TTAB Trademark Opposition: Cleerly, Inc. v. Clearly AI, Inc.
Summary
The USPTO Trademark Trial and Appeal Board received a motion to suspend proceedings with consent pending settlement negotiations in Opposition No. 91303737. Cleerly, Inc. (plaintiff) opposes the trademark application for CLEARLY AI filed by Clearly AI, Inc. (defendant). The motion was filed on April 10, 2026, following the original opposition filing date of December 12, 2025.
What changed
The TTAB received a motion to suspend proceedings in the CLEARLY AI trademark opposition case. The motion, filed with consent of both parties, seeks to pause the opposition proceedings while settlement negotiations take place. This is a procedural step in trademark litigation that halts deadlines and discovery while parties attempt to resolve the dispute.
For trademark applicants and opponents involved in TTAB proceedings, this action indicates the parties are engaged in active settlement discussions. Parties in similar trademark disputes should monitor the status of this case as any settlement could affect the outcome of the CLEARLY AI trademark application. The suspension pauses all deadlines but does not resolve the underlying opposition.
What to do next
- Monitor for TTAB updates on settlement negotiations
- Respond to any TTAB orders regarding the suspension motion
Archived snapshot
Apr 12, 2026GovPing captured this document from the original source. If the source has since changed or been removed, this is the text as it existed at that time.
Opposition: CLEARLY AI
Opposition TTAB91303737-20260410 Kind: OPP Apr 10, 2026
Abstract
D MOT TO SUSP W/ CONSENT PEND SETTL NEGOTIATIONS
Plaintiff: Cleerly, Inc.
Defendant: Clearly AI, Inc.
Mark at issue: CLEARLY AI
Filing Date
2025-12-12
Related changes
Get daily alerts for TTAB Proceedings
Daily digest delivered to your inbox.
Free. Unsubscribe anytime.
About this page
Every important government, regulator, and court update from around the world. One place. Real-time. Free. Our mission
Source document text, dates, docket IDs, and authority are extracted directly from USPTO.
The summary, classification, recommended actions, deadlines, and penalty information are AI-generated from the original text and may contain errors. Always verify against the source document.
Classification
Who this affects
Taxonomy
Browse Categories
Get alerts for this source
We'll email you when TTAB Proceedings publishes new changes.
Subscribed!
Optional. Filters your digest to exactly the updates that matter to you.