Supreme Court Reverses Texas v. LULAC
Summary
The Supreme Court issued a summary reversal in Abbott v. League of United Latin American Citizens, reversing the District Court's judgment for the reasons set forth in the companion case. Justice Sotomayor, Justice Kagan, and Justice Jackson dissented from the Court's summary reversal. The Court's order resolves the appeal brought by Governor Abbott and the State of Texas regarding the underlying litigation.
About this source
GovPing monitors US Supreme Court Orders for new courts & legal regulatory changes. Every update since tracking began is archived, classified, and available as free RSS or email alerts — 9 changes logged to date.
What changed
The Supreme Court granted summary reversal of the District Court's judgment in Abbott v. League of United Latin American Citizens, relying on the reasoning established in the companion case Abbott v. League of United Latin American Citizens, 607 U. S. ___ (2025). Three justices—Sotomayor, Kagan, and Jackson—dissented from this disposition.
Affected parties in related voting rights and state legislation challenges should monitor for follow-on effects from this summary reversal, particularly where cases rely on the reasoning from the prior 2025 companion decision. Parties with pending litigation involving similar Texas state legislation may face adverse precedent from this order.
Archived snapshot
Apr 28, 2026GovPing captured this document from the original source. If the source has since changed or been removed, this is the text as it existed at that time.
(ORDER LIST: 608 U.S.)
MONDAY, APRIL 27, 2026
APPEAL -- SUMMARY DISPOSITION 25-845 ABBOTT, GOV. OF TX, ET AL. V. LULAC, ET AL. For the reasons set forth in Abbott v. League of United
Latin American Citizens, 607 U. S. ___ (2025), we reverse the
District Court's judgment. Justice Sotomayor, Justice Kagan, and Justice Jackson dissent from the Court's summary reversal.
ORDERS IN PENDING CASES
25-6536 HOLMES, C. V. GRANUAILE, LLC, ET AL. The motion of petitioner for reconsideration of order denying leave to proceed in forma pauperis is denied. 25-6881 IN RE RYAN P. GIVEY The motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma
pauperis is denied. Petitioner is allowed until May 18, 2026, within which to pay the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) and to submit a petition in compliance with Rule 33.1 of the Rules of this Court. CERTIORARI GRANTED 25-966 DEPT. OF LABOR, ET AL. V. SUN VALLEY ORCHARDS, LLC The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted limited to the following questions: 1) Whether Article III of the Constitution precludes the Department of Labor from adjudicating proceedings to collect monetary remedies from employers who have allegedly violated the terms and conditions of employment of H-2A workers and domestic workers in corresponding employment.
- Whether 8 U. S. C. §1188(g)(2) authorizes the Department of Labor to adjudicate proceedings to collect monetary remedies from employers who have allegedly violated the terms and conditions of employment of H-2A workers and domestic workers in corresponding employment. CERTIORARI DENIED 25-259 LITTLEJOHN, JANUARY, ET VIR V. SCH. BD. LEON CTY., FL, ET AL. 25-699 AMAPLAT MAURITIUS LTD., ET AL. V. ZIMBABWE MINING CORP., ET AL. 25-719 BATTAT, STANLEY, ET UX. V. CIR 25-724 UNIFIED LIFE INS. CO. V. UNITED STATES FIRE INS. CO. 25-756 ) HOUSEHOLDER, LARRY V. UNITED STATES ) 25-757 ) BORGES, MATTHEW V. UNITED STATES 25-938 BROADNAX, JAMES G. V. TEXAS 25-939 BROADNAX, JAMES G. V. TEXAS 25-973 DíAZ-SANTIAGO, RAY L. V. SáNCHEZ-ACOSTA, JOSé, ET AL. 25-983 SOCIéTé GéNéRALE DE BANQUE V. LELCHOOK, ESTER, ET AL. 25-993 OPPEDISANO, VINCENZO V. ZUR, LYNDA 25-1001 UNITED STATES V. DOUCET, BRIANI L. 25-1005 BARNES, JANICE H. V. ROBERTO, FELIX, ET AL. 25-1014 SAUD, LAITH V. DePAUL UNIV. 25-1016 KRUGLOV, DMITRY V. FED. NAT. MORTGAGE ASSN. 25-1023 SHOEMAKER, JAMES M. V. MOORE, LESLIE R., ET AL. 25-1024 FAILLACE, FRANK V. HOLLIS, ZOE 25-1044 KAIAMA, AZIZI K. V. USDC HI, ET AL. 25-1045 MASSEY, CHARLES A. V. WALTERS, DIR., VA DOC 25-1063 FERGUSON, STEVE V. TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO 25-1072 WOOD, AMANDA V. SAN ANTONIO, TX, ET AL. 25-1102 SAYLOR, JAMES V. JEFFREYS, DIR., NE DOC
25-1114 ESCAPEX IP, LLC V. GOOGLE LLC 25-1120 HILD, MICHAEL V. UNITED STATES 25-1125 RUIZ, JOSE V. THE BRADFORD EXCH., LTD. 25-1137 HONCHARIW, NICHOLAS V. CTY. OF STANISLAUS, CA 25-1138 HERTO, STEPHEN D. V. MURPHY, WARDEN 25-6240 CONTRERAS-AGUILAR, JOEL V. TEXAS 25-6291 PARISI, GEORGIANNA V. ESTATE OF JACKIE JONES, ET AL. 25-6429 CHIPUNOV, GEORGIY V. UNITED STATES 25-6634 REAVES, JOSEPH D. V. PENNSYLVANIA 25-6636 BRYANT, DONNIE V. UNITED STATES 25-6857 BELLINSKY, JACOB V. GALAN, RACHEL Z. 25-6861 HWANG, KYUHWAN V. ARITA, JERRY Q., ET AL. 25-6863 JAFFE, MICHAEL V. DOE, KRIS 25-6882 ESTRACA, ROJELIO V. TEXAS 25-6902 FERRER, ALEJANDRO V. FLORIDA 25-6907 RICHARDS, ALICIA M. V. RICHARDS, RYAL W. 25-6910 VREELAND, DELMART E. V. COLORADO 25-6913 KLINE, ANNIE-GRACE V. LEIDOS, INC. 25-6914 LAWRENCE, MURRAY V. ALABAMA 25-7032 SCOTT, RODRICUS D. V. JONES, WARDEN 25-7057 CARTER, DIANNE M. V. KAISER, APRIL M., ET AL. 25-7069 MINTON, NEAL L. V. FLORIDA 25-7074 JENKINS, ETHAN V. TEXAS 25-7094 OGLESBY, EDDIE J. V. UNITED STATES 25-7098 JEAN-GILLES, KEVIN V. UNITED STATES 25-7099 CHAIDEZ, JUAN J. V. UNITED STATES 25-7114 VASQUEZ, BRIAN V. COLORADO 25-7118 NICKAS, SUSAN M. V. UNITED STATES
25-7122 JOHNSON, TRINA M. V. UNITED STATES 25-7123 HASSAN, MOHAMED A. V. UNITED STATES 25-7124 BOWMAN, JERRELL T. V. UNITED STATES The petitions for writs of certiorari are denied. 25-6878 KIFOR, IMRE V. MASSACHUSETTS, ET AL. 25-6887 TAYLOR, JERMEL A. V. WASHINGTON CTY. JAIL The motions of petitioners for leave to proceed in forma
pauperis are denied, and the petitions for writs of certiorari are dismissed. See Rule 39.8. HABEAS CORPUS DENIED 25-7139 IN RE WILLIAM J. MORRA 25-7148 IN RE GEORGE E. CROSS The petitions for writs of habeas corpus are denied. REHEARINGS DENIED 24-7175 IN RE KEVIN OGDEN 24-7313 HILT, DALLAS C. V. ANDERSON, SHERIFF 25-814 HACKMAN, ASSATA A. V. INDUCTEV 25-841 WADE, HENRY T. V. UNITED STATES 25-5238 IN RE DENNIS GRIFFITH 25-5530 PARENTEAU, EDMOND G. V. UNITED STATES 25-5571 GUESS, THURMOND R. V. COBLE, JUDGE, ET AL. 25-5794 GOLDEN, JASMINE E. V. AMAZON 25-5849 GRAY, DARVIN W. V. BRIDGES, WARDEN 25-5919 GRIFFIN, KEVIN V. NEW YORK 25-6104 HENDERSON, TERENCE V. DEPT. OF ARMY, ET AL. 25-6365 PROVO, TIMOTHY R. V. TENNEY, GEOFFREY W., ET AL. The petitions for rehearing are denied.
Mentioned entities
Parties
Related changes
Get daily alerts for US Supreme Court Orders
Daily digest delivered to your inbox.
Free. Unsubscribe anytime.
About this page
Every important government, regulator, and court update from around the world. One place. Real-time. Free. Our mission
Source document text, dates, docket IDs, and authority are extracted directly from SCOTUS.
The summary, classification, recommended actions, deadlines, and penalty information are AI-generated from the original text and may contain errors. Always verify against the source document.
Classification
Who this affects
Taxonomy
Browse Categories
Get alerts for this source
We'll email you when US Supreme Court Orders publishes new changes.
Subscribed!
Optional. Filters your digest to exactly the updates that matter to you.