Changeflow GovPing Healthcare & Life Sciences Drug Pricing Legal Updates, IRA Challenges, 340...
Routine Notice Added Final

Drug Pricing Legal Updates, IRA Challenges, 340B Program

Favicon for www.jdsupra.com JD Supra Healthcare
Published
Detected
Email

Summary

Latham & Watkins' April 2026 Drug Pricing Digest reports ongoing IRA legal challenges with the US Supreme Court weighing certiorari, stakeholder discussions on MFN policy and Section 232 tariffs, and multiple 340B program developments including a major manufacturer's litigation challenging the HRSA patient definition and third-party data reporting requirements.

Published by Latham & Watkins on jdsupra.com . Detected, standardized, and enriched by GovPing. Review our methodology and editorial standards .

What changed

This digest summarizes regulatory and litigation developments affecting pharmaceutical pricing. The IRA faces continued legal challenges as the Supreme Court weighs certiorari, while stakeholders debate MFN pricing and Section 232 tariff implications. Multiple 340B program disputes persist—manufacturers continue challenging HRSA's patient definition, data reporting requirements for in-house pharmacies, and state-level 340B laws.

Pharmaceutical manufacturers and 340B covered entities should monitor ongoing litigation developments, as court rulings on the patient definition and state pharmacy laws could significantly reshape program compliance obligations. CMS's ongoing drug acquisition cost survey may also affect future 340B reimbursement methodology.

Archived snapshot

Apr 22, 2026

GovPing captured this document from the original source. If the source has since changed or been removed, this is the text as it existed at that time.

April 21, 2026

Healthcare & Life Sciences: Drug Pricing Digest - April 2026 #2

Jennifer Bragg, Jason Caron, Daniel Machado, Nicole Liffrig Molife, Christopher Schott, Amy Speros Latham & Watkins LLP + Follow Contact LinkedIn Facebook X ;) Embed

Inflation Reduction Act, Healthcare Reform, and General Developments

IRA LEGAL CHALLENGES CONTINUE

Drug manufacturer litigation against the Inflation Reduction Act (IRA) drug pricing-negotiation program continues, with the US Supreme Court currently weighing whether to grant certiorari.

Source: Law360.

STAKEHOLDERS CONTINUE TO DISCUSS GLOBE AND GUARD PAYMENT MODELS, MFN IMPLICATIONS

Stakeholders continue to discuss the implications of the most favored nation (MFN) policy and the recent presidential proclamation regarding Section 232 tariffs, which we discussed in issue No. 69 of this digest.

Sources: InsideHealthPolicy , PoliticoPro , NBC News , Pink Sheet ( first , second , third , fourth , fifth ), BioWorld .

Medicaid Drug Rebate Program (MDRP)

No developments to report.

340B Program

MANUFACTURER CHALLENGES “PATIENT” DEFINITION

A major pharmaceutical manufacturer has filed litigation in the US District Court for the District of Columbia, challenging the definition of “patient” under the 340B program. The current definition was issued by the Health Resources & Services Administration (HRSA) in the form of guidance in 1996, and subsequent attempts to update the definition have failed. The patient definition was previously challenged by a covered entity in the context of a HRSA audit finding of diversion, as discussed in issue No. 31 of this digest.

Sources: BloombergLaw , Law360 , InsideHealthPolicy , Pink Sheet , 340B Report.

MANUFACTURER CLAIMS DATA REQUIREMENT FOR IN-HOUSE PHARMACY DISPENSES

A third manufacturer is requiring covered entities to submit claims-level data for all their 340B dispenses, including dispenses from in-house pharmacies. We discussed these manufacturer requirements in issue No. 64 of this digest.

Sources: BloombergLaw , 340B Report .

CMS EXTENDS COST SURVEY DEADLINE

In the 2026 Outpatient Prospective Payment System (OPPS) final rule, which we discussed in issue No. 60 of this digest, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) announced that the agency will conduct an OPPS hospital drug acquisition cost survey with the intent to use the results to potentially modify the reimbursement amount for drugs purchased under the 340B program. CMS extended the deadline for 340B covered entities to respond to the survey to April 7, 2026.

Source: 340B Report.

MANUFACTURER CHALLENGES TO STATE 340B LAWS CONTINUE

Drug manufacturer litigation challenging the 340B laws enacted by various states continues.

Sources: BloombergLaw ( first , second ), Law360 , 340B Report ( first , second , third ).

After siding with manufacturers in their challenge to West Virginia’s contract pharmacy law, as discussed in issue No. 69 of this digest, the US Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit has now also issued a similar opinion with respect to a Maryland contract pharmacy statute.

Sources: BloombergLaw , BioWorld ( first , second ), InsideHealthPolicy , Law360 , 340B Report ( first , second ).

ADDITIONAL STATES ADOPT CONTRACT PHARMACY LAWS

More states have enacted or proposed legislation that would bar drug manufacturers from restricting contract pharmacy access. Some bills would require covered entities to make disclosures regarding 340B discounts. We note that legislative action related to the 340B program may have occurred in other states but has not yet been reported in the trade press.

Source: 340B Report.

Medicare Part B

No developments to report.

Medicare Part D

No developments to report.

State Law Developments

VIRGINIA CONTINUES TO DISCUSS PDAB BILL

Discussion continues in Virginia regarding a bill that would establish a Prescription Drug Affordability Board (PDAB). We discussed the legislation in issue No. 64 of this digest.

Source: InsideHealthPolicy.

MARYLAND PDAB IMPLEMENTATION CONTINUES

The Maryland PDAB has proposed an upper payment limit (UPL) for one drug. If implemented, Maryland would be the second state to impose a UPL.

Sources: BloombergLaw , StatNews .

;) ;) Report

Related Posts

Latest Posts

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.
Attorney Advertising.

©
Latham & Watkins LLP

Written by:

Latham & Watkins LLP Contact + Follow Jennifer Bragg + Follow Jason Caron + Follow Daniel Machado + Follow Nicole Liffrig Molife + Follow Christopher Schott + Follow Amy Speros + Follow more less

PUBLISH YOUR CONTENT ON JD SUPRA

  • ✔ Increased readership
  • ✔ Actionable analytics
  • ✔ Ongoing writing guidance Join more than 70,000 authors publishing their insights on JD Supra

Start Publishing »

Published In:

Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) + Follow Constitutional Challenges + Follow Covered Entities + Follow Drug Pricing + Follow Healthcare Reform + Follow Inflation Reduction Act (IRA) + Follow Medicaid + Follow Medicaid Drug Rebate Program + Follow Medicare + Follow Most-Favored Nations + Follow Pharmaceutical Industry + Follow Pharmacies + Follow Prescription Drugs + Follow Section 340B + Follow Tariffs + Follow Administrative Agency + Follow Health + Follow Science, Computers & Technology + Follow more less

Latham & Watkins LLP on:

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra: Sign Up Log in ** By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.* - hide - hide

Get daily alerts for JD Supra Healthcare

Daily digest delivered to your inbox.

Free. Unsubscribe anytime.

About this page

What is GovPing?

Every important government, regulator, and court update from around the world. One place. Real-time. Free. Our mission

What's from the agency?

Source document text, dates, docket IDs, and authority are extracted directly from Latham & Watkins.

What's AI-generated?

The summary, classification, recommended actions, deadlines, and penalty information are AI-generated from the original text and may contain errors. Always verify against the source document.

Last updated

Classification

Agency
Latham & Watkins
Published
April 21st, 2026
Instrument
Notice
Branch
Executive
Legal weight
Non-binding
Stage
Final
Change scope
Minor

Who this affects

Applies to
Pharmaceutical companies Healthcare providers
Industry sector
3254 Pharmaceutical Manufacturing
Activity scope
Drug pricing regulation Program compliance Legal challenges
Geographic scope
United States US

Taxonomy

Primary area
Healthcare
Operational domain
Regulatory Affairs
Topics
Pharmaceuticals Consumer Finance

Get alerts for this source

We'll email you when JD Supra Healthcare publishes new changes.

Free. Unsubscribe anytime.

You're subscribed!