Zigler v. Lyft, Inc. - Civil Case Filing

NDCA Recently Filed Documents

Filed January 20th, 2026

Detected March 24th, 2026

Summary

The U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California has filed recent documents in the civil case Zigler v. Lyft, Inc. (Case No. 3:26-cv-00575-EMC). Filings include an amended complaint, motions for leave to file errata, and opposition to a motion to dismiss.

View original document View source feed page

What changed

This entry details recent filings in the civil case Zigler v. Lyft, Inc., case number 3:26-cv-00575-EMC, filed in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. Key filings include an amended complaint filed on March 17, 2026, and various motions and oppositions related to procedural matters, such as motions for leave to file errata and pro hac vice appearances, as well as an opposition to a motion to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction.

While these filings are procedural in nature and do not represent a final judgment or new regulatory mandate, they indicate ongoing litigation that may have implications for Lyft's employment practices and contractor classification. Compliance officers should note the case type (Civil Case, Diversity Basis) and the nature of the suit (Contract: Other), as well as the specific documents filed, which may signal areas of dispute that could lead to future regulatory scrutiny or policy changes if the case progresses.

Source document (simplified)

Zigler v. Lyft, Inc.

Case Number: 3:26-cv-00575-EMC Judge: Chen, Edward M Location: San Francisco Case Type: Civil Case Basis: Diversity Nature of Suit: Contract: Other Date Filed:

January 20, 2026

Last Filing Date:

February 20, 2026

View Publicly Available Documents Case Summary No summary of this case is available

Recent Filings

| Date Filed | Docket Number | Document Description |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 03-24-26 | 34 | NOTICE of Change of Address by Archis Ashok Parasharami (Parasharami, Archis) |
| 03-23-26 | 33 | Order by Judge Edward M Chen GRANTING [21] STIPULATION REGARDING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR CORRECTIVE ACTION UNDER RULE 23(d). (vla, COURT STAFF) |
| 03-19-26 | 26 | First MOTION for Leave to File Notice of Errata Related to [Dkt. 25] filed by Brian Robey, Lucy Ye, Tracy Zigler. (Attachments: # (1) Declaration of Raphael Janove In Support of Motion for Leave, # (2) Exhibit A - Notice of Errata, # (3) [ |
| 03-19-26 | 27 | Second MOTION for leave to appear in Pro Hac Vice ( Filing fee $ 328, receipt number ACANDC-21707694.) Filing fee previously paid on 3/2/2026 filed by Brian Robey, Lucy Ye, Tracy Zigler. (Fiest, Max) |
| 03-19-26 | 28 | Order by Judge Edward M Chen GRANTING [26] Motion for Leave to File Notice of Errata.(vla, COURT STAFF) |
| 03-19-26 | 29 | Order by Judge Edward M Chen GRANTING [27] Motion for Pro Hac Vice as to Max Fiest.(vla, COURT STAFF) |
| 03-19-26 | 30 | ERRATA re [25] Opposition/Response to Motion by Brian Robey, Lucy Ye, Tracy Zigler. (Janove, Raphael) |
| 03-19-26 | 31 | OPPOSITION/RESPONSE (re [13] MOTION Corrective Action Pursuant to Rule 23(d) ) Plaintiffs' Reply Memorandum in Support of 23(d) Motion filed byBrian Robey, Lucy Ye, Tracy Zigler. (Janove, Raphael) |
| 03-19-26 | 32 | Declaration of Raphael Janove in Support of [31] Opposition/Response to Motion Janove Declaration iso Plaintiffs' Reply Memorandum re 23(d) Motion filed byBrian Robey, Lucy Ye, Tracy Zigler. (Attachments: # (1) Exhibit Ex. A Plai |
| 03-17-26 | 23 | AMENDED COMPLAINT against Lyft, Inc.. Filed by Tracy Zigler, Lucy Ye, Brian Robey. (Janove, Raphael) |
| 03-17-26 | 24 | NOTICE of Change of Address by Raphael Janove (Janove, Raphael) |
| 03-17-26 | 25 | OPPOSITION/RESPONSE (re [18] MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction ) filed byBrian Robey, Lucy Ye, Tracy Zigler. (Janove, Raphael) |
Return to top