data, what proportion of workers ever had a measurement recorded outside the normal range?

Details of the pilot study

As the feasibility study did not provide sufficient justification to seek to collect occupational health data more widely for the NRRW participants we propose an additional pilot study. Extracting information about the health and lifestyle factors from paper records could be expensive and time consuming and while collecting it from electronic records is easier, we want to have some reassurance that the data are sufficiently complete to be useful.

As we can access the data from electronic records quickly and cheaply, we plan to undertake a pilot study based on the Springfields Fuels Ltd occupational health records electronic archive. We believe there are around 7,000 archived records that could potentially be used for this pilot study with up to 36 years of follow-up.

The pilot study will extract identifying information and information on smoking, alcohol consumption, blood pressure, obesity, and exposure to potentially harmful industrial chemicals and asbestos from the electronic archived occupational health records.

These will then be matched to the workers’ records on the NRRW.

An anonymised dataset comprising the workers’ lifestyle and health information, their employment information and their follow-up data will be created.

This dataset will be used to address the following questions:

  • how does the quality and quantity of information on the factors vary?  For example, what proportion of workers smoked?
  • do workers’ smoking status vary over time?
  • how many workers have blood pressure or obesity measurements outside the normal range either at the start of employment or at any subsequent time covered by the records?
  • how do records of alcohol consumption change over time?
  • how complete is the information on asbestos exposure?
  • is there any evidence that diseases rates among the workers varies with any of the lifestyle or health factors? (for example, are the rates of lung cancer and circulatory diseases among NRRW participants different among smokers and non-smokers?)
  • is it possible to see any differences for the questions above between radiation workers and non-radiation workers? (for example, is the data more complete or information for one group?)
  • do disease rates differ, for a given heath or lifestyle factor, between radiation and non-radiation workers? Once the study has been completed the dataset will be deleted but the programs used to extract the health and lifestyle factors and to do the matching to the NRRW records will be retained so the process could be repeated with little effort.

We will seek to publish the results of the pilot study in the peer reviewed academic press (only aggregated data would be published).

Potential results and their implications

Reviewing the values of the health and lifestyle factors will provide evidence about how likely they are to have a positive impact on the NRRW radiation risk estimates in the long term. The follow-up data may provide some early indications of variability of disease rates across the health and lifestyle factors, but it is unlikely that the number of deaths and cancer incidences among these 7,000 workers will be sufficient for more detailed analyses at this time.

There are a range of possible outcomes to using health and lifestyle factors in future analyses of the NRRW.  At one extreme, the data might provide evidence that elevated risks of diseases caused by occupational radiation exposure are independent of the health and lifestyle factors.  At the other extreme, it might provide evidence of the opposite. For example, that smokers and non-smokers have different excess risk of smoking related diseases per unit of occupational radiation exposure.  It is also entirely possible that different outcomes are observed across a range of diseases where we observe excess risk from occupational radiation exposure.

Evidence for any of the outcomes would be of great interest to the national and international bodies that set the standards for radiation protection as there are very few other sources of such information.

If this pilot project is successful, then we will seek to enter discussions with stakeholders to progress to the collection of health and lifestyle factors, from both the electronic records and if possible, any available paper records, and adding it to individuals NRRW records for long term retention and use in future analyses.

If collection of these data proves successful for Springfields workers, then we aim to approach other employers with a view to collecting similar data about their employees.

If you would like more information about this work, or if you would like to know if your data will be included in the study and you would like to opt out, please contact the study team at radiationworkerepidemiology@ukhsa.gov.uk

Updates to this page

Published 21 April 2026

Sign up for emails or print this page

Get emails about this page Print this page

Related content

Named provisions

Background Details of the pilot study Potential results and their implications

Get daily alerts for UK UKHSA

Daily digest delivered to your inbox.

Free. Unsubscribe anytime.

About this page

What is GovPing?

Every important government, regulator, and court update from around the world. One place. Real-time. Free. Our mission

What's from the agency?

Source document text, dates, docket IDs, and authority are extracted directly from UKHSA.

What's AI-generated?

The summary, classification, recommended actions, deadlines, and penalty information are AI-generated from the original text and may contain errors. Always verify against the source document.

Last updated

Classification

Agency
UKHSA
Published
April 21st, 2026
Instrument
Guidance
Branch
Executive
Legal weight
Non-binding
Stage
Final
Change scope
Minor

Who this affects

Applies to
Employers Healthcare providers
Industry sector
9211 Government & Public Administration
Activity scope
Research study design Occupational health data collection Radiation risk surveillance
Geographic scope
United Kingdom GB

Taxonomy

Primary area
Public Health
Operational domain
Regulatory Affairs
Topics
Healthcare Environmental Protection

Get alerts for this source

We'll email you when UK UKHSA publishes new changes.

Free. Unsubscribe anytime.

You're subscribed!