Zigler v. Lyft, Inc. - Civil Case Filing
Summary
The U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California has filed recent documents in the civil case Zigler v. Lyft, Inc. (Case No. 3:26-cv-00575-EMC). Filings include an amended complaint, motions for leave to file errata, and opposition to a motion to dismiss.
What changed
This entry details recent filings in the civil case Zigler v. Lyft, Inc., case number 3:26-cv-00575-EMC, filed in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. Key filings include an amended complaint filed on March 17, 2026, and various motions and oppositions related to procedural matters, such as motions for leave to file errata and pro hac vice appearances, as well as an opposition to a motion to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction.
While these filings are procedural in nature and do not represent a final judgment or new regulatory mandate, they indicate ongoing litigation that may have implications for Lyft's employment practices and contractor classification. Compliance officers should note the case type (Civil Case, Diversity Basis) and the nature of the suit (Contract: Other), as well as the specific documents filed, which may signal areas of dispute that could lead to future regulatory scrutiny or policy changes if the case progresses.
Archived snapshot
Mar 24, 2026GovPing captured this document from the original source. If the source has since changed or been removed, this is the text as it existed at that time.
Zigler v. Lyft, Inc.
Case Number: 3:26-cv-00575-EMC Judge: Chen, Edward M Location: San Francisco Case Type: Civil Case Basis: Diversity Nature of Suit: Contract: Other Date Filed:
January 20, 2026
Last Filing Date:
February 20, 2026
View Publicly Available Documents Case Summary No summary of this case is available
Recent Filings
| Date Filed | Docket Number | Document Description |
|---|---|---|
| 03-24-26 | 34 | NOTICE of Change of Address by Archis Ashok Parasharami (Parasharami, Archis) |
| 03-23-26 | 33 | Order by Judge Edward M Chen GRANTING [21] STIPULATION REGARDING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR CORRECTIVE ACTION UNDER RULE 23(d). (vla, COURT STAFF) |
| 03-19-26 | 26 | First MOTION for Leave to File Notice of Errata Related to [Dkt. 25] filed by Brian Robey, Lucy Ye, Tracy Zigler. (Attachments: # (1) Declaration of Raphael Janove In Support of Motion for Leave, # (2) Exhibit A - Notice of Errata, # (3) [ |
| 03-19-26 | 27 | Second MOTION for leave to appear in Pro Hac Vice ( Filing fee $ 328, receipt number ACANDC-21707694.) Filing fee previously paid on 3/2/2026 filed by Brian Robey, Lucy Ye, Tracy Zigler. (Fiest, Max) |
| 03-19-26 | 28 | Order by Judge Edward M Chen GRANTING [26] Motion for Leave to File Notice of Errata.(vla, COURT STAFF) |
| 03-19-26 | 29 | Order by Judge Edward M Chen GRANTING [27] Motion for Pro Hac Vice as to Max Fiest.(vla, COURT STAFF) |
| 03-19-26 | 30 | ERRATA re [25] Opposition/Response to Motion by Brian Robey, Lucy Ye, Tracy Zigler. (Janove, Raphael) |
| 03-19-26 | 31 | OPPOSITION/RESPONSE (re [13] MOTION Corrective Action Pursuant to Rule 23(d) ) Plaintiffs' Reply Memorandum in Support of 23(d) Motion filed byBrian Robey, Lucy Ye, Tracy Zigler. (Janove, Raphael) |
| 03-19-26 | 32 | Declaration of Raphael Janove in Support of [31] Opposition/Response to Motion Janove Declaration iso Plaintiffs' Reply Memorandum re 23(d) Motion filed byBrian Robey, Lucy Ye, Tracy Zigler. (Attachments: # (1) Exhibit Ex. A Plai |
| 03-17-26 | 23 | AMENDED COMPLAINT against Lyft, Inc.. Filed by Tracy Zigler, Lucy Ye, Brian Robey. (Janove, Raphael) |
| 03-17-26 | 24 | NOTICE of Change of Address by Raphael Janove (Janove, Raphael) |
| 03-17-26 | 25 | OPPOSITION/RESPONSE (re [18] MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction ) filed byBrian Robey, Lucy Ye, Tracy Zigler. (Janove, Raphael) |
Related changes
Get daily alerts for NDCA Recently Filed Documents
Daily digest delivered to your inbox.
Free. Unsubscribe anytime.
Source
About this page
Every important government, regulator, and court update from around the world. One place. Real-time. Free. Our mission
Source document text, dates, docket IDs, and authority are extracted directly from N.D. California.
The summary, classification, recommended actions, deadlines, and penalty information are AI-generated from the original text and may contain errors. Always verify against the source document.
Classification
Who this affects
Taxonomy
Browse Categories
Get alerts for this source
We'll email you when NDCA Recently Filed Documents publishes new changes.
Subscribed!
Optional. Filters your digest to exactly the updates that matter to you.