Symonette v. Symonette - Affirmed
Summary
The Fifth District Court of Appeal of Florida affirmed the Circuit Court for Lake County in Symonette v. Symonette, Case No. 5D2025-1780. The appellant Thomas B. Symonette was represented by counsel from Emrick Family Law Firm; the appellee Mary M. Bradley (n/k/a Mary Symonette) was represented by counsel from The Carlyle Appellate Law Firm. The per curiam affirmance was issued without a written opinion.
What changed
The Fifth District Court of Appeal affirmed the lower court's judgment in a domestic relations dispute between Thomas B. Symonette and Mary Symonette (n/k/a Mary M. Bradley). The appellate court issued a per curiam affirmance without written opinion, with Justices Wallis, Edwards, and Maciver concurring.
This disposition carries no precedential value as the court provided no substantive legal analysis. Practitioners monitoring this case should note that the decision is final and no longer subject to further appeal within Florida's district courts, though any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331 may still be available.
Archived snapshot
Apr 21, 2026GovPing captured this document from the original source. If the source has since changed or been removed, this is the text as it existed at that time.
Jump To
Top Caption Disposition Combined Opinion
Support FLP
CourtListener is a project of Free
Law Project, a federally-recognized 501(c)(3) non-profit. Members help support our work and get special access to features.
Please become a member today.
April 21, 2026 Get Citation Alerts Download PDF Add Note
Thomas B. Symonette v. Mary Symonette
District Court of Appeal of Florida
- Citations: None known
- Docket Number: 5D2025-1780
Disposition: Affirmed
Disposition
Affirmed
Combined Opinion
FIFTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL
STATE OF FLORIDA
Case No. 5D2025-1780
L.T. Case No. 2022-CA-002119
THOMAS B. SYMONETTE,
Appellant,
v.
MARY SYMONETTE
n/k/a MARY M. BRADLEY,
Appellee.
Nonfinal appeal from the Circuit Court for Lake County.
Heidi Davis, Judge.
Edward R. Emrick, IV and Clayton Emrick, of Emrick Family Law
Firm, Clermont, for Appellant.
John N. Bogdanoff, of The Carlyle Appellate Law Firm, Orlando,
for Appellee.
April 21, 2026
PER CURIAM.
AFFIRMED.
WALLIS, EDWARDS, and MACIVER, JJ., concur.
Not final until disposition of any timely and
authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or
9.331.
2
Parties
Related changes
Get daily alerts for FL District Court of Appeal Opinions
Daily digest delivered to your inbox.
Free. Unsubscribe anytime.
Source
About this page
Every important government, regulator, and court update from around the world. One place. Real-time. Free. Our mission
Source document text, dates, docket IDs, and authority are extracted directly from FL DCA.
The summary, classification, recommended actions, deadlines, and penalty information are AI-generated from the original text and may contain errors. Always verify against the source document.
Classification
Who this affects
Taxonomy
Browse Categories
Get alerts for this source
We'll email you when FL District Court of Appeal Opinions publishes new changes.
Subscribed!
Optional. Filters your digest to exactly the updates that matter to you.