Timothy Barrett Sr v. State of Florida - 3.850 Postconviction Appeal Affirmed
Summary
The Fifth District Court of Appeal of Florida affirmed the Circuit Court for Lake County's denial of Timothy Barrett Sr.'s Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850 postconviction motion. The appellant appeared pro se; the State did not file a response brief. The appellate panel issued a per curiam affirmance with no written opinion beyond the disposition.
What changed
Timothy Barrett Sr.'s 3.850 postconviction motion, filed in Lake County Circuit Court, was denied and that denial was affirmed on appeal by the Fifth District Court of Appeal. The appellate court issued a per curiam affirmance with no substantive written opinion, which is the standard outcome for postconviction motions that do not present arguable legal error.
For criminal defense practitioners and pro se litigants filing postconviction motions, this case illustrates that courts will summarily affirm without elaboration when the motion fails to state a cognizable claim under 3.850. The absence of a written opinion means this disposition carries no precedential value beyond the parties involved.
Archived snapshot
Apr 21, 2026GovPing captured this document from the original source. If the source has since changed or been removed, this is the text as it existed at that time.
Jump To
Top Caption Disposition Combined Opinion
Support FLP
CourtListener is a project of Free
Law Project, a federally-recognized 501(c)(3) non-profit. Members help support our work and get special access to features.
Please become a member today.
April 21, 2026 Get Citation Alerts Download PDF Add Note
Timothy Barrett, Sr. v. State of Florida
District Court of Appeal of Florida
- Citations: None known
- Docket Number: 5D2025-2245
Disposition: Affirmed
Disposition
Affirmed
Combined Opinion
FIFTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL
STATE OF FLORIDA
Case No. 5D2025-2245
LT Case No. 24-CF-001129-A
TIMOTHY BARRETT, SR.,
Appellant,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA,
Appellee.
3.850 Appeal from the Circuit Court for Lake County.
Cary F. Rada, Judge.
Timothy Barrett, Sr., Eustis, pro se.
No Appearance for Appellee.
April 21, 2026
PER CURIAM.
AFFIRMED.
JAY, C.J., and EDWARDS and KILBANE, JJ., concur.
Not final until disposition of any timely and
authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or
9.331.
2
Parties
Related changes
Get daily alerts for FL District Court of Appeal Opinions
Daily digest delivered to your inbox.
Free. Unsubscribe anytime.
Source
About this page
Every important government, regulator, and court update from around the world. One place. Real-time. Free. Our mission
Source document text, dates, docket IDs, and authority are extracted directly from FL Fifth DCA.
The summary, classification, recommended actions, deadlines, and penalty information are AI-generated from the original text and may contain errors. Always verify against the source document.
Classification
Who this affects
Taxonomy
Browse Categories
Get alerts for this source
We'll email you when FL District Court of Appeal Opinions publishes new changes.
Subscribed!
Optional. Filters your digest to exactly the updates that matter to you.