United States v. Hewlett Packard Enterprise Co. - Antitrust
Summary
The U.S. Department of Justice has filed an antitrust case against Hewlett Packard Enterprise Co. (HPE) and other defendants. Recent filings include motions to seal documents, opposition to motions, and replies related to the entry of final judgment.
What changed
This document details recent filings in the antitrust case brought by the United States against Hewlett Packard Enterprise Co. and other defendants, Case Number 5:25-cv-00951-PCP. Filings include motions to file documents under seal, opposition to these motions, and replies concerning the entry of final judgment. Notably, there are also motions in limine to exclude expert testimony and administrative motions for remote hearing links.
These filings indicate ongoing litigation and procedural steps towards resolving the antitrust claims. Compliance officers should monitor the case for any developments that could impact market practices or lead to consent decrees or judgments affecting the technology sector. While no specific compliance deadline is mentioned, the ongoing nature of the case suggests potential future obligations or scrutiny for companies involved in similar market activities.
What to do next
- Monitor case filings for developments regarding final judgment and potential consent decrees.
Source document (simplified)
United States of America v. Hewlett Packard Enterprise Co. et al
Case Number: 5:25-cv-00951-PCP Judge: Pitts, P. Casey Location: San Jose Case Type: Civil Case Basis: Federal Question Nature of Suit: Anti-Trust Date Filed:
January 30, 2025
Last Filing Date:
January 28, 2026
View Publicly Available Documents Case Summary No summary of this case is available
Recent Filings
| Date Filed | Docket Number | Document Description |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 03-22-26 | 454 | REDACTION to [450] Document E-Filed Under Seal,,,,, Intervenors Surrepply in Opposition to Motion for Entry of Final Judgment (Redacted) by State of Washington, State of Wisconsin, State of Connecticut, District of Columbia, State of Il |
| 03-20-26 | 448 | NOTICE by Hewlett Packard Enterprise Co. re [444] Administrative Motion to File Under Seal Certain Tunney Act Briefing Materials (Notice of Errata) (Attachments: # (1) Corrected Appendix A, # (2) Corrected Proposed Order, # (3 |
| 03-20-26 | 451 | OPPOSITION/RESPONSE (re [444] Administrative Motion to File Under Seal Certain Tunney Act Briefing Materials ) filed byState of Washington. (Attachments: # (1) Proposed Order Re Motion to File Under Seal)(Hanson, Amy) (Filed on |
| 03-20-26 | 452 | REDACTION to [438] Administrative Motion to File Under Seal Plaintiff United States' Reply In Further Support of Entry of Final Judgment by United States of America. (Arghavani, Miriam) |
| 03-20-26 | 453 | MOTION in Limine to Exclude Declarations and Proffered Testimony of States Proposed Expert Witnesses filed by United States of America. Motion Hearing set for 3/23/2026 10:00 AM in San Jose, Courtroom 8, 4th Floor before Judge P. Casey Pit |
| 03-19-26 | 443 | REDACTION - Reply in Support of Motion for Entry of Final Judgement re [436] Document E-Filed Under Seal by Hewlett Packard Enterprise Co.. (Liversidge, Samuel) |
| 03-19-26 | 444 | Administrative Motion to File Under Seal Certain Tunney Act Briefing Materials filed by Hewlett Packard Enterprise Co.. (Attachments: # (1) Declaration of Robert Particelli, # (2) Declaration of Henry C. Su, # (3) Appendix A, # (4) Propos |
| 03-18-26 | 440 | ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION Administrative Motion for Remote Hearing Link filed by District of Columbia, State of California, State of Colorado, State of Connecticut, State of Hawaii, State of Illinois, State of Massachusetts, State of Minnes |
| 03-16-26 | 435 | ORDER granting [430] Unopposed Administrative Motion to Exceed Page Limit. Signed by Judge P. Casey Pitts. (lrt, COURT STAFF) |
| 03-16-26 | 437 | CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Hewlett Packard Enterprise Co. re [436] Document E-Filed Under Seal,,, Reply in Support of Motion for Entry of Final Judgement (Spears, Courtney) |
| 03-16-26 | 438 | Administrative Motion to File Under Seal Plaintiff United States' Reply In Further Support of Entry of Final Judgment filed by United States of America. (Attachments: # (1) Declaration of Henry C. Su In Support of Administrative Moti |
Return to top
Related changes
Source
Classification
Who this affects
Taxonomy
Browse Categories
Get Courts & Legal alerts
Weekly digest. AI-summarized, no noise.
Free. Unsubscribe anytime.
Get alerts for this source
We'll email you when NDCA Recently Filed Documents publishes new changes.