Changeflow GovPing Federal Courts Darcy v. PayPal Holdings, Inc. et al - Securiti...
Routine Enforcement Added Final

Darcy v. PayPal Holdings, Inc. et al - Securities Case

Favicon for www.cand.uscourts.gov NDCA Recently Filed Documents
Filed February 24th, 2026
Detected March 13th, 2026
Email

Summary

A new securities case, Darcy v. PayPal Holdings, Inc. et al, was filed on February 24, 2026, in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. The case involves a federal question and is categorized under Securities/Commodities. Recent filings include motions for leave to appear pro hac vice and a stipulation extending time to respond to the complaint.

What changed

The case Darcy v. PayPal Holdings, Inc. et al, bearing case number 3:26-cv-01589-JSC, was filed on February 24, 2026, in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. The nature of the suit is identified as Securities/Commodities, and it is based on a Federal Question. Recent filings include a stipulation to extend the time to respond to the complaint and continue case management conference deadlines, along with motions for attorneys to appear pro hac vice.

This filing initiates a new legal proceeding. While the current filings are procedural, the case itself may have implications for PayPal Holdings, Inc. and its officers regarding securities regulations. Compliance officers should note the case type and monitor its progression for any developments that could impact corporate governance or disclosure requirements. No specific compliance actions or deadlines are immediately apparent from these initial procedural filings.

Source document (simplified)

Darcy v. PayPal Holdings, Inc. et al

Case Number: 3:26-cv-01589-JSC Judge: Corley, Jacqueline Scott Location: San Francisco Case Type: Civil Case Basis: Federal Question Nature of Suit: Securities/Commodities Date Filed:

February 24, 2026

Last Filing Date:

March 10, 2026

View Publicly Available Documents Case Summary No summary of this case is available

Recent Filings

| Date Filed | Docket Number | Document Description |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 03-13-26 | 11 | MOTION for leave to appear in Pro Hac Vice ( Filing fee $ 328, receipt number ACANDC-21751606.) filed by James Alexander Chriss, Frank Keller, Jamie S. Miller, PayPal Holdings, Inc., Diego Scotti. (Hakki, Adam) |
| 03-12-26 | 9 | ORDER by Judge Jacqueline Scott Corley granting [8] Stipulation Extending Time to Respond to Complaint and Continuing Case Management Conference Deadlines. (ahm, COURT STAFF) |
| 03-12-26 | 10 | MOTION for leave to appear in Pro Hac Vice by attorney Lyle Roberts ( Filing fee $ 328, receipt number ACANDC-21750773.) filed by James Alexander Chriss, Frank Keller, Jamie S. Miller, PayPal Holdings, Inc., Diego Scotti. (Attachment |
| 03-10-26 | 7 | Certificate of Interested Entities by James Alexander Chriss, Frank Keller, Jamie S. Miller, PayPal Holdings, Inc., Diego Scotti (Amadon, Laura) |
| 03-10-26 | 8 | STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER / Joint Stipulation and Proposed Order Extending Time to Respond to Complaint and Continuing Case Management Conference Deadlines filed by James Alexander Chriss, Frank Keller, Jamie S. Miller, PayPal Holding |
Return to top

Source

Analysis generated by AI. Source diff and links are from the original.

Classification

Agency
Federal and State Courts
Filed
February 24th, 2026
Instrument
Enforcement
Legal weight
Binding
Stage
Final
Change scope
Minor

Who this affects

Applies to
Public companies
Geographic scope
National (US)

Taxonomy

Primary area
Securities
Operational domain
Legal
Topics
Litigation Corporate Governance

Get Federal Courts alerts

Weekly digest. AI-summarized, no noise.

Free. Unsubscribe anytime.

Get alerts for this source

We'll email you when NDCA Recently Filed Documents publishes new changes.

Free. Unsubscribe anytime.