Changeflow GovPing Government General AG Torrez Supports DC Challenge to Trump Nation...
Priority review Enforcement Added Final

AG Torrez Supports DC Challenge to Trump National Guard Deployment

Favicon for www.nmag.gov AG: New Mexico Press Releases
Filed September 15th, 2025
Detected March 21st, 2026
Email

Summary

New Mexico Attorney General Raúl Torrez joined 22 other attorneys general in filing an amicus brief supporting D.C.'s challenge to the Trump Administration's National Guard deployment. The brief argues that deploying National Guard troops without the District of Columbia's consent is unlawful and unconstitutional, potentially impacting federal-state relations and the use of military for domestic law enforcement.

What changed

New Mexico Attorney General Raúl Torrez, alongside a coalition of 22 other state attorneys general, has filed an amicus brief in support of D.C. Attorney General Brian Schwalb's lawsuit. The brief challenges the Trump Administration's deployment of National Guard troops to the District of Columbia, asserting that such deployments without the consent of local elected leaders are unlawful, unconstitutional, and undemocratic. The filing specifically urges the District Court for the District of Columbia to grant a preliminary injunction, arguing that the Constitution prohibits the use of soldiers for local law enforcement and that such actions upset the balance between civilian and military authority, infringe on state police powers, and divert National Guard resources from essential functions.

This action signals a significant legal challenge to federal overreach and the use of military personnel for domestic policing. Regulated entities, particularly those in government contracting or those concerned with civil liberties and federalism, should note the arguments presented regarding the limits of federal power and the reserved police powers of states and localities. While this is an amicus brief and not a direct mandate, it reflects a coordinated legal strategy by state attorneys general to contest federal actions perceived as exceeding constitutional boundaries. Compliance officers should monitor the outcome of this case as it may set precedents for future federal deployments and the interpretation of constitutional limits on executive power.

What to do next

  1. Monitor D.C. v. Trump National Guard case for legal precedent on federal deployments
  2. Review internal policies related to federal law enforcement interactions and civil liberties

Source document (simplified)

View All Press Releases

Attorney General Raúl Torrez Joins Multistate Coalition in Support of D.C.’s Challenge to Trump National Guard Takeover

  • September 15, 2025

Albuququerque, NM — New Mexico Attorney General Raúl Torrez today filed an amicus brief in support of D.C. Attorney General Brian Schwalb’s lawsuit challenging the Trump Administration’s unlawful deployment of National Guard troops to the District of Columbia.

Attorney General Torrez joined a coalition of 22 attorneys general in asserting that the deployment of National Guard troops without the consent of the District of Columbia’s elected leaders is unlawful, unconstitutional, and undemocratic.

“The idea of sending military personnel into American cities to patrol our streets and police our residents goes against everything this country stands for,” Attorney General Raúl Torrez said. “These federal deployments of armed troops — who have no official police powers — violate our Constitution and create needless fear in our communities. I will continue to uphold our laws and our Constitution to ensure our communities remain safe and free from unlawful federal overreach.”

While California and D.C. were the first places subjected to unlawful federalized deployments, President Trump has made clear that this is the beginning — not the end — of the military occupation of American cities.

In the brief, Attorney General Torrez and the coalition urge the District Court for the District of Columbia to grant a preliminary injunction and make clear that the Constitution prohibits the use of soldiers as local law enforcement.

The experience of California, as the first state to experience President Trump’s deployment of the National Guard without its Governor’s consent, serves as a warning of the harm caused by a continuous military presence in a state. For more than three months, federalized California National Guard troops have been deployed in California’s communities.

During this time, the troops’ presence has stoked fear among Californians, causing the public to stay home, fail to report for work, and avoid areas where the military is deployed. The use of federalized National Guard troops has damaged trust between local law enforcement and the community, as troops have been tasked with civilian law enforcement and were widely present during immigration raids in the first few weeks of their deployment.

These troops were diverted away from essential state functions, like fighting wildfires. In June 2025, the majority of California’s Guard’s specialized fire crews were diverted from the wildfire-fighting task force in the midst of peak fire season and instead deployed into the streets of Los Angeles.

With California’s recent experience as a lesson, Attorney General Torrez and the coalition argue that:

  • Using the military for local law enforcement, as the President has done in the District, upsets the careful balance between civilian and military authority set forth in the Constitution.
  • The deployment of National Guard troops infringes on the police powers reserved to States and localities. The Constitution establishes a federal government of limited, enumerated powers — general police power is not among them.
  • National Guard troops are not prepared to engage in civilian law enforcement, lacking training in criminal procedure, civil rights, criminal investigation, and de-escalation. This introduces complications and dangers to both the public and the troops engaging with them.
  • States need the National Guard to be available for vital natural disaster and security functions. Attorneys General Torrez joins the attorneys general of California, Maryland, Arizona, Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, Hawaiʻi, Illinois, Maine, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, Nevada, New Jersey, New York, North Carolina, Oregon, Rhode Island, Vermont, Washington, and Wisconsin in filing the brief.

Amicus Brief

Most Viewed

Source

Analysis generated by AI. Source diff and links are from the original.

Classification

Agency
GP
Filed
September 15th, 2025
Instrument
Enforcement
Legal weight
Non-binding
Stage
Final
Change scope
Substantive

Who this affects

Applies to
Government agencies
Industry sector
9211 Government & Public Administration
Activity scope
Law Enforcement Federal Deployments
Geographic scope
United States US

Taxonomy

Primary area
Judicial Administration
Operational domain
Legal
Topics
Constitutional Law Federalism Civil Liberties

Get Government General alerts

Weekly digest. AI-summarized, no noise.

Free. Unsubscribe anytime.

Get alerts for this source

We'll email you when AG: New Mexico Press Releases publishes new changes.

Free. Unsubscribe anytime.