Plymouth City Council FOI Decision Notice: Information Not Held, Not Upheld
Summary
The ICO has issued a Decision Notice finding that Plymouth City Council correctly handled an FOI request for information about a referendum relating to a proposed mayoral election. The council confirmed it did not hold the requested information, as any such information would be held by the Returning Officer—a separate entity. The Commissioner determined the council complied with section 1(1) of the FOIA and requires no further steps.
“The Commissioner does not require the council to take further steps.”
What changed
The ICO issued a Decision Notice finding that Plymouth City Council correctly applied section 1(1) of the FOIA when a complainant requested information about a referendum relating to a proposed mayoral election. The council confirmed it did not hold the information, noting that any relevant records would be held by the Returning Officer as a separate legal entity. The Commissioner upheld the council's response, requiring no further steps.
For public authorities handling similar FOI requests, this decision reinforces the importance of conducting thorough searches and correctly identifying whether requested information is held by the authority itself or by a distinct entity such as a Returning Officer. Authorities should ensure their FOI responses clearly explain where information responsibility lies when multiple bodies may be involved.
Archived snapshot
Apr 22, 2026GovPing captured this document from the original source. If the source has since changed or been removed, this is the text as it existed at that time.
Plymouth City Council
- Date 15 April 2026
- Sector Local government
- Decision(s) FOI 1(1): Not upheld The complainant requested information about a referendum relating to a proposed mayoral election. Plymouth City Council (the “council”) confirmed that it did not hold the information. In doing so it confirmed that any information relating to the matter would, in any event, be held by the Returning Officer – a separate entity to the council. The Commissioner’s decision is that the council correctly confirmed that it did not hold the requested information and that it complied with section 1(1) of the FOIA. The Commissioner does not require the council to take further steps.
Named provisions
Mentioned entities
Related changes
Get daily alerts for ICO Decision Notices
Daily digest delivered to your inbox.
Free. Unsubscribe anytime.
Source
About this page
Every important government, regulator, and court update from around the world. One place. Real-time. Free. Our mission
Source document text, dates, docket IDs, and authority are extracted directly from ICO.
The summary, classification, recommended actions, deadlines, and penalty information are AI-generated from the original text and may contain errors. Always verify against the source document.
Classification
Who this affects
Taxonomy
Browse Categories
Get alerts for this source
We'll email you when ICO Decision Notices publishes new changes.
Subscribed!
Optional. Filters your digest to exactly the updates that matter to you.