David Gorton Fined £17,527 for Illegal Waste Deposition at Devon Site
Summary
Devon waste carrier David Gorton was ordered by Newton Abbot Magistrates' Court to pay £17,527 (comprising a £1,466 fine, £12,300 in criminal benefit recovery, and £3,614 in Environment Agency costs) after pleading guilty to illegally depositing 1,368 tonnes of soil and stone at an unlicensed site near Kingsteignton between 19 July 2018 and 16 May 2019. Gorton, operating as a registered waste carrier, failed to verify the landowner had a valid environmental permit despite being told by an Environment Agency officer in 2019 to stop depositing waste at the site. The site remediation is estimated to cost at least £2.5M.
“Registered waste carriers have a duty of care to ensure that they know where they are sending their waste and take steps to ensure that their waste is handled by legal sites.”
Registered waste carriers and brokers should audit their waste transfer documentation and recipient site verification procedures. Gorton's failure to check permit status — even after the landowner claimed a license existed — was central to the prosecution. Any firm continuing to use sites after receiving regulatory warnings faces substantially elevated enforcement risk.
About this source
GovPing monitors Environment Agency Latest News for new environment regulatory changes. Every update since tracking began is archived, classified, and available as free RSS or email alerts — 85 changes logged to date.
What changed
David Gorton, a registered waste carrier operating in Devon, was found guilty of depositing controlled waste without an environmental permit and failing to comply with his duty of care under Sections 33(1)(a) and 34(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1990. The court heard that Gorton deposited 1,368 tonnes of construction waste at Little Lindridges Farm between July 2018 and May 2019, continuing even after a direct warning from an Environment Agency officer in 2019.
Waste carriers and brokers should treat this enforcement as a reminder that registered status does not insulate carriers from liability when they knowingly deposit at unlicensed sites. The duty of care under Section 34 requires carriers to verify recipient sites hold valid environmental permits before transfer. This £17,527 penalty (including full disgorgement of criminal benefit) demonstrates the Environment Agency's willingness to pursue financial recovery beyond nominal fines.
Penalties
£17,527 total (comprising a £1,466 fine, £12,300 criminal benefit recovery, £3,614 Environment Agency costs, and victim surcharge)
Archived snapshot
Apr 24, 2026GovPing captured this document from the original source. If the source has since changed or been removed, this is the text as it existed at that time.
News story
Waste carrier fined after depositing tonnes at illegal site
The Devon waste carrier was fined £1,466 and told to pay back the economic benefit he realised by his illegal activity of £12,300.
From: Environment Agency Published 23 April 2026
The landowner of the site in question was prosecuted in 2024
Devon waste carrier David Gorton has been told to pay £17,527 after he deposited waste at a site near Kingsteignton in Devon which was operating illegally.
Newton Abbot Magistrates’ Court heard that Gorton, aged 59, of Denbury Road, Newton Abbot, deposited 1,368 tonnes of soil and stone at the illegal site between 19 July 2018 and 16 May 2019, whilst operating as a registered waste carrier.
Following Monday’s hearing Gorton was fined £1,466 and told to pay back the economic benefit he realised by his illegal activity of £12,300 after pleading guilty to the illegal deposit of controlled waste and failing to comply with his duty of care as a waste carrier.
He was also told to pay the Environment Agency’s costs of £3,614 and a victim surcharge.
The landowner of the site in question, Christopher Garrett was prosecuted in 2024 after receiving multiple warnings from the Environment Agency.
Thousands of tonnes of mixed construction and demolition waste was found at the premises.
It was estimated it would cost at least £2.5M to remediate the site, which sits on a flood plain.
The deposits of waste would have significantly increased the flood risk in the area.
The landowner told Gorton he had a license in place as a waste site, but Gorton failed to check this himself.
Registered waste carriers have a duty of care to ensure that they know where they are sending their waste and take steps to ensure that their waste is handled by legal sites.
Even after being warned about the site by an Environment Agency officer in 2019, Gorton continued to make deposits.
An Environment Agency spokesperson said:
This illegal eyesore was made possible by waste carriers like Gorton who ignored the law to deposit waste at the site.
Waste regulations are in place to protect people and the environment, and it is essential that all companies follow the rules.
We would like to remind everyone who produces, transports or disposes of waste that they have a duty of care to ensure it doesn’t end up at a site like this.
Anyone who suspects illegal waste activity can report it anonymously to Crimestoppers on 0800 555 111.
Background
David Gorton was charged with two offences:
Between 19 July 2018 and 16 May 2019, you, David Gorton, did deposit controlled waste, namely construction waste on Land at Little Lindridge Farm, Kingsteignton, Newton Abbot, Devon, when there was no environmental permit in force authorising such a deposit,
Contrary to section 33(1)(a) and (6) of the Environmental Protection Act 1990, as amended.Between 19 July 2018 and 16 May 2019, you David Gorton, being a person who carries controlled waste, failed to comply with the duty of care imposed by section 34(1) and (5) of the Environmental Protection Act 1990 in that on the transfer of waste, you failed to ensure that there was transferred such written description of the waste as would have enabled other persons to avoid a contravention of section 33 of the said Act and to comply with the Duty under section 34(1) of the said Act as respects the escape of waste
Contrary to s34(1) and 34(6) of the Environmental Protection Act 1990.
Share this page
The following links open in a new tab
Named provisions
Parties
Related changes
Get daily alerts for Environment Agency Latest News
Daily digest delivered to your inbox.
Free. Unsubscribe anytime.
Source
About this page
Every important government, regulator, and court update from around the world. One place. Real-time. Free. Our mission
Source document text, dates, docket IDs, and authority are extracted directly from EA.
The summary, classification, recommended actions, deadlines, and penalty information are AI-generated from the original text and may contain errors. Always verify against the source document.
Classification
Who this affects
Taxonomy
Browse Categories
Get alerts for this source
We'll email you when Environment Agency Latest News publishes new changes.
Subscribed!
Optional. Filters your digest to exactly the updates that matter to you.