Home Office FOI Request on Migrant Housing Partly Upheld
Summary
The Information Commissioner has issued a decision notice regarding a Freedom of Information request made to the Home Office for information about migrant housing at RAF Scampton. The ICO found that the Home Office was entitled to rely on section 14(1) of FOIA (vexatious requests) and regulation 12(4)(b) of the EIR (manifestly unreasonable request) to refuse the information request. However, the ICO determined that the Home Office failed to comply with section 16 of FOIA and regulation 9 of the EIR by not providing advice and assistance to help refine the burdensome request.
“The Commissioner requires the Home Office to provide the complainant with advice and assistance on how they may make a refined, less burdensome request.”
What changed
The ICO's decision modifies the compliance obligations arising from this FOI complaint. The Home Office's reliance on section 14(1) FOIA and regulation 12(4)(b) EIR to refuse the request was upheld, meaning the substantive refusal stands. However, the ICO found a procedural failure: the Home Office did not discharge its duty under section 16 FOIA and regulation 9 EIR to offer advice and assistance to the complainant on how to refine the request.\n\nPublic authorities handling complex or burdensome FOI and EIR requests should note that even where a refusal is justified, the obligation to offer practical advice on narrowing the request remains. Failure to provide this assistance constitutes a separate breach, independent of the merits of the refusal itself. The Home Office must now either propose a workable refined request or explain why no meaningful refinement is possible.
What to do next
- The Home Office must provide the complainant with advice and assistance on how they may make a refined, less burdensome request
- If no meaningful advice would be possible as there is no practical means by which the request could be narrowed or refined, this must be explained
Archived snapshot
Apr 22, 2026GovPing captured this document from the original source. If the source has since changed or been removed, this is the text as it existed at that time.
Secretary of State for the Home Department (Home Office)
- Date 15 April 2026
- Sector Central government
- Decision(s) EIR 12(4)(b): Not upheld, EIR 9: Upheld, FOI 14: Not upheld, FOI 16: Upheld The complainant has requested information regarding the housing of migrants at RAF Scampton. Although it initially refused the request under section 43 (Commercial interests), during the Commissioner’s investigation the Home Office withdrew this and relied instead on section 14(1) (Vexatious requests) of FOIA, on the grounds of burden. It also said that, to the extent that any of the requested information was environmental information, it was applying regulation 12(4)(b) (Manifestly unreasonable request) of the EIR. The Commissioner’s decision is that the Home Office was entitled to apply section 14(1) of FOIA and regulation 12(4)(b) of the EIR to refuse the request. However, he finds that it failed to comply with section 16 of FOIA and regulation 9 of the EIR because it did not provide advice and assistance on refining the request, when it would have been reasonable for it to do so. The Commissioner requires the Home Office to provide the complainant with advice and assistance on how they may make a refined, less burdensome request. If no meaningful advice would be possible as there is no practical means by which the request could be narrowed or refined, this must be explained.
Named provisions
Mentioned entities
Parties
Related changes
Get daily alerts for ICO Decision Notices
Daily digest delivered to your inbox.
Free. Unsubscribe anytime.
Source
About this page
Every important government, regulator, and court update from around the world. One place. Real-time. Free. Our mission
Source document text, dates, docket IDs, and authority are extracted directly from ICO.
The summary, classification, recommended actions, deadlines, and penalty information are AI-generated from the original text and may contain errors. Always verify against the source document.
Classification
Who this affects
Taxonomy
Browse Categories
Get alerts for this source
We'll email you when ICO Decision Notices publishes new changes.
Subscribed!
Optional. Filters your digest to exactly the updates that matter to you.