Changeflow GovPing Government General Oregon AG Challenges EPA Rescission of Greenhou...
Priority review Enforcement Removed Final

Oregon AG Challenges EPA Rescission of Greenhouse Gas Endangerment Finding

Favicon for www.doj.state.or.us AG: Oregon Media Releases
Filed March 19th, 2026
Detected March 20th, 2026
Email

Summary

Oregon Attorney General Dan Rayfield, leading a coalition of 36 other states, counties, and cities, has challenged the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) decision to rescind its 2009 Endangerment Finding. This finding determined that greenhouse gas pollution from motor vehicles drives climate change and endangers public health and welfare, forming the basis for federal vehicle emission standards.

What changed

Attorney General Rayfield, joined by a coalition of 36 other states, counties, and cities, has filed a legal challenge against the EPA's rescission of its 2009 Endangerment Finding. This finding, established after the Supreme Court's decision in Massachusetts v. EPA, confirmed the EPA's authority under the Clean Air Act to regulate greenhouse gas emissions from motor vehicles that endanger public health and welfare. The EPA's rescission attempts to repeal all motor vehicle greenhouse gas standards, which the coalition argues is based on flawed legal interpretations and disregards decades of scientific evidence on climate change.

The practical implications of this challenge are significant for regulated entities and public health. The rescission by the EPA, if allowed to stand, would eliminate existing and future federal vehicle greenhouse gas emission standards. The coalition contends this action violates the EPA's legal obligations and its mission to protect public health and welfare, citing the severe impacts of climate change already experienced in Oregon, including wildfire smoke, flooding, and increased healthcare costs. The lawsuit aims to reinstate the endangerment finding and the associated emission standards.

What to do next

  1. Review the legal challenge filed by the coalition of states, counties, and cities.
  2. Monitor EPA's response and any court rulings regarding the rescission of the Endangerment Finding.
  3. Assess potential impacts on existing and future vehicle emission standards and related compliance obligations.

Source document (simplified)

News & Media Releases

- Media Releases

  • #### Search by Keyword
  • #### Filter by News Category

OCPA Privacy Law Hate and Bias Crimes Voting and Elections
- #### View Prior News

  • From:

- To:

Attorney General Rayfield Challenges Unlawful Rescission of Landmark 2009 Greenhouse Gas Endangerment Finding

March 19, 2026 • Posted in Homepage, Lawsuits and Letters, Media Release

Coalition of States, Counties, and Cities Across the Country Mount Legal Challenge in Opposition to EPA’s Unlawful Rollback

Attorney General Dan Rayfield and a coalition of 36 other states, counties and cities today challenged the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s unlawful attempt to rescind its 2009 Endangerment Finding – the agency’s major determination that greenhouse gas pollution from motor vehicles drives climate change and endangers public health and welfare.

“Oregonians don’t have to look far to see what’s at stake – from wildfire smoke choking our summers to flooding threatening our communities,” said Attorney General Rayfield. “These vehicle emission standards exist because the science is overwhelming and the law is clear. The EPA is trying to roll back rules that protect the air we breathe, preserve our infrastructure and even lower health care costs.” ****

The 2009 Endangerment Finding was the direct result of the landmark 2007 Supreme Court decision in Massachusetts v. EPA, which confirmed that the Clean Air Act authorizes EPA to regulate greenhouse gas emissions that endanger public health and welfare. Based on years of rigorous scientific analysis and review, in 2009 EPA determined that emissions from motor vehicles contribute to air pollution that harms public health and the environment.  EPA then set federal standards to limit those emissions, which have led to significant reductions in greenhouse gas emissions from motor vehicles.

Now, almost two decades later, EPA has rushed a rulemaking process to rescind the Endangerment Finding and repeal all motor vehicles greenhouse gas standards, blatantly disregarding the law and science. EPA’s rescission is based on flawed interpretations of the law — previously rejected by the Supreme Court — that the agency lacks authority to regulate greenhouse gas emissions. The rescission also ignores decades of peer-reviewed scientific evidence confirming the reality and severity of climate change. By eliminating all existing and future federal vehicle greenhouse gas emission standards, the rule violates EPA’s legal obligations, fundamental principles of administrative law, and its mission to protect public health and welfare.

Oregonians from every corner of the state have experienced the devastating impacts of climate change. These impacts include choking wildfire smoke, deadly heat, flooding, landslides, transportation system disruption, drought, damaged fisheries, burnt forests, and the costs to taxpayers of responding to many of these impacts, to name a few. The Oregon Health Authority has determined that additional costs for smoke-related asthma emergency department visits alone—not including other smoke-related impacts or other asthma-related costs—will add an estimated $99.7 million to health care costs in Oregon in the 2050s.

Today’s lawsuit is the latest action taken by Attorney General Rayfield and the coalition in their ongoing effort to fight back against EPA’s unlawful rescission of the 2009 Endangerment Finding.  In the fall of 2025,  23 attorneys general and seven counties and cities in submitting two comment letters urging EPA to abandon the proposal, arguing that it would violate settled law, clear Supreme Court precedent, and scientific consensus, endanger hundreds of millions of Americans—particularly communities disproportionately burdened by environmental harms—and cause unprecedented disruption to the regulatory landscape with catastrophic consequences for residents, industries, natural resources, and public investments.

Attorney General Rayfield **** is joined in filing this challenge by the attorneys general of: Arizona, California, Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, Hawai‘i, Illinois, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, Nevada, North Carolina, Rhode Island, Vermont, Virginia, Washington, Wisconsin, the District of Columbia. In addition, this challenge is joined by Pennsylvania Governor Josh Shapiro; City of Boston, Massachusetts; City of Chicago, Illinois; City of Cleveland, Ohio; City of Columbus, Ohio; City and County of Denver, Colorado; City of Los Angeles, California; City of New York, New York; City and County of San Francisco, California; County of Santa Clara, California; and Harris County, Texas.

Share Share Share Email Print

Named provisions

Endangerment Finding

Source

Analysis generated by AI. Source diff and links are from the original.

Classification

Agency
GP
Filed
March 19th, 2026
Instrument
Enforcement
Legal weight
Non-binding
Stage
Final
Change scope
Substantive
Document ID
Petition for Review - Endangerment Finding
Supersedes
2009 Endangerment Finding

Who this affects

Applies to
Government agencies
Industry sector
3254 Pharmaceutical Manufacturing
Activity scope
Greenhouse Gas Emissions Regulation Vehicle Emission Standards
Geographic scope
United States US

Taxonomy

Primary area
Environmental Protection
Operational domain
Legal
Topics
Climate Change Administrative Law Public Health

Get Government General alerts

Weekly digest. AI-summarized, no noise.

Free. Unsubscribe anytime.

Get alerts for this source

We'll email you when AG: Oregon Media Releases publishes new changes.

Free. Unsubscribe anytime.