Venice Commission Urgent Opinion on Serbia Judicial and Prosecution Law Amendments
Summary
The Venice Commission issued an urgent opinion assessing amendments to five laws governing Serbia's judiciary and prosecution service, which were adopted on 28 January 2026. The opinion acknowledges objectives of enhancing efficiency and improving legal coherence, finding the transfer of temporary assignment decisions to the High Prosecutorial Council acceptable. However, the Commission identified several shortcomings that cumulatively undermine safeguards protecting prosecutorial autonomy and judicial independence, issuing seven key recommendations including limiting provisional appointments and excluding reappointments of Chief Public Prosecutors to the same office after mandate expiry.
About this source
GovPing monitors Council of Europe News for new courts & legal regulatory changes. Every update since tracking began is archived, classified, and available as free RSS or email alerts — 25 changes logged to date.
What changed
The Venice Commission published an urgent opinion on amendments to five Serbian laws governing the judiciary and prosecution service. The amendments affected hierarchical control in the public prosecution service, broadened provisional appointment circumstances, and altered temporary assignment regimes. The Commission found the transfer of secondment decisions to the High Prosecutorial Council acceptable but identified several provisions that collectively weaken protections for prosecutorial autonomy and judicial independence. The opinion makes seven recommendations: prosecutors' objections should be decided by a High Prosecutorial Council commission rather than higher-ranking offices; Minister of Justice prior authorization for international cooperation agreements should be replaced with notification; provisional appointments of Chief Public Prosecutors should be limited to one year without reappointment possibility; temporary assignments should only be to same-level positions and non-renewable; the Public Prosecutor's Office for Organised Crime should be adequately staffed through ordinary appointments; the Special Department for Cybercrime should receive greater autonomy; and fixed terms of office for court presidents should be non-renewable as a rule.
Serbian authorities who committed to addressing these recommendations should prioritize review of provisional appointment limits, secondment renewal restrictions, and measures ensuring prosecutorial autonomy. Legal professionals and judicial administrators in Serbia should monitor implementation of these recommendations, which aim to restore safeguards undermined by the January 2026 amendments. The Commission's pending June 2026 endorsement signals continued international attention to Serbia's judicial reform process.
Archived snapshot
Apr 24, 2026GovPing captured this document from the original source. If the source has since changed or been removed, this is the text as it existed at that time.
Serbia: Venice Commission assesses legislative amendments to laws governing the judiciary and the prosecution
Urgent opinion requested by the National Assembly President published
The urgent opinion will be presented to the Venice Commission for endorsement in June 2026
The Venice Commission, the constitutional expert body of the Council of Europe, has issued today its urgent opinion **** on the amendments to a set of five laws governing the judiciary and the prosecution service which were adopted on 28 January 2026. This opinion was requested by Ana Brnabić, President of the National Assembly of the Republic of Serbia.
The amendments notably affected the scope of hierarchical control within the public prosecution service, broadened the circumstances in which provisional appointments and reappointments of public prosecutors and court presidents may be used, and altered the regime on the temporary assignment of public prosecutors.
In its urgent opinion, the Venice Commission acknowledges the relevance of the objectives pursued by the authorities, namely enhancing the efficiency of the judiciary and the public prosecution service, as well as improving the coherence of the relevant legal frameworks. In that context, it finds that the new legislative solution whereby the competence to decide on the temporary assignments (secondments) of public prosecutors has been transferred to the High Prosecutorial Council is acceptable.
The Commission however has identified several shortcomings in the amendments which, viewed both individually and cumulatively, undermine some of the safeguards which existed previously and were designed to protect the autonomy of the public prosecution service and judicial independence.
It therefore makes the following key recommendations:
- Individual prosecutors’ objections against hierarchical decisions and annual work schedules should be decided by a commission of the High Prosecutorial Council and not by the higher-ranking Public Prosecutor’s Office.
- Prior authorisation by the Minister of Justice of international cooperation agreements should not be required. These agreements should simply be notified to ensure co-ordination.
- Provisional appointments of Chief Public Prosecutors should be limited to one year, without the possibility of reappointment; furthermore, reappointments of Chief Public Prosecutors to the same office after the expiry of their mandate should be excluded.
- Temporary assignments (secondments) of public prosecutors should only be possible to positions at the same level and should not be renewable.
- A mechanism should be introduced to ensure that the Public Prosecutor’s Office for Organised Crime is adequately staffed through ordinary appointments. Pending the implementation of such a mechanism, all the public prosecutors whose temporary assignments were terminated before their expiry pursuant to the amendments should be reinstated to safeguard the continuity of ongoing investigations.
- Greater autonomy should be granted to the Special Department for Cybercrime, with due respect for its specialised role and its nationwide jurisdiction.
- The fixed terms of office of court presidents should be non-renewable as a rule, with limited exceptions for small courts. The Venice Commission also underlines that legislative changes in such important areas for society should be prepared with due respect for the principles of transparency, inclusiveness, and democratic debate. Regretting that these principles were not duly followed in the process of adoption of the amendments, the Commission encourages the authorities to apply them more systematically and more rigorously throughout the subsequent phases of this legislative process.
The Commission notes and welcomes the commitment recently expressed by the Serbian authorities to take all the necessary steps to address these recommendations and stands ready to provide further assistance in this matter, notably through the assessment of the future draft legislative amendments.
The urgent opinion will be presented to the Venice Commission for endorsement at its Plenary Session in Venice on 12-13 June 2026.
Web site of the Venice Commission of the Council of Europe
Venice Commission of the Council of Europe Strasbourg 24 April 2026
- Diminuer la taille du texte
- Augmenter la taille du texte
- Imprimer la page
2026-04-24T09:32:00
-
- en-GB
-
Related news
The Week Ahead: Key Events and Meetings
resources
- Media Department
- Week Ahead
- Calendar
- Speeches
- New Democratic Pact for Europe
- Council of Europe Summit, May 2023
- Contribution to UN 2030 agenda
- Theme files
- Photo galleries
- Video on demand
for the press
Guide for visiting journalists
European Court of Human Rights RSS feeds
Related changes
Get daily alerts for Council of Europe News
Daily digest delivered to your inbox.
Free. Unsubscribe anytime.
About this page
Every important government, regulator, and court update from around the world. One place. Real-time. Free. Our mission
Source document text, dates, docket IDs, and authority are extracted directly from Venice Commission.
The summary, classification, recommended actions, deadlines, and penalty information are AI-generated from the original text and may contain errors. Always verify against the source document.
Classification
Who this affects
Taxonomy
Browse Categories
Get alerts for this source
We'll email you when Council of Europe News publishes new changes.
Subscribed!
Optional. Filters your digest to exactly the updates that matter to you.