Changeflow GovPing Government & Legislation GAO Finds Federal Agencies Noncompliant with Co...
Priority review Notice Added Final

GAO Finds Federal Agencies Noncompliant with Congressional Review Act 60-Day Delay

Favicon for www.gao.gov GAO Reports
Published
Detected
Email

Summary

GAO examined agencies' implementation of the Congressional Review Act's 60-day delay for major rules. From January 2021 to January 2025, agencies published effective dates inconsistent with the CRA's 60-day waiting period for approximately 119 of 462 major rules (about 25%). Officials from four agencies cited uncertainty about what constitutes the date Congress receives rule copies. GAO recommended amending the CRA to specify receipt conditions and that agencies routinely allow additional time beyond publication date.

What changed

GAO's audit found that from January 2021 to January 2025, approximately 25% of major federal rules (119 of 462) had effective dates that did not comply with the Congressional Review Act's required 60-day waiting period after publication or congressional receipt. The Department of Energy voluntarily added extra buffer time (75 days) for some rules, but no formal policy existed. HHS used the public inspection date rather than official publication date to start the 60-day clock for complex rules, reducing Congress's review time.\n\nFederal agencies issuing major rules should review their rulemaking procedures to ensure compliance with the CRA's 60-day delay, particularly regarding determination of the congressional receipt date. Agencies may consider allowing additional buffer time beyond 60 days from Federal Register publication to ensure compliance, as DOE informally does. Legislative clarification of the CRA's receipt definition would help address ongoing implementation uncertainty.

What to do next

  1. Review rulemaking procedures to ensure effective dates comply with CRA 60-day delay requirement
  2. Monitor for legislative amendments to CRA clarifying receipt date definition

Archived snapshot

Apr 16, 2026

GovPing captured this document from the original source. If the source has since changed or been removed, this is the text as it existed at that time.

GAO-26-107825 Published: Apr 16, 2026. Publicly Released: Apr 16, 2026.

Fast Facts

The Congressional Review Act requires a 60-day delay before most major rules can take effect—to help ensure that Congress can review them first. The 60 days begin when the rule is published or when Congress receives a printed report from the agency that issued it, whichever is later.

We found that from January 2021 to January 2025, agencies provided less than the required 60-day delay for about a quarter of the major rules they issued.

Officials from the 4 agencies in our review said it was hard to set dates for rules because they were uncertain about what counts as the date Congress receives them.

Our recommendations address this.

U.S. Capitol building under a bright blue sky.

Highlights

What GAO Found

For about a quarter of the major rules issued from January 21, 2021, to January 20, 2025 (119 of 462 rules), agencies published effective dates inconsistent with the Congressional Review Act’s (CRA) 60-day waiting period. The waiting period begins when the Federal Register has published the rule or the House and the Senate have received paper copies, whichever is later, and does not apply under certain exceptions, such as when agencies claim good cause.

Example of 60-Day Delay for a Major Rule

The CRA requires rules to be received by Congress but does not further define what constitutes receipt by Congress or establish what must occur for the House and the Senate to receive a rule. Officials from all four agencies described challenges with understanding what counts as the date Congress receives copies of rules. Amending the CRA to be more precise about the date of receipt, such as by specifying that receipt occurs when agencies deliver rules to an identified office or location, would help allay the confusion agencies face. Doing so would promote the CRA’s goal of ensuring a specific minimum delay in the effective dates of major rules.

Department of Energy (DOE) officials told GAO that they set effective dates for some major rules at 75 days from the date of publication in the Federal Register, instead of 60 days, which allows Congress additional time to process and receive the rules. However, no department policy formalizes this practice. GAO found that both DOE and the Department of the Treasury could have increased the number of major rules with effective dates consistent with the CRA by routinely allowing this additional time.

The Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), unlike the other selected agencies, sometimes uses a different date to start the clock on the 60-day delay period. HHS officials told GAO that for some rules, they set the effective date 60 days from the date the Federal Register displays a version of the rule for public inspection, instead of using the date of official publication, as the CRA requires. HHS officials stated they did so because these rules are long and complex and can take weeks to process for publication. As a result, Congress had less time to consider these rules before they were put into effect.

Why GAO Did This Study

Under the CRA, rules that are likely to have large economic impacts (major rules) are subject to a 60-day waiting period before they can take effect. In previous reports, GAO found that agencies frequently set effective dates (i.e., the dates when rules are to take effect) earlier than allowed by the CRA.

GAO was asked to examine agencies’ implementation of the CRA’s 60-day delay for major rules. This report examines, among other issues, (1) the number of major rules issued from January 21, 2021, to January 20, 2025, with stated effective dates inconsistent with the CRA; and (2) challenges selected agencies experienced in setting dates consistent with the CRA.

GAO identified rules with stated effective dates inconsistent with the CRA using its major rule reports, the Federal Register, and the Congressional Record. GAO selected four agencies with the largest number of rules that were inconsistent with the CRA—the Department of Agriculture, DOE, HHS, and Treasury. GAO reviewed documentation and interviewed agency officials on their policies and challenges they may have experienced.

Recommendations

GAO recommends that Congress consider amending the CRA to specify when rules count as received. GAO also recommends that Treasury and DOE amend their policies to increase the time between the Federal Register publication date and the stated effective date of major rules and that HHS take steps to ensure its published effective dates for major rules are consistent with the CRA. DOE did not provide comments. Treasury and HHS agreed that congressional action is needed and stated they intend to take actions consistent with our recommendations.

Matter for Congressional Consideration

Matter Status Comments

Recommendations for Executive Action

Agency Affected Recommendation Status
Department of Health and Human Services The Secretary of Health and Human Services should take steps to ensure the published effective date of rules is consistent with the CRA and other applicable statutory deadlines, in lieu of basing the effective date of the rule on the public inspection date. (Recommendation 1) Open When we confirm what actions the agency has taken in response to this recommendation, we will provide updated information.
Department of Energy The Secretary of Energy should adopt a department-wide policy that, when feasible, major rules should be made effective at least 75 days after the date of publication in the Federal Register. (Recommendation 2) Open When we confirm what actions the agency has taken in response to this recommendation, we will provide updated information.
Department of the Treasury The Secretary of the Treasury should adopt a department-wide policy that, when feasible, major rules should be made effective at least 75 days after the date of publication in the Federal Register. (Recommendation 3) Open When we confirm what actions the agency has taken in response to this recommendation, we will provide updated information.

Full Report

View Full Report Online

Highlights Page (1 page)

Full Report (47 pages)

GAO Contacts

Yvonne Jones Director Strategic Issues jonesy@gao.gov

Media Inquiries

Sarah Kaczmarek Managing Director Office of Public Affairs media@gao.gov

Public Inquiries

Contact Us

Topics

Government Operations Federal major rules Federal rulemaking Compliance oversight Homeland security Communications National archives Camping Federal regulations Public interest pandemics

Named provisions

60-Day Waiting Period Date of Congressional Receipt

Get daily alerts for GAO Reports

Daily digest delivered to your inbox.

Free. Unsubscribe anytime.

About this page

What is GovPing?

Every important government, regulator, and court update from around the world. One place. Real-time. Free. Our mission

What's from the agency?

Source document text, dates, docket IDs, and authority are extracted directly from GAO.

What's AI-generated?

The summary, classification, recommended actions, deadlines, and penalty information are AI-generated from the original text and may contain errors. Always verify against the source document.

Last updated

Classification

Agency
GAO
Published
April 16th, 2026
Instrument
Notice
Legal weight
Non-binding
Stage
Final
Change scope
Minor
Document ID
GAO-26-107825

Who this affects

Applies to
Government agencies
Industry sector
9211 Government & Public Administration
Activity scope
Federal rulemaking Regulatory compliance Congressional review process
Geographic scope
United States US

Taxonomy

Primary area
Government Contracting
Operational domain
Compliance
Topics
Regulatory Affairs Consumer Finance

Get alerts for this source

We'll email you when GAO Reports publishes new changes.

Free. Unsubscribe anytime.

You're subscribed!