CABG Trial Comparing Radial Artery vs No-Touch Vein Graft in Women
ClinicalTrials.gov Studies
Summary
A randomized controlled trial comparing outcomes of coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) in women at 1 year post-surgery has been registered on ClinicalTrials.gov under identifier NCT07552948. The main group includes 55 patients receiving CABG with radial artery grafts, while the control group includes 55 patients receiving CABG with great saphenous vein prepared using the no-touch technique, both for revascularization of the circumflex artery. The study examines the condition of coronary artery atherosclerosis.
“The main group is supposed to include 55 patients undergoing CABG with the use of the radial artery, while the control group will include 55 patients undergoing CABG with the use of the great saphenous vein prepared using the no-touch technique.”
About this source
ClinicalTrials.gov is the NIH-run registry of every clinical trial conducted in the United States, plus most international trials sponsored by US-based companies or institutions. By federal law, sponsors must register Phase 2 through Phase 4 studies before enrolling patients and post results within a year of completion. This feed tracks every new trial registration and study update, around 700 a month: drug interventions, device studies, behavioral protocols, observational research. Watch this if you scout drug candidates moving into mid or late-stage development, monitor competitor pipelines, or follow rare disease research where new trials signal patient hope. GovPing parses sponsor, phase, intervention, and target indication on each entry.
What changed
The document registers a new randomized controlled clinical trial on ClinicalTrials.gov, a federal database operated by the National Library of Medicine under NIH. The trial evaluates two surgical conduit techniques for coronary artery bypass grafting exclusively in women: radial artery grafts versus great saphenous vein grafts prepared using the no-touch technique. No regulatory obligations or compliance requirements are imposed by this database entry.
For healthcare providers and cardiac surgery programs, this trial registration signals ongoing comparative effectiveness research on bypass graft conduits that may influence future clinical practice guidelines. Researchers and institutional review boards may reference this study when evaluating similar graft-comparison investigations. The trial population of 110 women (55 per arm) focuses specifically on circumflex artery revascularization outcomes at the 1-year endpoint.
Archived snapshot
Apr 28, 2026GovPing captured this document from the original source. If the source has since changed or been removed, this is the text as it existed at that time.
Radial vs Vena No-Touch Assessment
N/A NCT07552948 Kind: NA Apr 27, 2026
Abstract
This study examines the outcomes of coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) in women at 1 year after surgery. A randomized controlled trial is planned, including a comparative analysis of two observed groups depending on the chosen conduit for revascularization of the circumflex artery. The main group is supposed to include 55 patients undergoing CABG with the use of the radial artery, while the control group will include 55 patients undergoing CABG with the use of the great saphenous vein prepared using the no-touch technique.
Conditions: Coronary Artery Atherosclerosis
Interventions: radial artery graft, no-touch vein graft
Mentioned entities
Related changes
Get daily alerts for ClinicalTrials.gov Studies
Daily digest delivered to your inbox.
Free. Unsubscribe anytime.
Source
About this page
Every important government, regulator, and court update from around the world. One place. Real-time. Free. Our mission
Source document text, dates, docket IDs, and authority are extracted directly from NIH.
The summary, classification, recommended actions, deadlines, and penalty information are AI-generated from the original text and may contain errors. Always verify against the source document.
Classification
Who this affects
Taxonomy
Browse Categories
Get alerts for this source
We'll email you when ClinicalTrials.gov Studies publishes new changes.
Subscribed!
Optional. Filters your digest to exactly the updates that matter to you.