Guallini-Indij v. Banco Popular - Opinion Amendment

1st Circuit Opinions

Published March 4th, 2026

Detected March 12th, 2026

Summary

The United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit issued an errata sheet to amend its opinion in case 23-1705, Guallini-Indij v. Banco Popular. The amendments correct minor typographical errors in quoted language and word usage on specific pages of the opinion.

View original document View source feed page

What changed

The United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit has issued an errata sheet to amend its opinion in the case of Guallini-Indij v. Banco Popular (Case No. 23-1705). The amendments, dated March 4, 2026, correct two specific errors: on page 30, line 10, the phrase "a motion for withdraw" is corrected to "a motion to withdraw"; and on page 31, line 17, the word "un-timeliness" is corrected to "untimeliness".

These changes are minor typographical corrections and do not alter the substance or legal effect of the court's opinion. Legal professionals involved in this specific case or those reviewing the opinion should note these corrections for accuracy. No new compliance actions or deadlines are imposed by this errata sheet, as it merely rectifies errors in the previously issued document.

Source document (simplified)

United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit No. 23-1705 IN RE: JUAN J. GUALLINI-INDIJ; RAQUEL MEDINA-RAMPOLLA, Debtors, Appellants, v. BANCO POPULAR DE PUERTO RICO, Appellee. ERRATA SHEET The opinion of this Court, issued on March 4, 2026, is amended as follows: On page 30, line 10, please amend the quoted language to read, "a motion to withdraw" instead of "a motion for withdraw" On page 31, line 17, please replace the word "un-timeliness" with the word "untimeliness"