Courts & Litigation

Seeley v. Urwell Diversified Holdings - Appeal of Real Estate Transaction Judgment

The California Court of Appeal has issued a non-precedential opinion in Seeley v. Urwell Diversified Holdings. The case involves competing claims related to real estate transactions where buyers fraudulently accepted loans. The appellate court affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded the judgment from the Superior Court of Riverside County.

Fix the City Inc. v. City of Los Angeles - Legal Opinion

The California Court of Appeal affirmed a lower court's decision in Fix the City, Inc. v. City of Los Angeles, ruling that a city ordinance allowing mayoral powers during a housing and homelessness emergency is not preempted by state law. The court found no conflict between the City's administrative code and the California Emergency Services Act.

Woodhouse v. State Bar of Cal. - Vexatious Litigant Ruling

The California Court of Appeal affirmed a trial court's finding that Benjamin Woodhouse is a vexatious litigant. The court held his complaint lacked merit and affirmed orders barring him from future self-represented suits without pre-filing approval and security. This ruling impacts Woodhouse's ability to file future lawsuits.

Raubitschek v. County of Los Angeles - Premises Liability Appeal

The California Court of Appeal affirmed a lower court's summary judgment for the County of Los Angeles in a premises liability case. The court found the sidewalk defect was trivial and could not support liability, affirming the non-precedential opinion.

People v. Rogers - California Court of Appeal Opinion

The California Court of Appeal has issued an opinion in the case of People v. Rogers. This document is a non-precedential opinion related to a specific legal case. The court has not identified any known citations or subsequent legal actions directly related to this opinion.

Ribstein v. Marx - Civil Harassment Restraining Order Appeal

The California Court of Appeal, Second Appellate District, affirmed an order granting a civil harassment restraining order (CHRO) against the appellant. The case involves allegations of fraud and a subsequent petition for a CHRO.

People v. Quijano - Non-Precedential Opinion

The California Court of Appeal affirmed a trial court's denial of a resentencing petition filed by Maria Quijano under Penal Code section 1172.6. The court found Quijano ineligible for relief as a matter of law based on her conviction for conspiracy to commit murder and first-degree murder with a special circumstance finding.

People v. Mercado - Criminal Appeal

The California Court of Appeal issued an opinion in the case of People v. Mercado, concerning a criminal conviction for attempted murder and assault with a firearm. The court affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded the case with directions. The appeal addressed jury instructions, prosecutorial misconduct, and cumulative error.

Medina Jimenez v. Tesla, Inc. - Notice of Removal

Tesla, Inc. has filed a Notice of Removal in the case Medina Jimenez v. Tesla, Inc., case number 3:26-cv-01727, in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. The case was originally filed in Alameda Superior Court and has been removed to federal court.

Cook v. SoFi Technologies, Inc. - Civil Case Filing

A new civil case, Cook v. SoFi Technologies, Inc., was filed on February 27, 2026, in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. The case involves a complaint filed by Joshua Cook against SoFi Technologies, Inc., with a filing fee of $405.