CCTV in Workplace Canteen Ruled GDPR Breach
Summary
The Information and Data Protection Commissioner found that a controller violated the General Data Protection Regulation by installing CCTV cameras in its workplace canteen, unlawfully capturing employees during their break and rest time. The Commissioner rejected the controller's legitimate interest justification under Article 6(1)(f), determining that the processing was excessive and not necessary or proportionate to ensure workplace safety. The CCTV footage was subsequently used in disciplinary proceedings against the complainant for consuming alcohol during his break. Employers relying on legitimate interest for workplace surveillance should conduct thorough necessity and proportionality assessments, particularly in areas designated for employee rest and breaks, to ensure compliance with GDPR principles of data minimisation and purpose limitation.
About this source
GovPing monitors IDPC Malta Data Protection Decisions for new data privacy & cybersecurity regulatory changes. Every update since tracking began is archived, classified, and available as free RSS or email alerts — 5 changes logged to date.
What changed
The Information and Data Protection Commissioner issued a decision finding that a controller violated the General Data Protection Regulation by installing CCTV cameras in its workplace canteen. The controller claimed the surveillance was justified by legitimate interest under Article 6(1)(f) to address documented patterns of workplace misconduct, including physical altercations, bullying, harassment, and alcohol-related incidents. The Commissioner rejected this justification, finding that the processing was excessive and not the least intrusive means available, particularly in an area designated for employee rest and breaks. The CCTV footage was accessed following an internal investigation and used to support disciplinary action against the complainant for consuming wine during his break time.
Employers across all sectors that operate CCTV in or near employee rest areas should review whether their surveillance measures can satisfy the necessity and proportionality requirements under GDPR. The IDPC's decision clarifies that legitimate interest cannot justify continuous monitoring of employees during rest periods without demonstrating that less intrusive alternatives would be insufficient. Organisations should ensure their privacy notices, data protection impact assessments, and legitimate interest assessments adequately address monitoring in sensitive areas such as canteens, break rooms, and changing facilities.
Source document
This document is a large PDF. View the original for full formatting.
View original PDF →Named provisions
Parties
Related changes
Get daily alerts for IDPC Malta Data Protection Decisions
Daily digest delivered to your inbox.
Free. Unsubscribe anytime.
About this page
Every important government, regulator, and court update from around the world. One place. Real-time. Free. Our mission
Source document text, dates, docket IDs, and authority are extracted directly from IDPC Malta.
The summary, classification, recommended actions, deadlines, and penalty information are AI-generated from the original text and may contain errors. Always verify against the source document.
Classification
Who this affects
Taxonomy
Browse Categories
Get alerts for this source
We'll email you when IDPC Malta Data Protection Decisions publishes new changes.
Subscribed!
Optional. Filters your digest to exactly the updates that matter to you.