Changeflow GovPing Healthcare & Life Sciences Injectable Bioactive Giomer Composite vs Hall T...
Routine Notice Added Final

Injectable Bioactive Giomer Composite vs Hall Technique for Proximal Cavities in Primary Molars

Favicon for changeflow.com ClinicalTrials.gov Studies
Published
Detected
Email

Summary

A randomized clinical trial has been registered on ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT07552129) comparing the survival rate and clinical performance of injectable bioactive giomer composite restorations versus the Hall Technique for managing proximal carious lesions (ICDAS 3-4) in primary molars of children aged 3-8 years over a 12-month follow-up period. The study lists dental caries as the condition and giomer and Hall technique as the interventions under study. This registry entry documents the trial protocol and recruitment parameters for interested clinical investigators and institutional review boards.

“This randomized clinical trial compares the survival rate and clinical performance of injectable bioactive giomer composite restorations versus the Hall Technique for managing proximal carious lesions (ICDAS 3-4) in primary molars of children aged 3-8 years over a 12-month follow-up period.”

NIH , verbatim from source
Published by NIH on changeflow.com . Detected, standardized, and enriched by GovPing. Review our methodology and editorial standards .

About this source

ClinicalTrials.gov is the NIH-run registry of every clinical trial conducted in the United States, plus most international trials sponsored by US-based companies or institutions. By federal law, sponsors must register Phase 2 through Phase 4 studies before enrolling patients and post results within a year of completion. This feed tracks every new trial registration and study update, around 700 a month: drug interventions, device studies, behavioral protocols, observational research. Watch this if you scout drug candidates moving into mid or late-stage development, monitor competitor pipelines, or follow rare disease research where new trials signal patient hope. GovPing parses sponsor, phase, intervention, and target indication on each entry.

What changed

This ClinicalTrials.gov registry entry documents a newly registered randomized clinical trial comparing two treatments for proximal carious lesions in primary molars. The trial will directly compare injectable bioactive giomer composite restorations to the Hall Technique (a non-restorative stainless steel crown approach) for managing ICDAS 3-4 carious lesions in children aged 3-8 years, with a primary endpoint of survival rate at 12 months.

For dental researchers, pediatric dentists, and institutional review boards, this registration provides protocol parameters useful for identifying potential collaborative sites, assessing evidence gaps in direct head-to-head comparisons of these two treatment philosophies, and monitoring recruitment status. The giomer intervention represents a newer bioactive restorative material class, making this trial potentially informative for evolving standards of care in pediatric dentistry.

Archived snapshot

Apr 28, 2026

GovPing captured this document from the original source. If the source has since changed or been removed, this is the text as it existed at that time.

← ClinicalTrials.gov Studies

Injectable Bioactive Composite vs Hall Technique for Proximal Cavities in Primary Molars

N/A NCT07552129 Kind: NA Apr 27, 2026

Abstract

This randomized clinical trial compares the survival rate and clinical performance of injectable bioactive giomer composite restorations versus the Hall Technique for managing proximal carious lesions (ICDAS 3-4) in primary molars of children aged 3-8 years over a 12-month follow-up period.

Conditions: Dental Caries

Interventions: giomer, hall technique

View original document →

Get daily alerts for ClinicalTrials.gov Studies

Daily digest delivered to your inbox.

Free. Unsubscribe anytime.

About this page

What is GovPing?

Every important government, regulator, and court update from around the world. One place. Real-time. Free. Our mission

What's from the agency?

Source document text, dates, docket IDs, and authority are extracted directly from NIH.

What's AI-generated?

The summary, classification, recommended actions, deadlines, and penalty information are AI-generated from the original text and may contain errors. Always verify against the source document.

Last updated

Classification

Agency
NIH
Published
April 27th, 2026
Instrument
Notice
Branch
Executive
Legal weight
Non-binding
Stage
Final
Change scope
Minor

Who this affects

Applies to
Healthcare providers
Industry sector
3345 Medical Device Manufacturing
Activity scope
Randomized clinical trial Pediatric dental care Caries management
Geographic scope
United States US

Taxonomy

Primary area
Healthcare
Operational domain
Clinical Operations
Topics
Public Health Healthcare

Get alerts for this source

We'll email you when ClinicalTrials.gov Studies publishes new changes.

Free. Unsubscribe anytime.

You're subscribed!