Changeflow GovPing Government Accountability GAO Report on Federal Agency Whistleblower Prot...
Routine Notice Added Final

GAO Report on Federal Agency Whistleblower Protections

Favicon for www.gao.gov GAO Reports & Testimonies
Published March 3rd, 2026
Detected March 3rd, 2026
Email

Summary

A GAO report highlights that federal agencies employ various methods to encourage and protect whistleblowers, such as confidentiality and award programs. The report notes challenges like processing high volumes of reports and addresses concerns about overly broad non-disclosure agreements impacting employees' ability to report wrongdoing.

What changed

The Government Accountability Office (GAO) has released a report (GAO-26-107650) detailing the practices federal agencies use to protect whistleblowers and encourage reporting of waste, fraud, and abuse. The report identifies mechanisms like confidentiality, award programs, and investigations into retaliation, noting that agencies like the IRS, SEC, OSHA, and FTC utilize these to varying degrees. It also points out challenges such as high report volumes and the impact of non-disclosure agreements on employees' willingness to report wrongdoing.

While this report is primarily informational and does not impose new direct obligations, it serves as a resource for understanding existing whistleblower protection frameworks within federal agencies. Employers, particularly those contracting with or regulated by federal agencies, should be aware of these protections and the GAO's findings regarding agency practices. The report implicitly encourages a review of internal employment practices to ensure they do not disincentivize reporting and to align with government expectations on whistleblower support.

Source document (simplified)

GAO-26-107650 Published: Mar 03, 2026. Publicly Released: Mar 03, 2026.

Fast Facts

Tips from whistleblowers can play an important role in reports of waste, fraud, and abuse in the federal government.

In our review of private sector employment practices, we found that practices that create trust may incentivize employees to report potential wrongdoing. Fear of adverse outcomes or retaliation may disincentivize them. We looked at a sample of federal agencies and found that they have various ways to encourage and protect whistleblowers. For example, the agencies we looked at use confidentiality to protect whistleblowers’ identities. Agencies also told us they have challenges, such as processing high volumes of reports.

A silver whistle on a silver keyboard

Highlights

What GAO Found

Tips and disclosures from the public, including workers, are an important source of information for agencies that enforce the law or issue regulations. However, workers who wish to notify agencies of potential wrongdoing risk reprisals from their employers and may have concerns about what their organizations’ non-disclosure and employment agreements allow.

Differences in mission and statutory authority mean that federal agencies use a variety of mechanisms to protect disclosers and encourage them to report wrongdoing. These range from providing confidentiality to those who come forward with information to incentivizing disclosures through award programs. In addition, some agencies have warned that organizations’ overly broad non-disclosure agreements are unenforceable if they contain language that restricts employees’ ability to report concerns about wrongdoing to the government.

Mechanisms Selected Federal Agencies Report Using to Protect Disclosers

| Agency | Pays Awards for Disclosures | Investigates Retaliation | Provides Relief for Retaliation | Provides Confidentiality |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Internal Revenue Service | Yes | N/A | N/A | Yes |
| Securities and Exchange Commission | Yes | Yes | N/A | Yes |
| Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) | N/A | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Federal Trade Commission (FTC) | N/A | N/A | N/A | Yes |
Source: GAO Analysis of Agency Statutes and Annual Reports. | GAO-26-107650

Notes: For OSHA, confidentiality is only offered to certain non-complainant witnesses. FTC officials told us that, depending on circumstances, some instances of retaliation may violate the laws they enforce. Use of “N/A” indicates that the agency did not report using the mechanism.

Agency officials noted that accepting disclosures from the public may lead to challenges. For example, serving as a witness may risk revealing the discloser’s identity, and agencies generally consult with disclosers about these risks.

Disclosures also lead to benefits, for both the government and disclosers. Enforcement work by the Federal Trade Commission (FTC), the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), and Internal Revenue Service (IRS), using information from the public, has resulted in billions of dollars in collections returned to the U.S. Treasury since 2019. The Occupational Safety and Health Administration’s (OSHA) findings in retaliation cases have also led to employee reinstatement, as well as awards of backpay, attorney fees, and compensatory damages.

Why GAO Did This Study

Private sector employment practices can have adverse impacts on employees' willingness to report potentially illegal activity to federal authorities. However, federal law offers protections for disclosures and some agencies provide monetary incentives for information that leads to recovered funds that can help to encourage disclosures.

GAO was asked to review issues related to the potential effects of non-disclosure agreements on disclosures to FTC and other federal agencies. This report describes (1) employment practices that provide incentives or disincentives to employees who disclose potential wrongdoing, (2) mechanisms used to enforce private sector whistleblower protections, and (3) challenges selected federal agencies say they face in receiving tips and disclosures as well as the benefits of enforcing whistleblower protections.

GAO selected agencies using judgmental criteria to ensure representation across agency programs: 1) providing retaliation protection in the employment context, 2) acting against NDAs that prevent disclosure to the federal government, or 3) providing monetary rewards to individuals who disclose wrongdoing.

GAO analyzed documents and collected testimonial information from four agencies and six organizations with direct experience of issues relating to making and receiving disclosures. We used this to describe incentives and disincentives to disclosures, protections for disclosers, enforcement mechanisms used to protect disclosers, as well as challenges and benefits experienced by these agencies.

For more information, contact Yvonne Jones at JonesY@gao.gov.

Full Report

View Full Report Online

Highlights Page (1 page)

Full Report (39 pages)

GAO Contacts

Yvonne Jones Director Strategic Issues jonesy@gao.gov

Media Inquiries

Sarah Kaczmarek Managing Director Office of Public Affairs media@gao.gov

Public Inquiries

Contact Us

Topics

Justice and Law Enforcement Whistleblowers Postal service employees Criminal investigations Collective bargaining agreements Confidential communications Consumer complaints Compliance oversight Securities fraud Financial instruments Whistleblower protection

Source

Analysis generated by AI. Source diff and links are from the original.

Classification

Agency
Various Federal Agencies
Published
March 3rd, 2026
Instrument
Notice
Legal weight
Non-binding
Stage
Final
Change scope
Minor

Who this affects

Applies to
Government agencies Employers
Geographic scope
National (US)

Taxonomy

Primary area
Government Contracting
Operational domain
Compliance
Topics
Whistleblower Protections Employment Law Agency Enforcement

Get Government Accountability alerts

Weekly digest. AI-summarized, no noise.

Free. Unsubscribe anytime.

Get alerts for this source

We'll email you when GAO Reports & Testimonies publishes new changes.

Free. Unsubscribe anytime.