Changeflow GovPing Government & Legislation Standard amendment approved for Bordeaux supéri...
Routine Notice Amended Final

Standard amendment approved for Bordeaux supérieur geographical indication

Favicon for eur-lex.europa.eu EUR-Lex Official Journal C-series
Published
Detected
Email

Summary

The European Commission has published communication 52026XC02087 announcing the approval of a standard amendment to the product specification for the Bordeaux supérieur geographical indication for wine. The amendment was processed pursuant to Article 5(4) of Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2025/27. Wine producers and traders using this protected GI designation must ensure compliance with the updated specification requirements.

Published by EC on eur-lex.europa.eu . Detected, standardized, and enriched by GovPing. Review our methodology and editorial standards .

What changed

The European Commission has published a communication (OJ C/2026/2087) confirming approval of a standard amendment to the product specification for the Bordeaux supérieur geographical indication. The amendment was processed under Article 5(4) of Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2025/27, which establishes the procedure for amendments to GI product specifications.

Wine producers authorized to use the Bordeaux supérieur GI designation should obtain and review the full text of the amended specification. Any production, aging, or labeling practices that were affected by the amendment will now be subject to the updated requirements. Producers should consult with their competent national authority or producer organization for details on the specific changes made.

What to do next

  1. Monitor for updates to the Bordeaux supérieur product specification
  2. Review production practices to ensure compliance with amended GI requirements
  3. Update labeling and marketing materials if required by the specification change

Archived snapshot

Apr 8, 2026

GovPing captured this document from the original source. If the source has since changed or been removed, this is the text as it existed at that time.

An official website of the European Union How do you know?
1. EUROPA
2. EUR-Lex home
3. EUR-Lex - 52026XC02087 - EN

Publication of the communication of an approved standard amendment to a product specification of a geographical indication in accordance with Article 5(4) of Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2025/27

PUB/2026/222

OJ C, C/2026/2087, 8.4.2026, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2026/2087/oj (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, GA, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2026/2087/oj

Expand all Collapse all Languages, formats and authentic version

Display Text

| | Official Journal
of the European Union | EN

C series |

| | C/2026/2087 | 8.4.2026 |
Publication of the communication of an approved standard amendment to a product specification of a geographical indication in accordance with Article 5(4) of Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2025/27 (1)

(C/2026/2087)

COMMUNICATION OF APPROVAL OF A STANDARD AMENDMENT

(Article 24 of Regulation (EU) 2024/1143)

‘Bordeaux supérieur’

EU reference number: PDO-FR-A0306-AM09 – 8.1.2026

  1. Product name

‘Bordeaux supérieur’

  1. Geographical indication type

| ☑ | PDO |

| ☐ | PGI |

| ☐ | GI |
3. Sector

| ☐ | Agricultural products |

| ☑ | Wines |

| ☐ | Spirit drinks |
4. Country to which the geographical area belongs

France

  1. National authority communicating the standard amendment

Organisation

Ministry of Agriculture and Food Sovereignty, Directorate-General for the Economic and Environmental Performance of Enterprises

  1. Qualification as standard amendment

The French authorities consider that the application meets the requirements of Regulations (EU) No 1308/2013 and (EU) 2024/1143.

The amendments to this product specification are standard amendments as defined in Article 24(4) of Regulation (EU) 2024/1143.

The application for an amendment to the ‘Bordeaux Supérieur’ PDO does not involve any of the three situations constituting a Union amendment; specifically it does not:

| (a) | include a change in the name or in the use of the name, or in the category of product or products designated by the geographical indication; |

| (b) | risk voiding the link to the geographical area; |

| (c) | entail further restrictions on the marketing of the product. |
The French authorities therefore consider that the application is for a ‘standard’ amendment.

  1. Description of the approved standard amendment(s)

Title

Trellising rules

Description

The trellised foliage height has been reduced from 0,55 to 0,5 times the spacing between rows. Also, a provision has been deleted which required the trellised foliage height to be at least 1,50 metres for vines where the spacing between rows was more than 2,20 metres but did not exceed 3 metres.

| ☐ | The amendment affects the single document. |
Title

Minimum spacing between vines on a row

Description

The minimum spacing between vines has been reduced from 0,85 metres to 0,80 metres.

| ☑ | The amendment affects the single document. |
Title

Maximum average crop load per parcel

Description

A single value for maximum average crop load per parcel has now been set at 10 000 kg per hectare, regardless of planting density.

| ☐ | The amendment affects the single document. |
Title

Pruning of the vine

Description

The pruning rules have been simplified by deleting the part setting the number of fruit-bearing shoots according to the grape variety and the planting density.

| ☑ | The amendment affects the single document. |
Title

Yields

Description

For the red wines, a single yield appears in the product specification, set at 58 hl/ha, regardless of planting density. The single upper yield limit of 66 hl/ha has also been retained.

| ☑ | The amendment affects the single document. |
Title

Update of the Geographic Code

Description

The reference to the Official Geographic Code has been updated as regards the list of municipalities in the geographical area and the area in immediate proximity and the names of certain municipalities.

There are no changes to the boundaries of the areas concerned.

| ☑ | The amendment affects the single document. |
Title

Demarcated parcel area

Description

The demarcated parcel area has been updated and the Annex amended accordingly.

This amendment does not affect the single document.

| ☐ | The amendment affects the single document. |
Title

Transitional measure

Description

The transitional measures relating to the rules on trellising and foliage height have been deleted due to changes in the product specification on these two points.

| ☐ | The amendment affects the single document. |
Title

References

Description

The contact details of the National Institute of Origin and Quality (INAO) have been updated.

| ☐ | The amendment affects the single document. |
Title

Declaration requirements

Description

Operators are no longer required to systematically send the control body the results of the analysis of lots ready for packaging. Instead, they are required to keep the relevant documents and make them available for checks.

The reporting deadline of five working days before packaging the wine has also been deleted from the product specification. This deadline is now laid down in the control plan.

| ☐ | The amendment affects the single document. |
Title

Deletion of volatile acidity value before packaging

Description

The volatile acidity value before packaging has been deleted from the product specification.

| ☑ | The amendment affects the single document. |
SINGLE DOCUMENT

Designations of origin and geographical indications of the wines

‘Bordeaux supérieur’

EU reference number: PDO-FR-A0306-AM09 – 8.1.2026

  1. Name(s)

‘Bordeaux supérieur’

  1. Geographical indication type

| ☑ | PDO |

| ☐ | PGI |

| ☐ | GI |
3. Country to which the defined geographical area belongs

France

  1. Classification of the agricultural product in accordance with the Combined Nomenclature heading and code, as referred to in Article 6(1) of Regulation (EU) 2024/1143

2204 – wine of fresh grapes, including fortified wines; grape must other than that of heading 2009

  1. Categories of grapevine products as listed in Part II of Annex VII to Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013

| 1. | Wine |
6. Description of the wine or wines

Grapevine product

Still white wines with fermentable sugars

Organoleptic characteristics

Visual appearance

The white wines with fermentable sugars are of a golden colour.

Aroma

The wines are suited to ageing (for four to eight years) and have aromas, often floral, of honey and spices.

Taste

White wines with fermentable sugars, produced from low-yielding vines, are mainly made from the Sémillon B variety, which gives round, generous wines, sometimes blended with Sauvignon B and Muscadelle B to add freshness.

Additional information regarding organoleptic characteristics

Analytical characteristics

| Maximum total alcoholic strength (in % volume): | — |
| Minimum actual alcoholic strength (in % volume): | 11 |
| Minimum total acidity: | — |
| Minimum total acidity unit: | — |
| Maximum volatile acidity (in milliequivalents per litre): | 18 |
| Maximum total sulphur dioxide (in milligrams per litre): | 300 |
Additional information regarding analytical characteristics

The still white wines have:

| — | a natural alcoholic strength of ≥ 12 %, |

| — | a fermentable sugar content of > 17 g/l. |
Prior to packaging, they have:

| — | a total SO 2 content of ≤ 260 mg/l. |
After enrichment, the total alcoholic strength by volume is ≤ 15 %.

| ☑ | Any analytical characteristics not indicated in this section are within the limits laid down in the applicable EU legislation. |
Grapevine product

Still red wines

Organoleptic characteristics

Visual appearance

No specific description

Aroma

The young wines generally develop aromas of fresh and candied red fruit that often evolve into notes of spices and cooked fruit with ageing.

Taste

The red wines, mostly a blend of the red vine varieties Merlot and Cabernet-Sauvignon and, to a lesser extent, Cabernet Franc, are round, generous and structured. In years of good ripeness, freshness can be added through the acidity of Petit Verdot N and Cot N.

Additional information regarding organoleptic characteristics

The wines have good keeping qualities and require a long period of ageing.

Analytical characteristics

| Maximum total alcoholic strength (in % volume): | — |
| Minimum actual alcoholic strength (in % volume): | — |
| Minimum total acidity: | — |
| Minimum total acidity unit: | — |
| Maximum volatile acidity (in milliequivalents per litre): | 20 |
| Maximum total sulphur dioxide (in milligrams per litre): | 150 |
Additional information regarding analytical characteristics

The still red wines have:

| — | a natural alcoholic strength of ≥ 11 %, |

| — | a fermentable sugar content of ≤ 3 g/l, |

| — | a malic acid content of ≤ 0,3 g/l. |
Prior to packaging, they have:

| — | a total SO 2 content of ≤ 140 mg/l. |
After enrichment, the total alcoholic strength by volume is ≤ 13,5 %.

| ☑ | Any analytical characteristics not indicated in this section are within the limits laid down in the applicable EU legislation. |
7. Winemaking practices

7.1. Specific oenological practices used to make the wine or wines, relevant restrictions on making them

Winemaking practice

Planting density – Spacing

Type of oenological practice

Cultivation method

Description

The minimum planting density of the vines is 4 500 plants per hectare (for parcels planted after 1 August 2008). The spacing between vine rows must not exceed 2,20 metres, and the spacing between plants in the same row must be at least 0,80 metres. This density may be reduced to 3 300 plants per hectare. In that case, the spacing between vine rows must not exceed 3 metres, and the spacing between plants in the same row must be at least 0,80 metres.

Winemaking practice

Pruning rules

Type of oenological practice

Cultivation method

Description

Only spur pruning and cane pruning are allowed.

For the Merlot N, Sémillon B and Muscadelle B grape varieties, the number of buds when pruning must not exceed 40 000 per hectare and 17 per plant.

For the other varieties, including Cabernet Franc N, Cabernet Sauvignon N, Sauvignon B and Sauvignon Gris G, the number of buds when pruning must not exceed 45 000 per hectare and 19 per plant.

Winemaking practice

Enrichment

Type of oenological practice

Specific oenological practice

Description

After enrichment, the red wines’ total alcoholic strength by volume does not exceed 13,5 %. After enrichment, the white wines’ total alcoholic strength by volume does not exceed 15 %. Enrichment by partial concentration is permitted for the red wines, subject to a 15 % concentration limit for the volumes enriched using this method.

7.2. Maximum yields

All wines/category/variety/type

Still white wines with fermentable sugars

Maximum yield:

| Maximum yield: | 60 |
| Maximum yield unit: | hectolitres per hectare |
All wines/category/variety/type

Still red wines

Maximum yield:

| Maximum yield: | 66 |
| Maximum yield unit: | hectolitres per hectare |
8. Indication of the wine grape variety or varieties from which the wine or wines are produced

| — | Arinarnoa N |

| — | Cabernet Franc N |

| — | Cabernet Sauvignon N |

| — | Carmenère N |

| — | Castets N |

| — | Colombard B |

| — | Côt N – Malbec |

| — | Floreal B |

| — | Liliorila B |

| — | Marselan N |

| — | Merlot N |

| — | Merlot Blanc B |

| — | Muscadelle B |

| — | Petit Verdot N |

| — | Sauvignac B |

| — | Sauvignon B – Sauvignon Blanc |

| — | Sauvignon Gris G – Fié gris |

| — | Semillon B |

| — | Souvignier Gris B |

| — | Touriga Nacional N |

| — | Ugni Blanc B |

| — | Vidoc N |
9. Concise definition of the demarcated geographical area

The grapes are harvested and the wines made, processed and aged in the following municipalities of the department of Gironde, based on the Official Geographic Code in force on 1 January 2025: Abzac, Aillas, Ambarès-et-Lagrave, Ambès, Anglade, Arbanats, Arcins, Arsac, Artigues-près-Bordeaux, Arveyres, Asques, Aubiac, Auriolles, Auros, Avensan, Ayguemorte-les-Graves, Bagas, Baigneaux, Barie, Baron, Barsac, Bassanne, Bassens, Baurech, Bayas, Bayon-sur-Gironde, Bazas, Beautiran, Bégadan, Bègles, Béguey, Bellebat, Bellefond, Belvès-de-Castillon, Bernos-Beaulac, Berson, Berthez, Beychac-et-Caillau, Bieujac, Birac, Blaignac, Blaignan-Prignac, Blanquefort, Blasimon, Blaye, Blésignac, Bommes, Bonnetan, Bonzac, Bordeaux, Bossugan, Bouliac, Bourdelles, Bourg, Branne, Brannens, Braud-et-Saint-Louis, Brouqueyran, Bruges, Budos, Cabanac-et-Villagrains, Cabara, Cadarsac, Cadaujac, Cadillac-sur-Garonne, Cadillac-en-Fronsadais, Camarsac, Cambes, Camblanes-et-Meynac, Camiac-et-Saint-Denis, Camiran, Camps-sur-l’Isle, Campugnan, Canéjan, Capian, Caplong, Carbon-Blanc, Cardan, Carignan-de-Bordeaux, Cars, Cartelègue, Casseuil, Castelmoron-d’Albret, Castelnau-de-Médoc, Castelviel, Castets et Castillon, Castillon-la-Bataille, Castres-Gironde, Caudrot, Caumont, Cauvignac, Cavignac, Cazats, Cazaugitat, Cénac, Cenon, Cérons, Cessac, Cestas, Cézac, Chamadelle, Cissac-Médoc, Civrac-de-Blaye, Civrac-sur-Dordogne, Civrac-en-Médoc, Cleyrac, Coimères, Coirac, Comps, Coubeyrac, Couquèques, Courpiac, Cours-de-Monségur, Cours-les-Bains, Coutras, Coutures, Créon, Croignon, Cubnezais, Cubzac-les-Ponts, Cudos, Cursan, Cussac-Fort-Médoc, Daignac, Dardenac, Daubèze, Dieulivol, Donnezac, Donzac, Doulezon, Escoussans, Espiet, Etauliers, Eynesse, Eyrans, Eysines, Faleyras, Fargues, Fargues-Saint-Hilaire, Flaujagues, Floirac, Floudès, Fontet, Fossés-et-Baleyssac, Fours, Francs, Fronsac, Frontenac, Gabarnac, Gaillan-en-Médoc, Gajac, Galgon, Gans, Gardegan-et-Tourtirac, Gauriac, Gauriaguet, Générac, Génissac, Gensac, Gironde-sur-Dropt, Gornac, Gours, Gradignan, Grayan-et-l’Hôpital, Grézillac, Grignols, Guillac, Guillos, Guîtres, Haux, Hure, Illats, Isle-Saint-Georges, Izon, Jau-Dignac-et-Loirac, Jugazan, Juillac, La Brède, La Lande-de-Fronsac, La Réole, La Rivière, La Roquille, La Sauve, Labarde, Labescau, Ladaux, Lados, Lagorce, Lalande-de-Pomerol, Lamarque, Lamothe-Landerron, Landerrouat, Landerrouet-sur-Ségur, Landiras, Langoiran, Langon, Lansac, Lapouyade, Laroque, Laruscade, Latresne, Lavazan, Le Bouscat, Le Fieu, Le Haillan, Le Nizan, Le Pian-Médoc, Le Pian-sur-Garonne, Le Pout, Le Puy, Le Taillan-Médoc, Le Tourne, Le Verdon-sur-Mer, Léogeats, Léognan, Les Artigues-de-Lussac, Les Billaux, Les Eglisottes-et-Chalaures, Les Esseintes, Les Lèves-et-Thoumeyragues, Les Peintures, Les Salles, Lesparre-Médoc, Lestiac-sur-Garonne, Libourne, Lignan-de-Bazas, Lignan-de-Bordeaux, Ligueux, Listrac-de-Durèze, Listrac-Médoc, Lormont, Loubens, Loupes, Loupiac, Loupiac-de-la-Réole, Ludon-Médoc, Lugaignac, Lugasson, Lugon-et-l’Ile-du-Carnay, Lussac, Macau, Madirac, Maransin, Marcenais, Margaux-Cantenac, Margueron, Marimbault, Marions, Marsas, Martignas-sur-Jalle, Martillac, Martres, Masseilles, Massugas, Mauriac, Mazères, Mazion, Mérignac, Mérignas, Mesterrieux, Mombrier, Mongauzy, Monprimblanc, Monségur, Montagne, Montagoudin, Montignac, Montussan, Morizès, Mouillac, Mouliets-et-Villemartin, Moulis-en-Médoc, Moulon, Mourens, Naujac-sur-Mer, Naujan-et-Postiac, Néac, Nérigean, Neuffons, Noaillac, Noaillan, Omet, Ordonnac, Paillet, Parempuyre, Pauillac, Pellegrue, Périssac, Pessac, Pessac-sur-Dordogne, Petit-Palais-et-Cornemps, Peujard, Pineuilh, Plassac, Pleine-Selve, Podensac, Pomerol, Pompéjac, Pompignac, Pondaurat, Porchères, Porte-de-Benauge, Portets, Préchac, Preignac, Prignac-et-Marcamps, Pugnac, Puisseguin, Pujols, Pujols-sur-Ciron, Puybarban, Puynormand, Queyrac, Quinsac, Rauzan, Reignac, Rimons, Riocaud, Rions, Roaillan, Romagne, Roquebrune, Ruch, Sablons, Sadirac, Saillans, Saint-Aignan, Saint-André-de-Cubzac, Saint-André-du-Bois, Saint-André-et-Appelles, Saint-Androny, Saint-Antoine-du-Queyret, Saint-Antoine-sur-l’Isle, Saint-Aubin-de-Blaye, Saint-Aubin-de-Branne, Saint-Aubin-de-Médoc, Saint-Avit-de-Soulège, Saint-Avit-Saint-Nazaire, Saint-Brice, Saint-Caprais-de-Bordeaux, Saint-Christoly-de-Blaye, Saint-Christoly-Médoc, Saint-Christophe-de-Double, Saint-Christophe-des-Bardes, Saint-Cibard, Saint-Ciers-d’Abzac, Saint-Ciers-de-Canesse, Saint-Ciers-sur-Gironde, Sainte-Colombe, Saint-Côme, Sainte-Croix-du-Mont, Saint-Denis-de-Pile, Saint-Emilion, Saint-Estèphe, Saint-Etienne-de-Lisse, Sainte-Eulalie, Saint-Exupéry, Saint-Félix-de-Foncaude, Saint-Ferme, Sainte-Florence, Sainte-Foy-la-Grande, Sainte-Foy-la-Longue, Sainte-Gemme, Saint-Genès-de-Blaye, Saint-Genès-de-Castillon, Saint-Genès-de-Fronsac, Saint-Genès-de-Lombaud, Saint-Germain-de-Grave, Saint-Germain-de-la-Rivière, Saint-Germain-d’Esteuil, Saint-Germain-du-Puch, Saint-Gervais, Saint-Girons-d’Aiguevives, Sainte-Hélène, Saint-Hilaire-de-la-Noaille, Saint-Hilaire-du-Bois, Saint-Hippolyte, Saint-Jean-de-Blaignac, Saint-Jean-d’Illac, Saint-Julien-Beychevelle, Saint-Laurent-d’Arce, Saint-Laurent-des-Combes, Saint-Laurent-du-Bois, Saint-Laurent-du-Plan, Saint-Laurent-Médoc, Saint-Léon, Saint-Loubert, Saint-Loubès, Saint-Louis-de-Montferrand, Saint-Macaire, Saint-Magne-de-Castillon, Saint-Maixant, Saint-Mariens, Saint-Martial, Saint-Martin-de-Laye, Saint-Martin-de-Lerm, Saint-Martin-de-Sescas, Saint-Martin-du-Bois, Saint-Martin-du-Puy, Saint-Martin-Lacaussade, Saint-Médard-de-Guizières, Saint-Médard-d’Eyrans, Saint-Médard-en-Jalles, Saint-Michel-de-Fronsac, Saint-Michel-de-Lapujade, Saint-Michel-de-Rieufret, Saint-Morillon, Saint-Palais, Saint-Pardon-de-Conques, Saint-Paul, Saint-Pey-d’Armens, Saint-Pey-de-Castets, Saint-Philippe-d’Aiguille, Saint-Philippe-du-Seignal, Saint-Pierre-d’Aurillac, Saint-Pierre-de-Bat, Saint-Pierre-de-Mons, Saint-Quentin-de-Baron, Saint-Quentin-de-Caplong, Sainte-Radegonde, Saint-Romain-la-Virvée, Saint-Sauveur, Saint-Sauveur-de-Puynormand, Saint-Savin, Saint-Selve, Saint-Seurin-de-Bourg, Saint-Seurin-de-Cadourne, Saint-Seurin-de-Cursac, Saint-Seurin-sur-l’Isle, Saint-Sève, Saint-Sulpice-de-Faleyrens, Saint-Sulpice-de-Guilleragues, Saint-Sulpice-de-Pommiers, Saint-Sulpice-et-Cameyrac, Sainte-Terre, Saint-Trojan, Saint-Vincent-de-Paul, Saint-Vincent-de-Pertignas, Saint-Vivien-de-Blaye, Saint-Vivien-de-Médoc, Saint-Vivien-de-Monségur, Saint-Yzan-de-Soudiac, Saint-Yzans-de-Médoc, Salaunes, Salleboeuf, Samonac, Saucats, Saugon, Sauternes, Sauveterre-de-Guyenne, Sauviac, Savignac, Savignac-de-l’Isle, Semens, Sendets, Sigalens, Sillas, Soulac-sur-Mer, Soulignac, Soussac, Soussans, Tabanac, Taillecavat, Talais, Talence, Targon, Tarnès, Tauriac, Tayac, Teuillac, Tizac-de-Curton, Tizac-de-Lapouyade, Toulenne, Tresses, Uzeste, Val-de-Livenne, Val de Virvée, Valeyrac, Vayres, Vendays-Montalivet, Vensac, Vérac, Verdelais, Vertheuil, Vignonet, Villandraut, Villegouge, Villenave-de-Rions, Villenave-d’Ornon, Villeneuve, Virelade, Virsac and Yvrac.

  1. Link with the geographical area

Category of the grapevine product

| 1. | Wine |
Summary of the link

The Bordeaux grape varieties, grown in a maritime climate, have needed stakes (‘échalas’) since the 17th and 18th centuries, followed by widespread trellising to ensure a well-distributed grape harvest and sufficient canopy area for proper chlorophyll synthesis and optimum ripeness. The various types of soils and exposures have led to different varieties being selected and adapted according to the characteristics of the environment; this explains the historical focus on blended wines. Four distinct types can be identified: – clay-limestone and marly-limestone soils, which are very widespread on the slopes of the hillsides ideal for the Merlot N variety; – siliceous soils mixed with clays and calcareous elements that are perfect for the Merlot N and Sauvignon B varieties, for example; – leached soils (‘boulbènes’) with fine siliceous elements, which are lighter soils suitable for the production of white wines; – gravelly soils made up of gravel, water-worn quartz and relatively coarse sands forming well-drained terraces that are warm and ideal for vines and the Cabernet Sauvignon N variety in particular. The ‘Bordeaux supérieur’ protected designation of origin meets requirements the producers have set for themselves over the years as compared to those of the ‘Bordeaux’ designation in terms of planting density (which is higher), pruning techniques (the number of buds is lower) and maximum crop load per parcel (which is smaller). These production conditions allow more concentrated wines to be produced, whose minimum sugar content and minimum natural alcoholic strength by volume are higher than is the case for the ‘Bordeaux’ protected designation of origin. Both the red and the white ‘Bordeaux supérieur’ protected designation of origin wines have a particular style. They are distinguished by their harmony, elegance, rich aromas and good balance, qualities that make them suited to ageing and that are derived, among other things, from a diverse biophysical environment, the vine varieties used, the way in which the vines are tended and the winemaking process. The region’s port and close historical ties with other nations soon gave rise to strong and structured trade, and the vineyards of ‘Bordeaux’ have always been oriented towards the rest of the world. Able to both benefit from and spread technical innovations, the holdings’ dynamism was boosted, allowing them to strengthen, develop and export knowhow, always in line with age-old practices. The marriage in 1152 of Eleanor, Duchess of Aquitaine, to Henry Plantagenet, the future king of England, paved the way for extensive trade. The English exported food, textiles and metals and imported Bordeaux wines. In the 17th century, a new commercial era began as new consumers emerged. Exports continue to account for a large part of the sales of ‘Bordeaux’ wines, and the expertise, image and reputation associated with wines with the ‘Bordeaux supérieur’ protected designation of origin, two thirds of which are still bottled at the winery, are thus spread across the world too. The wines have a more complex structure than wines with the ‘Bordeaux’ protected designation of origin and can be aged for longer, up to five or six years.

  1. Further applicable requirements

Title of the requirement/derogation

Area in immediate proximity

Legal framework

National legislation

Type of further requirement/derogation

Derogation concerning production in the demarcated geographical area

Description of the requirement/derogation

The area in immediate proximity, defined by derogation for making, processing and ageing the wines, comprises the territory of the following municipalities, based on the Official Geographic Code in force on 1 January 2025: – Department of Dordogne: Le Fleix, Fougueyrolles, Gageac-et-Rouillac, Gardonne, Minzac, Pomport, Port-Sainte-Foy-et-Ponchapt, Razac-de-Saussignac, Saint-Antoine-de-Breuilh, Saint-Seurin-de-Prats, Saussignac, Thénac and Villefranche-de-Lonchat. – Department of Lot-et-Garonne: Baleyssagues, Cocumont, Duras, Esclottes, Loubès-Bernac, Sainte-Colombe-de-Duras, Savignac-de-Duras and Villeneuve-de-Duras.

In accordance with Article 5(1) of Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2019/33, the area in immediate proximity corresponds to an area in the immediate proximity of the demarcated area in question.

Title of the requirement/derogation

Larger geographical unit

Legal framework

National legislation

Type of further requirement/derogation

Additional provisions relating to labelling

Description of the requirement/derogation

Wines with this protected designation of origin may specify the broader geographical unit ‘Vin de Bordeaux’ or ‘Grand Vin de Bordeaux’ on their labels. The size of the letters used for the broader geographical unit are not larger, either in height or width, than two thirds of the size of the letters used for the name of the protected designation of origin.

Electronic (URL) reference to publication of the product specification

https://info.agriculture.gouv.fr/boagri/document_administratif-c21441ef-7d2d-4a6d-9ac6-7c777d6b592e

(1) Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2025/27 of 30 October 2024 supplementing Regulation (EU) 2024/1143 of the European Parliament and of the Council with rules concerning the registration and the protection of geographical indications, traditional specialities guaranteed and optional quality terms and repealing Delegated Regulation (EU) No 664/2014 (OJ L, 2025/27, 15.1.2025, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg_del/2025/27/oj).

ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2026/2087/oj

ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)

Top

Named provisions

Article 5(4) of Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2025/27

Get daily alerts for EUR-Lex Official Journal C-series

Daily digest delivered to your inbox.

Free. Unsubscribe anytime.

About this page

What is GovPing?

Every important government, regulator, and court update from around the world. One place. Real-time. Free. Our mission

What's from the agency?

Source document text, dates, docket IDs, and authority are extracted directly from EC.

What's AI-generated?

The summary, classification, recommended actions, deadlines, and penalty information are AI-generated from the original text and may contain errors. Always verify against the source document.

Last updated

Classification

Agency
EC
Published
April 8th, 2026
Instrument
Notice
Legal weight
Non-binding
Stage
Final
Change scope
Minor
Document ID
OJ C/2026/2087, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2026/2087/oj
Docket
52026XC02087

Who this affects

Applies to
Food manufacturers Retailers Importers and exporters
Industry sector
3114 Food & Beverage Manufacturing
Activity scope
Wine production GI labeling Agricultural product marketing
Geographic scope
European Union EU

Taxonomy

Primary area
Agriculture
Operational domain
Regulatory Affairs
Topics
Consumer Protection International Trade

Get alerts for this source

We'll email you when EUR-Lex Official Journal C-series publishes new changes.

Free. Unsubscribe anytime.

You're subscribed!