Tomlinson v. Florida, 5D2024-2171, Appeal Affirmed
Summary
The Fifth District Court of Appeal of Florida affirmed the Circuit Court for Marion County in Randall Otis Tomlinson v. State of Florida, Case No. 5D2024-2171. The per curiam decision upheld the lower court's ruling; Justices Wallis, Eisnaugle, and Soud concurred.
What changed
The Fifth District Court of Appeal affirmed the Circuit Court for Marion County's decision in a criminal matter involving appellant Randall Otis Tomlinson. The court issued a per curiam disposition with no written opinion beyond the affirmance, joined by all three justices.
This affirmance primarily affects the parties directly involved in the case. The ruling has no broader precedential value beyond the specific proceedings and does not establish new legal standards or compliance obligations for any regulated industry or public entity.
What to do next
- Monitor for updates
Archived snapshot
Apr 14, 2026GovPing captured this document from the original source. If the source has since changed or been removed, this is the text as it existed at that time.
Jump To
Top Caption Disposition Combined Opinion
Support FLP
CourtListener is a project of Free
Law Project, a federally-recognized 501(c)(3) non-profit. Members help support our work and get special access to features.
Please become a member today.
April 14, 2026 Get Citation Alerts Download PDF Add Note
Randall Otis Tomlinson v. State of Florida
District Court of Appeal of Florida
- Citations: None known
- Docket Number: 5D2024-2171
Disposition: Affirmed
Disposition
Affirmed
Combined Opinion
FIFTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL
STATE OF FLORIDA
Case No. 5D2024-2171
LT Case No. 2023-CF-000825-A
RANDALL OTIS TOMLINSON,
Appellant,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA,
Appellee.
On appeal from the Circuit Court for Marion County.
Lisa Diane Herndon, Judge.
Matthew J. Metz, Public Defender, and Louis A. Rossi, Assistant
Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant.
James Uthmeier, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Stephen R.
Putnam, Jr., Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for
Appellee.
April 14, 2026
PER CURIAM.
AFFIRMED.
WALLIS, EISNAUGLE, and SOUD, JJ., concur.
Not final until disposition of any timely and
authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or
9.331.
2
Related changes
Get daily alerts for FL District Court of Appeal Opinions
Daily digest delivered to your inbox.
Free. Unsubscribe anytime.
Source
About this page
Every important government, regulator, and court update from around the world. One place. Real-time. Free. Our mission
Source document text, dates, docket IDs, and authority are extracted directly from FL District.
The summary, classification, recommended actions, deadlines, and penalty information are AI-generated from the original text and may contain errors. Always verify against the source document.
Classification
Who this affects
Taxonomy
Browse Categories
Get alerts for this source
We'll email you when FL District Court of Appeal Opinions publishes new changes.
Subscribed!
Optional. Filters your digest to exactly the updates that matter to you.