Public Attitudes to Data and AI: Tracker Survey Wave 3
Summary
The CDEI and Department for Science, Innovation and Technology published Wave 3 of the Public Attitudes Tracker Survey, monitoring how UK public attitudes towards data and AI vary over time. The survey includes an infographic of key findings and weighted data tables. No compliance obligations or regulatory requirements are created by this publication.
What changed
The CDEI published Wave 3 of its Public Attitudes Tracker Survey, monitoring UK public attitudes toward data and AI over time. The survey contains an infographic of key findings and multiple weighted data tables (CATI and CAWI methodologies). This is a research publication providing attitudinal data with no compliance obligations or regulatory requirements imposed.
For technology companies and government agencies, this survey provides insight into current public sentiment regarding data use and AI deployment. While the document creates no immediate compliance obligations, it may inform future regulatory approaches and policy development in the AI governance space.
What to do next
- Monitor for updates
Archived snapshot
Apr 15, 2026GovPing captured this document from the original source. If the source has since changed or been removed, this is the text as it existed at that time.
Research and analysis
Public attitudes to data and AI: Tracker survey (Wave 3)
The CDEI has published a report detailing the findings from the third wave of its Public Attitudes Tracker Survey, which monitors how attitudes towards data and AI vary over time.
From: Centre for Data Ethics and Innovation and Department for Science, Innovation and Technology Published 6 December 2023 Last updated 12 February 2024
— See all updates Get emails about this page
Documents
Public attitudes to data and AI: Tracker survey (Wave 3)
HTML
Infographic of key findings from the tracker survey
PDF, 399 KB, 1 page
This file may not be suitable for users of assistive technology.
Request an accessible format.
If you use assistive technology (such as a screen reader) and need a version of this document in a more accessible format, please email alt.formats@dsit.gov.uk. Please tell us what format you need. It will help us if you say what assistive technology you use.
CDEI PADAI Tracker – Wave 3 – CATI – Weighted data tables
MS Excel Spreadsheet, 309 KB
This file may not be suitable for users of assistive technology.
Request an accessible format.
If you use assistive technology (such as a screen reader) and need a version of this document in a more accessible format, please email alt.formats@dsit.gov.uk. Please tell us what format you need. It will help us if you say what assistive technology you use.
CDEI PADAI Tracker – Wave 3 – CAWI – Weighted data tables
MS Excel Spreadsheet, 1.51 MB
This file may not be suitable for users of assistive technology.
Request an accessible format.
If you use assistive technology (such as a screen reader) and need a version of this document in a more accessible format, please email alt.formats@dsit.gov.uk. Please tell us what format you need. It will help us if you say what assistive technology you use.
CDEI PADAI Tracker – Wave-on-Wave – CATI – Weighted data tables
MS Excel Spreadsheet, 260 KB
This file may not be suitable for users of assistive technology.
Request an accessible format.
If you use assistive technology (such as a screen reader) and need a version of this document in a more accessible format, please email alt.formats@dsit.gov.uk. Please tell us what format you need. It will help us if you say what assistive technology you use.
CDEI PADAI Tracker – Wave-on-Wave – CAWI – Weighted data tables
MS Excel Spreadsheet, 1.34 MB
This file may not be suitable for users of assistive technology.
Request an accessible format.
If you use assistive technology (such as a screen reader) and need a version of this document in a more accessible format, please email alt.formats@dsit.gov.uk. Please tell us what format you need. It will help us if you say what assistive technology you use.
CDEI PADAI Tracker - Wave 3 - CATI - Raw data
MS Excel Spreadsheet, 70.4 KB
CDEI PADAI Tracker - Wave 3 - CAWI - Raw data
MS Excel Spreadsheet, 2.41 MB
Details
The Centre for Data Ethics and Innovation (CDEI) conducts an annual Public Attitudes Tracker Survey to understand attitudes towards data and data-driven technologies, including artificial intelligence (AI), and how these attitudes change over time. This report builds on the findings from Wave 1 and Wave 2 of the Tracker Survey, providing insight on attitudes towards societal data use, levels of awareness and behavioural uptake of AI, expectations of AI’s impact on society, and preferences for AI’s use in society. This research was conducted by Savanta on behalf of CDEI.
Key findings:
- The public increasingly recognises the value that data use can bring to society, but there is some doubt that the benefits of data use are felt equally across society.
- The public is more likely to recognise individual-level benefits of data than the societal-level benefits. Nonetheless, the public sees value in using data to tackle what are perceived to be the greatest issues facing society.
- The greatest public concerns about data relate to a lack of secure storage leading to hacking or theft; this is possibly attributable to a heightened awareness of negative media stories around data, particularly data breaches and leaks.
- Awareness of AI is very high and has increased over the last year. That said, the public’s primary associations with AI typically reference fear and uncertainty.
- Expectations about the impact of AI on society are predominately neutral. The public’s primary concerns around AI centre on job displacement and de-skilling.
- The public expects the most positive impacts of AI to be increased convenience, reduced costs for consumers, and improvements to key public services such as education, healthcare, and policing. Concerns about wider societal impacts, such as fairness and job security, persist.
- A conjoint question was used to examine preferences for how AI is used. In line with other relevant research, the specific AI application is the most important factor in determining people’s comfort with AI being used. Risks also outweigh benefits in terms of their relative importance.
- The conjoint question findings also highlight the need for clear and effective strategies to mitigate AI risk, as well as ensuring these mitigations are clearly communicated to the public and provide sufficient reassurance.
- Members of the public with very low digital familiarity feel less in control of their data relative to the overall UK population, however they increasingly recognise the benefits of data use in society and trust accountability mechanisms for misuse.
- Among those with very low digital familiarity, changes in levels of awareness and expectations of AI are largely in line with those of the overall UK population.
Next steps
The CDEI has published this report along with relevant data tables to enable further examination of the data. Raw data and conjoint tables are available upon request from public-attitudes@dsit.gov.uk.
Along with other quantitative and qualitative projects run by the CDEI Public Attitudes team, this work forms an important part of the evidence base that informs work within CDEI and across Government. If you have any questions, suggestions, or would just like to share how you have used these insights, please get in touch at public-attitudes@dsit.gov.uk. To sign up for updates about future waves of the survey, register your interest.
Updates to this page
Published 6 December 2023 Last updated 12 February 2024 show all updates
1.
12 February 2024
Raw data files have been uploaded for Wave 3 CATI and CAWI.
The contact e-mail address for the Public Attitudes team has been updated.
2.
6 December 2023
First published.
Sign up for emails or print this page
Get emails about this page Print this page
Related content
Related changes
Get daily alerts for UK CDEI
Daily digest delivered to your inbox.
Free. Unsubscribe anytime.
Source
About this page
Every important government, regulator, and court update from around the world. One place. Real-time. Free. Our mission
Source document text, dates, docket IDs, and authority are extracted directly from CDEI.
The summary, classification, recommended actions, deadlines, and penalty information are AI-generated from the original text and may contain errors. Always verify against the source document.
Classification
Who this affects
Taxonomy
Browse Categories
Get alerts for this source
We'll email you when UK CDEI publishes new changes.
Subscribed!
Optional. Filters your digest to exactly the updates that matter to you.