What this feed covers
GovPing monitors slip opinions from all 13 federal circuits, state supreme court decisions, SCOTUS orders and opinions, and specialized court rulings. Every opinion is AI-summarized with attention-level ratings.
Who this is for
Appellate lawyers, legal researchers, and litigation teams who need same-day visibility on new opinions across multiple courts without checking each court's website individually.
Recent changes
Saturday, March 14, 2026
Stephen Stoute v. Joseph Aoun - Breach of Contract Appeal
The Massachusetts Appeals Court affirmed a lower court's dismissal of a breach of contract and discrimination lawsuit filed by Stephen Stoute against Northeastern University and its trustees. The plaintiff appealed after the Superior Court dismissed the case, including claims related to admission to the university's college of engineering.
Colorado Bankruptcy Court Opinion on Homestead Exemption
The US Bankruptcy Court for the District of Colorado issued an opinion regarding a Chapter 7 Trustee's objection to a debtor's claim of homestead exemption. The case involves the debtors' assertion of a homestead exemption over two adjacent properties, one with a single-family home and the other with a manufactured home occupied by their adult son.
Fifth Circuit Affirms Dismissal of Selective Building Code Enforcement Lawsuit
The Fifth Circuit affirmed the district court's dismissal of a lawsuit alleging selective enforcement of building codes. The plaintiff claimed a violation of the Fourteenth Amendment's Equal Protection Clause. The court found the complaint failed to state a claim.
Ninth Circuit Opinion: Arizona Mining Reform Coalition v. US Forest Service
The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the denial of a preliminary injunction against a land exchange mandated by the Southeast Arizona Land Exchange and Conservation Act. The court found that plaintiffs' claims under NEPA, NHPA, RFRA, and the Constitution were unlikely to succeed on the merits.
Ninth Circuit Affirms Denial of Preliminary Injunction in Land Exchange Case
The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's denial of a preliminary injunction against a land exchange mandated by the Southeast Arizona Land Exchange and Conservation Act. The ruling impacts approximately 2,500 acres of National Forest land, including Oak Flat, and a significant copper deposit. The court found plaintiffs' claims under NEPA, NHPA, RFRA, and the Constitution unlikely to succeed.
Cervantes-Torres v. USA - Amended Opinion on Coram Nobis Petition
The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals issued an amended opinion in Cervantes-Torres v. USA, affirming the district court's partial denial of a coram nobis petition. The court held that the petitioner failed to demonstrate a fundamental error regarding his firearm possession convictions under 18 U.S.C. ยง 922(g).
Ninth Circuit: Preliminary Injunction Against Montana's HB 359 Affirmed
The Ninth Circuit affirmed a district court's preliminary injunction against Montana's HB 359, which restricts 'drag story hours' and 'sexually oriented performances.' The court found that plaintiffs are likely to succeed on their First Amendment claims, enjoining enforcement of the law. The ruling impacts state officials and entities receiving state funding.
San Carlos Apache Tribe v. US Forest Service - Land Exchange Dispute
The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the denial of a preliminary injunction against a congressionally mandated land exchange involving the Tonto National Forest. The court found that plaintiffs' claims under NEPA, NHPA, RFRA, and the Constitution were unlikely to succeed on the merits, allowing the land exchange to proceed.
Estate of William Pratt v. Amisub of SC, Inc. - Certiorari Dismissed
The Supreme Court of South Carolina has dismissed a writ of certiorari in the case of Estate of William Pratt v. Amisub of SC, Inc. The court found the writ was improvidently granted, effectively upholding the lower court's decision without further review on the merits. This action pertains to appellate case number 2025-000563.
Michael Jerome Jennings v. City of Childersburg - Certified Question Opinion
The Supreme Court of Alabama issued an opinion answering a certified question from the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Alabama regarding the state's "stop and identify" statute. The court addressed whether officers can demand physical identification if a person provides an incomplete or unsatisfactory oral response.
Last 7 days
Most active sources
Browse Categories
Activity
Get daily alerts
Morning digest delivered to your inbox. Free.
Free. Unsubscribe anytime.
127 monitored sources
Regs.gov: Court Services and Offender Supervision Agency for DC
Frequently asked questions
How often is this feed updated?
GovPing checks court pages multiple times daily. Most opinions appear within hours of publication.
Which courts are covered?
All 13 federal circuit courts of appeals, US Supreme Court, and state supreme courts.
Is GovPing free?
Yes. GovPing is free. For custom monitoring, Changeflow starts at $29/mo.
Need to monitor something else?
GovPing covers the common sources. For niche pages specific to your team, add custom URL monitoring with Changeflow.
Get Courts & Litigation alerts
Daily digest of courts & litigation regulatory changes. AI-summarized, no noise.
Free. Unsubscribe anytime.