Oregon v. Trump - Case Dismissed

9th Circuit Opinions

Filed February 17th, 2026

Detected February 18th, 2026

Summary

The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals has dismissed the consolidated appeals in the case of Oregon v. Trump. The dismissal was granted upon motion by the Defendants-Appellants, with each party to bear its own costs.

View original document View source feed page

What changed

The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals has issued an order dismissing the consolidated appeals in the case of State of Oregon, City of Portland, State of California v. Donald J. Trump, et al. The dismissal, dated February 17, 2026, was granted following a motion by the Defendants-Appellants to dismiss the appeals pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 42(b)(2). This action effectively ends the appellate proceedings in this matter, with each party responsible for their own costs.

This order signifies the conclusion of the appellate phase of this litigation. Regulated entities, particularly government agencies involved in legal challenges, should note that this specific appeal has been dismissed. No further action is required from compliance officers based on this specific court order, as it pertains to the resolution of a particular case rather than establishing new regulatory requirements or obligations.

Source document (simplified)

FOR PUBLI CATION UNITED STAT ES COURT OF APPEAL S FOR THE NI NTH CIRCUIT STATE OF OR EGON; CIT Y OF PORTLAND; S TATE OF CALIF ORNIA, Plaintiffs - Appellees, v. DONALD J. TR UMP, in his official capacity as Pre sident of the United State s; PETER HE GSETH, in his official capaci ty as Secretary of Defense; UNITED S TATES DEPARTMEN T OF DEFENS E; KRISTI NOEM, in her officia l capacity as S ecretary of Homelan d Security; U NITED STATES DEPARTMEN T OF HOMELA ND SECURITY, Defendants - Appellan ts. Nos. 25 -6268, 25-7194 D.C. No. 3:25- cv -01756- IM District of Or egon , Portland ORDER MURGUIA, Ch ief Judge: On January 27, 2026, Defe ndants-Appellants moved to dismiss the consolidated ap peals pursuant to Federal R ule of Appe llate Procedure 4 2(b)(2). Case No. 25 -6268, Dkt. 112; Case No. 25 - 71 94 , Dkt. 25. Plai ntiffs-Appellee s filed a response (Case No. 25-6268, Dk t. 114; Case No. 25-7194, Dkt. 26), and Defendants-Appe llants filed a re ply (Case No. 25-6268, Dkt. 115; Case No. 25- 7194, Dkt. 27). FILED FEB 17 2026 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U.S. COURT OF APPEALS 2 25 -6268, 25 - 71 94 Defendants- Appe llants’ moti on to dismiss is granted. T he consolidated appeals (Case N os. 25-6268 & 25- 71 9 4) are DISMISS ED, with each party bearing its own costs. Defe ndants- Appe llants’ earlie r motion to di smiss (Case No. 25 - 6268, Dkt. 91) is denied a s moot. This order constit utes the mandate of the cour t.